Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Neuromuscular Platforms for Drug Discovery

Sponsored Content Brought to you by Mouse models, pioneered by The Jackson Laboratory (JAX), the renowned research institute headquartered in Bar Harbor, ME, provide a wealth of new opportunities to mimic and modulate human genetic abnormalities found within t

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Sponsored Content Brought to you by

Mouse models, pioneered by The Jackson Laboratory (JAX), the renowned research institute headquartered in Bar Harbor, ME, provide a wealth of new opportunities to mimic and modulate human genetic abnormalities found within the population, as well as investigate therapeutic efficacy on a rapid timeline.

While model selection depends on the target and mode of action of the therapeutic, it is essential that the model has both face validity and construct validity seen in human disease. As examples of JAX’s neuromuscular platform work, consider two examples within neurodegenerative research: spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

SMA is caused by a deficiency of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, resulting in the selective loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord and lower brain, and progressive skeletal muscle atrophy and weakness. The genetic cause is a homozygous deletion or mutation of SMN1. Studies have also shown an inverse correlation between the copy number of the closely related SMN2 gene and SMA severity.

Over a 15-year period, SMA researchers built the foundation for the successful clinical trials of Biogen’s Spinraza™ (Nusinersen), which utilizes an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) to control SMN protein expression. The FDA approved Spinraza in 2016.

To support cutting-edge research, JAX has been able to archive the most relevant in vivo mouse models and make them available to the research community. In addition to that, the scientists at JAX have used some of these models to define therapeutic windows and characterize the models further.

Arthur Burghes (Ohio State University) developed the first-generation SMA mouse models, which modeled the severity of the patients. Cat Lutz, director of JAX Rare and Orphan Disease Center, and collaborators at Columbia University, subsequently used an inducible mouse model to determine the optimal therapeutic window to restore SMN protein, and stop disease progression.

The Burgheron model was further characterized by Lutz and colleagues and was used to validate electrophysiological outcome measures to characterize the natural disease history, including the age of onset. The slower disease progression in this model allows a wider window for therapeutic intervention making it particularly useful for efficacy studies.

A more complex disease

ALS is a neurodegenerative disease predominantly affecting upper and lower motor neurons. It is characterized by the progressive degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord that lead to relentlessly progressive weakness of voluntary muscles. Familial ALS (fALS) accounts for about 10% of cases.

The first genetic mutations found to cause ALS, reported in 1993, reside in the superoxide dismutase gene, SOD1. Since then, researchers have linked ALS to mutations in more than 50 genes; 16 of which have been unequivocally implicated in ALS pathogenesis.1 These findings reveal multiple ALS pathogenic pathways, opening the door for stratified therapeutics based on individual genes, pathways, or mechanisms.

While no single model can reflect the full spectrum of ALS, many current mouse models are excellent at emulating specific disease facets.2

For example, B6SJL-Tg(SOD1*G93A)1Gur/J (also known as SOD1-G93A) animals carry a transgene insertion of the human SOD1 gene with a single amino acid substitution (G93A). This model recapitulates many aspects of fALS and has been thoroughly characterized by JAX In Vivo Services using traditional readouts as well as electrophysiological

assessments to understand the disease’s complete natural history.

JAX expertise

Utilizing mouse models to develop treatments for specific human diseases requires the inclusion of robust phenotypes to examine potential candidates. JAX provides extensive expertise in these models as they have tested many of the strains both generated at JAX, as well as those donated from researchers around the world.

With their technical knowledge, JAX is able to operate as a high-quality “mini diagnostic hospital” to measure precise biological changes that accompany disease progression and recovery. JAX further has the ability to perform whole animal in vivo phenotyping including physiological, behavioral, sensory, cellular, and metabolic assays, in addition to in vivo imaging and high throughput phenotyping paradigms.

The ultimate goal of preclinical studies is to identify disease-relevant and translational endpoints that are robust, reliable, and reproducible, and that can be employed to evaluate the potential of novel therapeutic agents. Complex methods are employed for comprehensive neurophenotyping and pharmacological experiments using mouse models of neurodegeneration and are conducted by trained technicians with demonstrated proficiency.

With more than 90 years of experience and providing access to more than 11,000 unique strains, JAX is dedicated to providing the most appropriate, translationally-relevant animals models and assays to researchers worldwide.

References

1. Taylor et al., 2016. Decoding ALS: From Genes to Mechanism. Nature, 539(7628), 197—206.

2. Lutz C. 2018. Mouse Models of ALS: Past, Present and Future. Brain Research 2018.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →