Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Visterra Wins Up-to-$204.5M BARDA Contract; Reports Positive Phase IIa Results

Visterra said today it has won a five-year, up-to-$204.5 million contract from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) toward the development of the company’s Phase IIa lead product candidate VIS410 for seasonal and potential pandemi

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Visterra said today it has won a five-year, up-to-$204.5 million contract from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) toward the development of the company’s Phase IIa lead product candidate VIS410 for seasonal and potential pandemic influenza A.

The BARDA contract includes funding for performing preclinical toxicology studies, conducting clinical trials, manufacturing of materials for clinical trials and continued optimization of manufacturing processes, and associated regulatory activities intended to advance VIS410, Visterra said.

Separately, Visterra also said today that it intends to advance VIS410 into further clinical trials in patients with influenza A, after the compound showed a statistically significant viral response over placebo in a Phase IIa influenza viral challenge study, and achieved its primary endpoint of reduction in viral shedding.

Subjects treated with VIS410 experienced a 92% reduction in viral shedding and resolved upper respiratory symptoms two days earlier than subjects in the placebo group. The primary endpoint was achieved after a pre-specified interim analysis, and as a result, Visterra said, it has stopped the comparative portion of the study.

VIS140 is a broad spectrum human monoclonal antibody designed and engineered to neutralize all strains of influenza A, including mutated strains and strains that have recently emerged. VIS410 is a direct acting anti-viral that inhibits hemagglutinin-mediated cell membrane fusion, thereby preventing viral replication.

Through its Hierotope Platform to identify novel targets and engineer drugs against these targets, Visterra has identified a conformational epitope on the stem region of the influenza hemagglutinin protein. According to the company, this epitope, or hierotope, is not only conserved across all influenza subtypes, but is also resistant to virus mutation.

Visterra said it is developing VIS410 as a single administration treatment for hospitalized patients with influenza A infection, including seasonal and potential pandemic strains.

The BARDA contract includes a 40-month base period with committed funding of $29.1 million, as well as option periods that, if exercised in full by BARDA, would extend the contract to a total of five years and increase the total funding up to $204.5 million. The full funding would support Visterra’s plans to submit a Biologics License Application for VIS410 to the FDA.

“Visterra is proud to play an important role in addressing the significant public health concern of seasonal influenza A and the growing threat of emerging strains of influenza A,” Brian J.G. Pereira, M.D., the company’s president and CEO, said in a statement.

Based in Cambridge, MA, Visterra was founded based on scientific work developed in the laboratory of Ram Sasisekharan, Ph.D., and licensed from MIT.

The BARDA contract comes a year to the month that Visterra won $30 million in Series B financing to advance the development of VIS410 and a second product candidate, VIS513, a human monoclonal antibody for dengue that has been shown to broadly neutralize all four dengue virus serotypes.

The financing was co-led by new investors Merck Research Labs Venture Fund, Vertex Venture Holdings Ltd., and Temasek, with participation by another new investor, Cycad Group, and previous investors Polaris Partners, Flagship Ventures, Omega Funds and Alexandria Venture Investments. The previous investors joined The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in a $26 million series A financing in 2012.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →