Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Pharming Earns $15M up Front as Part of Deal with Santarus for HAE Drug

Approval of Rhucin/Ruconest in Europe is imminent, firm claims, with BLA filing planned by year-end. Santarus is to pay Pharming $15 million up front as part of an agreement for development and commercialization of the latter’s hereditary angioedema (HAE) drug

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Approval of Rhucin/Ruconest in Europe is imminent, firm claims, with BLA filing planned by year-end.

Santarus is to pay Pharming $15 million up front as part of an agreement for development and commercialization of the latter’s hereditary angioedema (HAE) drug, Rhucin® (known Ruconest™ in Europe), in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. In June Pharming announced that it expects to submit a BLA for Rhucin as a treatment for acute attacks of HAE to FDA by early 2011 at the latest. Meanwhile, European approval of the treatment is imminent, Pharming points out.

Under terms of the North American deal Pharming will receive additional clinical and commercial milestones including $5 million once the Rhucin BLA submission has been accepted by FDA. Pharming will shoulder the clinical development of Rhucin for HAE and all HAE-related regulatory activities in the U.S. Santarus takes on responsibility for regulatory approval of the treatment in Canada and Mexico The companies will share responsibility for and costs associated with clinical development of Rhucin as a treatment for or prevention of renal transplantation rejection. Santarus will be responsible for regulatory activities related to this indication in North America.

Rhucin is a recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor protein expressed in the milk of transgenic rabbits. The product is in development initially for the treatment of acute attacks of HAE. In June European regulatory authorities adopted a positive opinion for Ruconest, and Pharming says final approval throughout the EU is expected very soon. The firm aims to launch the product in Europe during the fourth quarter of this year.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →