Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Poxvirus Therapy: Existing Drugs May Offer New, More Durable Approach

Scientists in the U.K. have discovered how poxviruses such as the monkeypox virus (MPXV) and variola viruses evade host cell defenses by exploiting a protein, cyclophilin A (CypA), that puts the brakes on a natural cellular antiviral protein called human tripa

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Scientists in the U.K. have discovered how poxviruses such as the monkeypox virus (MPXV) and variola viruses evade host cell defenses by exploiting a protein, cyclophilin A (CypA), that puts the brakes on a natural cellular antiviral protein called human tripartite motif protein 5α (TRIM5α), which then allows the pathogens to replicate and spread. Results from the study, headed by a team at the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, and the Pirbright Institute, point to a new therapeutic approach that may be more durable than current treatments, and which could feasibly use existing immunosuppressants such as cyclosporin A (CsA) and other antiviral drugs that target cyclophilin A.

Initial experiments reported by the researchers suggested that these drugs can restrict replication and spread of poxviruses. They suggest that this approach to treatment, whereby the drug does not directly target the virus, could make it more difficult for poxviruses to evolve drug resistance. And because the protein-hijacking mechanism is the same across many poxviruses, cyclophilin A-targeting drugs could be effective in treating a range of diseases.

“The drugs we identified may be more durable than the current treatment for monkeypox—and we expect will also be effective against a range of other poxviruses including the one that causes smallpox,” said research lead Geoffrey L. Smith, FRS FMedSci FRSB, who conducted the work in the department of pathology at the University of Cambridge, the Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, and the Pirbright Institute. Smith and colleagues reported on their findings in Nature, in a paper titled, “TRIM5α restricts poxviruses and is antagonized by CypA and the viral protein C6,” in which they concluded that their results “warrant testing of CsA derivatives against orthopoxviruses, including monkeypox and variola.”

Smallpox has been eradicated as a disease since 1979, but the virus that causes it, variola, is still being held in two high-security labs—one in the United States and one in Russia. The threat of variola virus being used in bioterrorism has led to a drug, tecovirimat, being licensed to treat smallpox. Vaccinia virus (VACV), the live vaccine used to eradicate smallpox, is also currently being used to immunize at-risk populations against monkeypox virus, the cause of monkeypox (mpox), the team explained. “VACV, cowpox virus (CPXV), MPXV, camelpox virus (CMLV), and variola virus (VARV), the cause of smallpox, are all orthopoxviruses and are immunologically cross-protective.” Tecovirimat has been used to treat severe cases of mpox over the last year, but this has resulted in the emergence of multiple drug-resistant strains of the monkeypox virus.

Once a poxvirus infects a host cell it has to defend itself from attack by cellular proteins that would restrict virus replication and spread. The newly reported research started with the simple observation that vaccinia virus infection causes a reduction in the level of TRIM5α in human cells. To find out why, the team engineered human cells to lack TRIM5α and found that in these cells the virus replicated and spread better, indicating that TRIM5α has anti-viral activity.

The team next identified the vaccinia virus protein that TRIM5α targets. They also discovered that the virus has two defenses against attack by TRIM5a. First, it exploits another cellular protein, cyclophilin A, to block the antiviral activity of TRIM5α, and second, it makes a protein, C6, that induces destruction of TRIM5α. “… the antiviral activity of TRIM5α is countered by the proviral activity of CypA, which in turn is antagonized by CsA and derivatives that prevent the binding of CypA to its viral target, the poxvirus capsid protein L3,” the team stated. L3 is highly conserved in orthopoxviruses, and the team showed that L3 from VACV, MPXV, and VARV binds to human CypA and human TRIM5α, and the former interaction is prevented by CsA and derivatives. Moreover, they wrote, “Like L3, C6 is highly conserved in orthopoxviruses, and C6 orthologues from VACV, CPXV, CMLV, MPXV, and VARV all bind to human TRIM5α and induce its degradation, despite most of these proteins deriving from viruses that are not endemic in humans.”

Existing drugs target cyclophilin A, and when the team tested a series of these drugs against a range of poxviruses, including monkeypox, they found that the drugs exhibited antiviral effects, effectively by making the virus more sensitive to TRIM5α. “The role of CypA in antagonizing the antiviral activity of TRIM5α provides a route to antiviral drug development for orthopoxviruses such as MPXV and VARV,” the team noted. “CsA and the non-immunosuppressive derivatives alisporivir and NIM811, interrupt the interaction of CypA and L3, and thereby reverse the proviral activity of CypA and enhance TRIM5α-mediated restriction. These compounds are therefore antiviral in the presence of CypA and TRIM5α and can restrict the replication and spread of orthopoxviruses.”

“There are various drugs that target cyclophilin A, and because many of them have gone through clinical trials we wouldn’t be starting from scratch but repurposing existing drugs, which is much quicker,” said Smith. “Our results were completely unexpected. We started the research because we’re interested in understanding the basic science of how poxviruses evade host defenses and we had absolutely no idea this might lead to drugs to treat monkeypox virus and other poxviruses.

The authors further noted that in contrast with tecovirimat, which does not block replication and needs a functional immune system to remove virus-infected cells alongside drug treatment, CsA, alisporivir, and NIM811 hinder virus replication by targeting a cellular protein, “making the emergence of drug resistance difficult.” Both of the non-immunosuppressive derivatives have also progressed in development to Phase II clinical trials, and so there is also an indication of their safety. “Therefore, clinical testing of these drugs against MPXV is warranted,” the team stated.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →