Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Understanding How Production Processes Impact Drug Quality

Making medicines is a stressful business, literally. Bioprocessing technologies, cleaning agents, and even packaging can create stresses that impact drug quality. Understanding these stresses is the first step towards addressing them, says Tapan Das, PhD. seni

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Making medicines is a stressful business, literally. Bioprocessing technologies, cleaning agents, and even packaging can create stresses that impact drug quality. Understanding these stresses is the first step towards addressing them, says Tapan Das, PhD. senior director of product development at Bristol Myers Squibb, the author of a new study examining how production affects the quality of ingredients and finished drugs. Das had previously published a paper on the topic two years ago.

“While there are several common stress factors across drug substance manufacturing, product manufacturing, and packaging, there are some specific ones to the unit operations in substance or product manufacturing,” he points out.

In drug substance production host-cell proteins (HCPs) are the most obvious example of a potential stress factor, according to Das, who had published a paper.

“Residual levels of certain host cell proteins have the potential to negatively impact patient safety as well as purity, stability, and consistency,” he tells GEN. “Some of the residual HCPs are enzymes that are known to degrade protein and excipients in long- term storage. To minimize HCP-related risks, HCPs should be controlled to low levels.”

Mechanical forces, both those in the bioreactor and those applied during downstream steps, are another example of a stress factor.

“Forces used in the bioreactor during fermentation and harvest can cause cell rupture that can result in the release of intracellular reducing enzymes such as thioredoxin reductase, which in turn can enhance formation of half antibody species due to reduction of disulfide bonds,” continues Das, adding that to mitigate against such mechanical damage, bioreactor developers have introduced new technologies like air-sparging to maintain an oxidative environment that supports healthy cell growth.

Material stresses

Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) is used to sterilize bioprocessing technologies, packaging materials, and systems. It is also a potential stress factor.

“Residual levels of VHP are found adsorbed to primary packaging materials, for example, vials and stoppers, and other surfaces, such as silicone tubing,” explains Das. “VHP then transfers to liquid DP during filling operation, which subsequently may cause protein oxidation.”

“Biopharmaceutical manufacturers should perform engineering runs to assess the sensitivity of a given protein to oxidation by VHP, according to Das.

But sterilization reagents are not the only potential stress factors drugs encounter during the packaging process.

“In vials, therapeutic proteins can come into contact with micron-size glass fragments due to glass delamination,” says Das. “The resulting ‘protein-coated’ glass micro-particles increase the likelihood of negative immune responses to the drug.”

Again, testing during engineering runs has emerged as industry’s preferred solution. Many therapeutic protein developers now trial a range of vials with each new product candidate to minimize the risk of delamination.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →