Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Neuroskeletal Building Block Responsible for Deficits in Development, Intellect and other Behaviors

Just as you could not stand tall or move without your bony frame, each neuron has its own skeletal scaffold of interconnected tubes of protein that gives it shape, traffics cargo, and allows it to move. The SPTBN1 gene encodes the βII-spectrin protein, that is

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Just as you could not stand tall or move without your bony frame, each neuron has its own skeletal scaffold of interconnected tubes of protein that gives it shape, traffics cargo, and allows it to move.

The SPTBN1 gene encodes the βII-spectrin protein, that is a building block in the micrometer-scale meshwork that lies right under the neuronal membrane. When this meshwork is defective in mice, cerebral neurons are in disarray, pups do not reach developmental landmarks, and the adult mice display behavioral abnormalities.

Scientists have now identified 29 individuals with mutations in one of their two SPTNB1 genes, who exhibit developmental, language and motor delays, mild to severe intellectual disability, autistic symptoms, seizures, behavioral and movement abnormalities, low muscle tone and abnormalities in facial morphology.

The global team of collaborating researchers led by scientists at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill show that these human SPTBN1 variant proteins are unable to latch on to their molecular partners which disrupts the stability, organization and dynamics of the neuronal β-spectrin scaffold.

These findings are published in the Nature Genetics article, Pathogenic SPTBN1 variants cause an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental syndrome. The study was funded by the Center for Individualized Medicine at the Mayo Clinic, the National Ataxia Foundation, and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The authors note that the study defines SPTBN1 variants as the genetic basis of a neurodevelopmental syndrome (spectrinopathy) and underscores the important function of βII-spectrin in the nervous system. This study is the first step in finding a treatment for the disorder and provides new genetic insights into how the brain functions.

“The gene can now be included in genetic testing for people suspected of having a neurodevelopmental disorder, which may end the diagnostic odyssey these people and their families have endured,” says Margot Cousin, PhD, a translational genomics researcher in Mayo Clinic’s Center for Individualized Medicine and the study’s lead author. “While there is not yet a specific treatment available for people affected by SPTBN1-associated disease, we can now provide patients with an answer to the root cause of disease, which is the most important first step toward finding a cure.”

Most of the SPTNB1 genetic variants were not inherited, but rather occurred in the affected patients, says Cousin.

“We showed through multiple different model systems, including computational protein modeling, human- and mouse cell-based systems, patient-derived cell systems, and in vivo mouse studies, the impact the variants have on the function of the protein encoded by the SPTBN1 gene,” says Cousin.

“Some of the variants behave very differently than the others, where some make the βII spectrin protein unstable and some disrupt its ability to make important interactions with other proteins. These differences in functional effects explain the clinical variability we were observing in the patients.”

Many neurodevelopmental diseases remain undiagnosed under the current standard of care, posing a significant challenge in rare disease genomic research but Cousin believes the tide is turning.

Clinical variability, particularly when the sample size is small, can make it difficult to ascertain whether the spectrum of symptoms can arise from mutations in a single gene.

“The gene, however, had many of the hallmarks of a rare monogenic disease gene, including that the normal population doesn’t have variation in SPTBN1, other spectrin genes cause neurological syndromes, and mouse studies completely lacking the protein have severe defects,” Cousin explains.

Cousin says the cell-based and animal models developed in the study will continue to be invaluable in advancing knowledge of the disease mechanisms and testing potential treatments.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →