Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Opioid Acts Only on Hurt Tissues, Skips Side Effects

A new opioid can target “disease-specific” (pathological rather than physiological) conformations of receptors and ligands by selectively activating opioid receptors where acidic conditions prevail, as in tissues affected by inflammation or injury. Thus, the o

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

A new opioid can target “disease-specific” (pathological rather than physiological) conformations of receptors and ligands by selectively activating opioid receptors where acidic conditions prevail, as in tissues affected by inflammation or injury. Thus, the opioid brings pain relief at the site of inflammation and does not affect healthy tissues, such as those of the brain or intestinal wall, thereby avoiding side effects. [G. Del Vecchio & V. Spahn/Freepik]

Opioids, like sledgehammers, are powerful but blunt tools. When they are used to flatten pain, opioids may give other things a pounding, too. The problem is conventional opioids act on inflamed or damaged tissues as well as healthy tissues. Consequently, while opioids may relieve pain, they may also cause serious side effects, such as drowsiness, nausea, constipation, and dependency—and in some cases, respiratory arrest.

In hopes of finding a way to craft finer painkilling tools, scientists based at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin scrutinized different ways opioids can interact with opioid receptors. These scientists, led by Prof. Dr. Christoph Stein, were on the lookout for “disease-specific” opioid receptor-ligand conformations. That is, the scientists plan was to exploit pathological (rather than physiological) conformation dynamics in the design of new opioids, and thereby create drugs that would target damaged or inflamed tissues yet bypass healthy tissues.

“By analyzing drug–opioid receptor interactions in damaged tissues, as opposed to healthy tissues, we were hoping to provide useful information for the design of new painkillers without harmful side effects,” said Prof. Dr. Stein.

Prof. Dr. Stein’s team was aware that previous strategies in drug development had focused on central opioid receptors in noninjured environments, even though many painful syndromes (such as arthritis, neuropathy, and surgery) are driven by peripheral sensory neurons and are typically accompanied by inflammation with tissue acidosis. Ultimately, the team decided that this alternative mechanism of action—the binding and activation of peripheral opioid receptors—could be preferentially exploited by a new class of opioids. The key was the occurrence of acid conditions.

By following through on this idea, the scientists designed a new opioid that, unlike clinically used opioids, best activates the receptors in acidified tissues. When the new opioid was evaluated in a rat model of inflammatory pain, it exerted strong pain relief essentially without the side effects of standard opioids.

Details appeared March 3 in the journal Science, in an article entitled, “A Nontoxic Pain Killer Designed by Modeling of Pathological Receptor Conformations.” The article describes how the scientists used computer modeling to analyze morphine-like molecules and their interactions with opioid receptors. In particular, computer modeling was used to simulate an increased concentration of protons, thereby mimicking the acidic conditions found in inflamed tissues.

“By computer simulations at low pH, a hallmark of injured tissue, we designed an agonist that, because of its low acid dissociation constant, selectively activates peripheral μ-opioid receptors at the source of pain generation,” wrote the article’s authors. “Unlike the conventional opioid fentanyl, this agonist showed pH-sensitive binding, heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide–binding protein (G protein) subunit dissociation by fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate inhibition in vitro.”

The authors observed that their novel opioid produced injury-restricted analgesia in rats with different types of inflammatory pain without exhibiting respiratory depression, sedation, constipation, or addiction potential. These results, the authors suggested, mean that treating postoperative and chronic inflammatory pain should now be possible without causing side effects. Doing so would substantially improve patient quality of life.

“In contrast to conventional opioids, our NFEPP-prototype appears to only bind to, and activate, opioid receptors in an acidic environment,” explained the study's first authors, Dr. Viola Spahn and Dr. Giovanna Del Vecchio. “This means it produces pain relief only in injured tissues, and without causing respiratory depression, drowsiness, the risk of dependency, or constipation.”

“We were able to show that the protonation of drugs is a key requirement for the activation of opioid receptors,” the authors concluded. Their findings, which may also apply to other types of pain, may even find application in other areas of receptor research. Thereby, the benefits of improved drug efficacy and tolerability are not limited to painkillers, but may include other drugs as well.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →