Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

IV Therapies Transformed into Injections with a Novel Spray Drying Platform

Some drug treatments, particularly those that include high-dose protein-based therapeutics, are only available as an intravenous (IV) infusion. These protein therapeutics, which need to be delivered as dilute solutions that avoid protein aggregation and remain

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Some drug treatments, particularly those that include high-dose protein-based therapeutics, are only available as an intravenous (IV) infusion. These protein therapeutics, which need to be delivered as dilute solutions that avoid protein aggregation and remain stable, require high doses to be effective. Not only does this mean time-consuming treatments for patients, but this route of delivery also requires trained personnel and clinical infrastructure.

Now, researchers have developed a new delivery platform that allows these drugs to be stored and delivered in much higher concentrations. With this new formulation method, many protein therapeutics could be injected with a standard syringe or autoinjector device.

This work is published in Science Translational Medicine in the paper, “Ultra-high concentration biologic therapeutics enabled by spray drying with a glassy surfactant excipient.”

“This is a platform that potentially works with any biologic drug, so that we can inject it easily,” said Eric Appel, PhD, associate professor of materials science and engineering at Stanford University. “That takes these treatments from a several-hour ordeal at a clinic with an IV infusion to something you can do in seconds with an autoinjector at your house.”

When dissolved in high concentrations, many protein therapeutics are prone to aggregation, which makes them too viscous to inject or able to elicit an immune response.

“We ended up with something that looks like a candy-coated chocolate, where the protein is on the inside and our special polymer forms a solid, glassy coating on the outside,” Appel said.

The researchers mixed this powder into a liquid that suspends the drug particles, but won’t dissolve them. The MoNi coating prevents the particles from sticking together and keeps the proteins in a dry, stable state until the liquid suspension is injected into the body.

“Because the microparticles are spherical and have smooth surfaces, they’re able to roll over each other and still be able to go through tiny needles and be injected into a person, but you can hit really, really, high concentrations,” said Carolyn Jons, a doctoral student in Appel’s lab.

The researchers tested their method on three different proteins—albumin, human immunoglobulin, and a monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19. They were able to reach concentrations exceeding 500 mg/mL—more than double the concentration of typical liquid injections. The formulations also remained stable at a wider array of temperatures than typical liquid formulations.

Spray drying is a fairly common process in the pharmaceutical industry and MoNi has already been evaluated in several preclinical models with no adverse effects, so the researchers are optimistic that it will be able to be approved for clinical use. They have already licensed the technology to a local startup, which is working to refine the process and eventually use it to develop new drug products.

“There are a lot of molecules that are promising drugs, but that you cannot turn into a drug product because they’re just too unstable given the constraints of currently available technologies,” Appel said. “This platform is really sophisticated in its ability to stabilize proteins and enable new drug products that would not normally be feasible, and which can be administered in a way that is much less burdensome.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →