Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Investigators Implicate Sharpin Protein in Inflammation Triggered by Linear Ubiquitin

Mouse studies show protein mutations lead to chronic proliferative dermatitis. Two papers in Nature describe the role of the protein Sharpin (SHANK-associated RH domain interacting protein) in the inflammatory process triggered by the linear ubiquitin ligase c

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Mouse studies show protein mutations lead to chronic proliferative dermatitis.

Two papers in Nature describe the role of the protein Sharpin (SHANK-associated RH domain interacting protein) in the inflammatory process triggered by the linear ubiquitin ligase complex (LUBAC). In addition, research in mice by the teams in Japan, Germany, and the U.S., demonstrated that lack of sharpin leads to TNF-dependent inflammation of organs, and particularly the skin, characterized as chronic proliferative dermatitis with keratinocyte death. The research team led by Ivan Dikic, Ph.D., from Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, suggests that chronic proliferative dermatitis may in some cases result from mutations in a region of LUBAC, a feature that could lead to new approaches to targeted therapeutics for patients with relevant mutations.

Dr. Dikic and colleagues report their research in a paper titled, “SHARPIN forms a linear ubiquitin ligase complex regulating NF-κB activity and apoptosis.” The second Nature paper, by Osaka University in Japan’s Fuminori Tokunaga, Tomoko Nakagawa, is titled, “Sharpin is a component of the NF-κB-activating linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex.” Drs. Tokunaga and Nakagawa are also co-authors of the paper led by Dr. Dikic.

Dr. Dikic and colleagues report that Sharpin is a ubiquitin-binding and ubiquitin-like-domain containing protein that, when mutated in mice, results in immune system disorders and multiorgan inflammation. Their work has implicated Sharpin as a novel component of LUBAC, and suggests that a lack of Sharpin essentially causes dysregulation of NF-κB and apoptotic signaling pathways. The authors suggest this in turn explains the severe phenotypes displayed by chronic proliferative dermatitis (CPDM) in Sharpin-deficient mice.

The research has shown that Sharpin binds to the LUBAC subunit HOIP (also known as RNF31), and stimulates the formation of linear ubiquitin chains in vitro and in vivo. Coexpression of Sharpin and HOIP essentially promotes the linear ubiquitination of NEMO (also known as IKBKG), which is an an adaptor of IkB kinases (IKKs) and activates NF-κB signaling, the authors write. In contrast, Sharpin deficiency in mice impairs activation of the IKK complex and NF-κB in B cells, macrophages, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts. In addition, Sharpin deficiency was found to lead to rapid cell death upon tumor-necrosis factor α (TNF-α) stimulation via FADD and caspase-8-dependent pathways.

The Japanese team’s paper similarly identifies Sharpin as an additional component of LUBAC and reports that Sharpin-containing complexes can linearly ubiquitinate NEMO and activated NF-κB. The research confirmed that deleting Sharpin drastically reduced the amount of LUBAC, resulting in attenuated TNF-α and CD40-mediated activation of NF-kB in mouse embryonic fibroblasts or B cells from CPDM mice. They further suggest that given the pleomorphic phenotype of CPDM mice1, linear polyubiquitination by LUBAC may be involved in several disorders including chronic dermatitis and immunodeficiency. “Enhanced expression of Sharpin has been reported in various human cancers,” the authors note. “Enhanced expression of LUBAC increases NF-κB activation, indicating that overexpression of LUBAC may be involved in tumorigenesis through activation of the anti-apoptotic function of NF-κB.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →