Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Toxoplasma gondii Engineered to Deliver Drugs to the Brain

The delivery of drugs across barriers, including the notoriously challenging blood-brain barrier, remains one of the biggest hurdles in drug discovery. “One of the biggest challenges in treating neurological diseases is getting through the blood-brain barrier

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

The delivery of drugs across barriers, including the notoriously challenging blood-brain barrier, remains one of the biggest hurdles in drug discovery.

“One of the biggest challenges in treating neurological diseases is getting through the blood-brain barrier (BBB),” explained Oded Rechavi, PhD, professor at Tel Aviv University. “It is very difficult to deliver drugs to the brain via the bloodstream, and this is especially true for large molecules such as proteins, the critical ‘machines’ that carry out many important functions inside the cell.”

And although novel approaches have been tried, and some have made progress, drug delivery to neurons remains an unmet need. A new solution utilizes the unicellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii, which can infect a vast variety of organisms, but reproduces only in the guts of cats. The parasite is very effective in infecting humans, with an estimated third of the global population infected at some point in their lives. In this new study, T. gondii was engineered to deliver drugs to the human brain.

The results were published in Nature Microbiology in the paper, “Engineering Toxoplasma gondii secretion systems for intracellular delivery of multiple large therapeutic proteins to neurons.”

Regarding T. gondii, Rechavi explained, “Most people don’t even feel the infection or only experience mild flu-like symptoms. The parasite is, however, dangerous for people with immune failure due to conditions like AIDS, and for fetuses whose immune system has not yet developed. This is why pregnant women are advised not to eat raw meat which might contain the parasite, and to stay away from cats, who might deliver it through their feces. While ridding the body of the parasite, a healthy immune system has only limited access to the brain, and the parasite remains in the brain throughout the carrier’s lifetime.”

The parasite’s ability to penetrate the human brain and survive there in a dormant state, without reproducing, made it a perfect candidate for the researchers’ novel approach: to genetically engineer T. gondii to secrete therapeutic proteins. In addition, previous work has demonstrated that T. gondii can deliver proteins to host cells.

In this new study, the team used transgenic model animals that were injected with parasites genetically engineered to produce and secrete proteins that travel into cell nuclei. More specifically, they “engineered T. gondii’s endogenous secretion systems, the rhoptries and dense granules, to deliver multiple large (>100 kDa) therapeutic proteins into neurons via translational fusions to toxofilin and GRA16.”

Several lines of evidence proved that the proteins had been delivered to the target area and remained active in the neurons’ nuclei including demonstrated delivery in cultured cells, brain organoids, and in vivo, and probe protein activity using imaging, pull-down assays, scRNA-seq, and fluorescent reporters.

In addition, the researchers demonstrated robust delivery after intraperitoneal administration in mice. As a proof of concept, they demonstrated GRA16-mediated brain delivery of the MeCP2 protein, whose deficiency is associated with Rett syndrome.

“This is a deadly syndrome caused by a deficiency in a single gene called MePC2 in brain cells, and our engineered Toxoplasma gondii was able to deliver it to the target cells,” said Rechavi. “But this is just one example. There are many other diseases caused by deficiency or abnormal expression of a certain protein.”

To ensure the method’s safe and effective therapeutic implementation, for both drug delivery and genetic editing, the company Epeius was established in collaboration with Ramot—the technology transfer company of Tel Aviv University, and with the University of Glasgow’s research and innovation services.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →