Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

NIH Bankrolls $10M for Albert Einstein College of Medicine to Study Motion-Induced Enzyme Changes

Technologies developed at the university allow researchers to watch reactions on the pico- to millisecond timescale. NIH awarded Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University a five-year, $10 million grant to study how the motion of atoms on both e

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Technologies developed at the university allow researchers to watch reactions on the pico- to millisecond timescale.

NIH awarded Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University a five-year, $10 million grant to study how the motion of atoms on both extremely small and long time scales contribute to enzyme function. The research aims to elucidate chemical reactions that are both central to life and become dysfunctional in disease states.

It is well known that atomic motion alters the shape of proteins over relatively broad time scales, from milliseconds to seconds. These motion-induced changes thus affect the speed of enzymatic reactions. Until recently, researchers have lacked the tools to study protein motion on a sub-millisecond time scale, according to the University.

Theoretical and experimental techniques developed at Einstein and at Emory University now allow investigators to watch these chemical reactions from picoseconds to milliseconds. These technologies include nanosecond laser spectroscopies and ultrafast microfluidic mixing, which are coupled with innovative computational analyses.

“Some of our findings to date challenge long-held textbook understanding of enzymatic catalysis,” remarks study leader, Robert Callender, Ph.D., professor of biochemistry at Einstein. In the conventional view, an enzyme combines with a substrate to form what is known as the Michaelis complex, ultimately leading to a new molecule, or the product.

“But it turns out to be more complicated than this,” according to Dr. Callender. “If you look at this process more deeply, you see all these different enzyme-substrate conformations, numbering in the thousands, even hundreds of thousands. Our hypothesis is that not all of these conformations are equally active, just a few actually lead to the product. In addition, the protein body of the enzyme functions more as a chemical machine than a simple organic catalyst. This stands classical enzymology on its head.

“The detailed structure of the enzymatic transition state is a powerful target for drug design, and increased knowledge of how enzymes form this state is fundamental for all catalysts and specifically for designing new classes of drugs,” notes Dr. Callender.

The research program is divided into four projects: • Energy landscapes encoding function in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) over broad time scales: LDH is an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of lactate to pyruvate, an important step in energy production in cells. • Protein dynamic contributions to transition state formation in purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP): PNP is an enzyme that helps to degrade nucleotides and nucleic acids and has emerged as a drug target in a variety of diseases including cancer and autoimmune dysfunction. • Mapping the energy landscape of catalysis in dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR): DHFR is an enzyme needed for synthesizing DNA, RNA, and protein. It is a target for methotrexate and other DHFR inhibitors used in treating diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. • Energy landscapes and motional timescales in enzyme catalysis.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →