Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Enlaza Therapeutics Grabs $61 Million to Industrialize Covalent Biologics

Enlaza Therapeutics, the first covalent biologic platform company, officially launched today with $61 million in seed funding. The money will be used to advance Enlaza’s unique covalent biologic platform, called War-Lock, and to set up a pipeline of cancer tre

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Enlaza Therapeutics, the first covalent biologic platform company, officially launched today with $61 million in seed funding. The money will be used to advance Enlaza’s unique covalent biologic platform, called War-Lock, and to set up a pipeline of cancer treatments with improved safety and efficacy.

“[Covalent biologics] is something that no one has done before,” Sergio Duron, PhD, CEO of Enlaza, told GEN Edge. “It’s ‘white space’ for drug discovery, and we think there’s a monumental opportunity here to improve [drug] safety and efficacy. We want covalency to become a standard part of the toolbox in this field of biologics and protein drug discovery.”

In its first year, Enlaza has grown to about 30 staff and assembled a leadership team that also includes Sanford (Sandy) Madigan, PhD, president and chief business officer; Analeah Heidt, PhD, chief scientific officer; and Lei Wang PhD, scientific advisor and professor at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

The financing for Enlaza—derived from the Spanish word enlazar, which means to link or to connect, and describes the War-Lock technology to covalently bind proteins—was spearheaded by Avalon Ventures with assistance from Lightspeed Venture Partners, Frazier Life Sciences, and Samsara BioCapital.

The wizardry of War-Lock

Most drugs work via weak, reversible bonding. A few attempts have been made over the past decade to develop small-molecule drugs that work through covalent binding (examples include Avila and Principia—eventually bought out by Celgene and Sanofi, respectively, for their work on developing BTK targeted covalent inhibitors in a race for FDA approval and commercialization—as well as Terremotto, which launched in 2022). But these small molecules are typically inhibitors and carry an electrophile that reacts non-selectively. Duron says that there’s been significant progress in the covalent and biologic spaces, and he believes that coupling covalency with biologics, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and radioligand therapies (RLTs), opens up a brand new field.

Enlaza’s technology uses “unnatural” amino acids that are essentially non-reactive until the biologic binds the molecular target and forces proximity between the unnatural amino acid and a nucleophile on the target, resulting in cross-linking. The War-Lock technology can be applied to any protein drug that can incorporate unnatural amino acid with the aim to improve safety and efficacy. Duron says that the nature of the War-Lock platform can enable a variety of biological or drug discovery strategies with a very diverse set of potential partners.

“We can mediate toxicity by leveraging high clearance but also have long-term pharmacodynamics and efficacy without exposure to the drug,” said Duron. “We can improve efficacy for targets that have low copy number or receptor density. This is something that is challenging in today’s drug discovery. If you have a target that has a low copy number or receptor density, covalency can impact the fidelity of the payload we’re trying to attach.”

Culling cancer with covalency

Where biologics have failed as cancer treatments because of issues with safety and efficacy, Duron thinks covalent biologics could make improvements. Enlaza intends to expand the covalent biologic platform to multiple oncology treatment strategies using antibody-drug ADCs and RLTs.

The Enlaza CEO also envisions small-format protein biologics that can have very good penetration and high clearance of solid tumors without having to use half-life extension strategies. According to Duron, Enlaza has produced preclinical data for its oncology drug candidates that demonstrate rapid tumor penetration along with high systemic clearance, high tumor retention, and low off-target toxicity.

The seed funding will help advance several of these programs and support IND enablement, including CMC (chemistry, manufacturing, and controls) activities. It will also enable Enlaza to continue the proof-of-concept work and industrialization of the War-Lock technology, which is built on technologies that have been exclusively licensed from UCSF and The Scripps Research Institute.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →