Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

How Food Allergy Works — From Tolerance to Anaphylaxis

Food allergy (FA) is a global public health concern, with a prevalence of 5% in adults and 8% in children. Rates are higher in industrialized countries, reaching as high as 10% among infants in Australia . The rise in incidence is primarily attributable to env

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Food allergy (FA) is a global public health concern, with a prevalence of 5% in adults and 8% in children. Rates are higher in industrialized countries, reaching as high as 10% among infants in Australia . The rise in incidence is primarily attributable to environmental factors acting on a background of genetic susceptibility. FA differs from food intolerance in that it involves specific immunologic mechanisms.

Immunologic Classification

Food allergic reactions are divided into three categories based on the effector mechanism:

  • Immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated reactions: The most common form. Rapid onset (usually within 2 hours) due to the activation of specific IgE on mast cells and basophils. Includes oral allergy syndrome, urticaria , angioedema , bronchospasm, acute gastrointestinal symptoms, and anaphylaxis .
  • Mixed IgE- and cell-mediated reactions: Characteristic of atopic dermatitis , eosinophilic esophagitis , and other eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. The IgE component overlaps with chronic T-cell inflammation, resulting in a more subtle clinical presentation.
  • Non-IgE-mediated reactions: These include food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, allergic proctocolitis, protein enteropathy, and celiac disease . They are driven by T-cell responses with a delayed onset (hours to days) and predominantly gastrointestinal symptoms.

Pathogenesis

Physiologic Oral Tolerance

Under physiologic conditions, the gastrointestinal tract maintains active tolerance to food antigens. CD103+ dendritic cells convert vitamin A into retinoic acid, which induces FOXP3 and the differentiation of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs produce transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin (IL)-10, inducing antigen-specific suppression and isotype switching toward secretory IgA. CX3CR1+ macrophages and hepatic sinusoidal cells help complete the tolerogenic circuit.

Breakdown of Tolerance and Sensitization

Damage to the epithelial barrier — caused by loss-of-function mutations in filaggrin (FLG), skin inflammation, or exposure to harsh detergents — releases alarm cytokines (IL-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin) that activate dendritic cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells toward a pro-T helper 2 (TH2) phenotype. Activated dendritic cells express OX40L, promoting TH2 differentiation, the production of IL-4 and IL-13, isotype switching to IgE, and mast cell expansion. A critical positive feedback loop is the reprogramming of Tregs toward a TH2 phenotype with loss of their tolerogenic function.

Dual-Allergen Exposure Hypothesis

The dual-allergen exposure hypothesis, supported by the LEAP study , a randomized controlled trial, posits that low-dose cutaneous exposure to allergens through compromised skin induces sensitization, while high-dose oral exposure promotes tolerance. FLG mutations facilitate the transepidermal penetration of allergens and are associated with the persistence of milk and egg allergies over time. Although less common, sensitization may also occur via the respiratory route.

IgE-Mediated Effector Activation

Specific IgE binds to the Fc epsilon receptor I on mast cells and basophils. Subsequent contact with the allergen leads to receptor cross-linking, activation of spleen tyrosine kinase, degranulation with the release of histamine, tryptase, and platelet-activating factor, and de novo synthesis of leukotrienes and prostaglandins. Reaction severity depends on the characteristics of IgE, mast cell density, the presence of inhibitory IgG (via Fc gamma receptor IIb), and cofactors (physical exercise, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], alcohol, and viral infections).

Classification of Allergens

Thermostability and Gastrostability

The clinical relevance of an allergen depends on its resistance to cooking and acid-peptic digestion:

  • Thermolabile and gastrolabile proteins (PR-10 and profilins): denatured by cooking and digestion; they primarily trigger oral allergy syndrome and rarely cause systemic reactions.
  • Thermostable and gastroresistant proteins (nonspecific lipid transfer proteins, 2S albumins, casein, ovomucoid, tropomyosin, and parvalbumin): reach the intestinal mucosa intact; they are responsible for severe systemic reactions and anaphylaxis.

The following table classifies the 12 main allergenic families based on these properties and clinical risk. Table. Classification of the 12 Main Allergen Families by Stability and Clinical Risk

  • Protein family | Thermostability | Gastrostability | Main examples | Clinical risk | Diagnostic notes
  • PR-10 (Bet v 1 homologs) | Thermolabile | Gastrolabile | Apple/Mal d 1; Hazelnut/Cor a 1; Soy/Gly m 4; Peach/Pru p 1; Peanut/Ara h 8 | Mild reactions, predominantly oral (oral allergy syndrome). Gly m 4 can cause systemic reactions. | Cross-reactivity with Bet v 1 (birch). CRD useful for distinguishing from systemic risk allergens.
  • nsLTP | Thermostable | Gastroresistant | Peach/Pru p 3; Hazelnut/Cor a 8; Walnut/Jug r 3; Wheat/Tri a 14; Cannabis/Can s 3 | High systemic risk: urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis. Leading cause of primary FA and anaphylaxis in adults in the Mediterranean region. | Cofactors (NSAIDs, alcohol, exercise) amplify reactivity. CRD on Pru p 3 for the primary sensitizer.
  • 2S albumins (prolamins) | Thermostable | Gastroresistant | Peanut/Ara h 2,6; Walnut/Jug r 1; Cashew/Ana o 3; Sesame/Ses i 1; Mustard/Sin a 1 | Primary marker of severe anaphylaxis. Ara h 2 is the most potent activator of mast cells and basophils. | Diagnostic gold standard for peanut allergy. High specificity and PPV.
  • Vicillins/legumins (cupin) | Thermostable | Gastroresistant | Peanut/Ara h 1,3; Walnut/Jug r 2; Hazelnut/Cor a 9,14; Cashew/Ana o 1,2 | High systemic risk, especially with cosensitization to 2S albumin. Cross-reactivity between legumes and tree nuts. | Cross-inhibition with Ara h 2 may cause false positives; recombinant allergens are preferred.
  • Wheat prolamins (omega-5 gliadin and LMW-GS) | Partially stable | Gastroresistant | Wheat/Tri a 19 (omega-5 gliadin); Wheat/Tri a 36 (LMW-GS) | omega-5 gliadin: marker of WDEIA and severe wheat allergy in children. | Tri a 19 sIgE: test of choice for WDEIA. OFC with cofactor (exercise ± NSAIDs).
  • Profilins | Thermolabile | Gastrolabile | Pan-allergen: Bet v 2; Phl p 12; Hev b 8; present in many fruits and vegetables | Mild-to-moderate reactions, predominantly oral. Rarely systemic. | Sensitization often secondary to pollen. A positive result does not justify elimination without OFC.
  • Casein and whey proteins | Stable (casein); labile (whey) | Resistant (casein) | Milk/Bos d 8 (casein); Bos d 4 (alpha-lactalbumin); Bos d 5 (beta-lactoglobulin) | Casein: persistent allergy and reactivity to baked milk. Whey proteins: markers of tolerance to baked milk. | Casein sIgE > 2.6 kUA/L: cutoff for fresh milk allergy. Indicates need for the baked milk protocol.
  • Ovomucoid/ovalbumin | Stable (ovomucoid); labile (ovalbumin) | Resistant (ovomucoid) | Egg/Gal d 1 (ovomucoid); Gal d 2 (ovalbumin); Gal d 3 (ovotransferrin) | Ovomucoid: reaction also to cooked egg. Ovalbumin: often tolerated in cooked egg. | sIgE ovomucoid > 0.8 kUA/L guides the reintroduction strategy (baked egg ladder).
  • Tropomyosin (crustaceans and mollusks) | Thermostable | Gastroresistant | Shrimp/Pen a 1; Crab/Cha f 1; Squid/Tod p 1; Mite/Der p 10 | High systemic risk: urticaria, angioedema, and severe anaphylaxis. Reactions may also occur from cooking vapors. | sIgE Pen a 1: marker of systemic risk. Cross-reactivity with mites (crustacean-mite syndrome). Frequent polysensitization.
  • Parvalbumin (fish) | Thermostable | Gastroresistant | Cod/Gad c 1; Salmon/Sal s 1; Tuna/Thu a 1; Carp/Cyp c 1 | High systemic risk. Extensive cross-reactivity among fish species. Reactions can also be triggered by cooking vapors. | sIgE Gad c 1: pan-fish marker. Cooking does not eliminate allergenicity. CRD to distinguish primary allergy from cross-reactions.
  • Hevein and chitinase (latex-fruit syndrome) | Hev b 6 labile; chitinase stable | Variable | Latex/Hev b 6 (hevein); Avocado/Pers a 1; Banana/Mus xp 1; Kiwi/Act d 2; Chestnut/Cas s 5; Tomato/Lyc e 3 | Latex-fruit syndrome. High risk in healthcare workers and children with spina bifida or multiple surgeries. | sIgE Hev b 6: latex-fruit cross-reactivity. Hev b 5 and Hev b 13: primary sensitization to latex.
  • Alpha-gal (oligosaccharide) | Heat-stable | Gastroresistant | Mammalian meats (beef, pork or lamb); medications containing gelatin | Delayed reactions (3-6 hours), often nocturnal. Urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis. Associated with tick bites. | Anti-alpha-gal IgE assay. Delayed onset due to slow lipid absorption.
  • CRD = component-resolved diagnostics; FA = food allergy; IgE = immunoglobulin E; LMW-GS = low molecular weight glutenin subunits; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; nsLTP = nonspecific lipid transfer protein; OFC = oral food challenge; PPV = positive predictive value; PR-10 = pathogenesis-related protein class 10; sIgE = serum-specific IgE; WDEIA = wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis

Allergens of Clinical Significance

  • Peanuts: Ara h 2 (a 2S albumin ) is the primary diagnostic marker and the most potent mast cell activator. In practice, it is more informative than whole-extract food-specific IgE testing. The use of recombinant allergens via component-resolved diagnostics is recommended to avoid false positives due to cross-reactivity.
  • Crustaceans and mollusks: Tropomyosin Pen a 1 is heat-stable and gastroresistant. Severe reactions can occur even from cooking vapors. Cross-reactivity with Der p 10 from dust mites is clinically relevant, giving rise to the so-called crustacean-mite syndrome.
  • Fish: Parvalbumin (Gad c 1 in cod) is heat-stable and serves as a pan-fish marker. Cooking does not eliminate its allergenicity. Extensive cross-reactivity among different species often necessitates avoiding multiple fish species.
  • Latex-fruit syndrome: Sensitization to latex occurs via inhalation or contact (healthcare workers and children with spina bifida ). Cross-reactivity with avocado, banana, kiwi, chestnut, and tomato via class I chitinases. Hev b 6: marker of cross-reactivity; Hev b 5 and Hev b 13: primary sensitization.
  • Alpha-gal: An emerging allergy associated with the bite of the tick Ixodes ricinus (the primary vector in Europe). The alpha-gal oligosaccharide in mammalian meats causes delayed reactions, usually 3-6 hours after ingestion, because of slow lipid absorption.

Clinical Presentations

IgE-mediated FA can affect the skin, respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, and cardiovascular system. Symptoms appear within 2 hours of ingestion, with variability depending on dose, food form, and other cofactors.

  • Anaphylaxis: This typically involves at least two organs or systems. The World Allergy Organization criteria require an acute onset with cutaneous/mucosal involvement associated with respiratory, cardiovascular, or gastrointestinal symptoms. Cow’s milk, peanuts, tree nuts, and shellfish are the leading causes of fatal anaphylaxis. Normal tryptase levels do not rule out food-induced anaphylaxis.
  • Oral allergy syndrome: The most common FA in adults, characterized by itching and mild oropharyngeal edema within minutes of eating raw fruits or vegetables that cross-react with pollens (PR-10 and profilins). Rarely systemic due to the thermal and digestive lability of the responsible proteins.
  • Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis : The reaction is triggered only in the presence of a cofactor, typically exercise. The allergen is almost invariably omega-5 gliadin (Tri a 19).

Role of the Microbiome

The gut microbiome may alter susceptibility to FA through several mechanisms, such as modulating IgE production. Unlike other Igs, IgE levels rise in the absence of the gut microbiome (as shown in germ-free mouse models). In addition to promoting a regulatory environment in the gut, the gut microbiome influences intestinal barrier function and may promote IgA production, which can contribute to tolerance through antigen exclusion. Variations in gut microbiome composition have also been linked to differences in the natural history of FA. The gut microbiome can interact with other important environmental factors, such as diet, to suppress or modulate the development of FA. Dietary fiber is metabolized by anaerobic bacteria into short-chain fatty acids, such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate. High-fiber diets induce short-chain fatty acid production and suppress FA in a gut microbiota-dependent manner in animal models. Whether the gut microbiome can be manipulated for the prevention and treatment of FA in humans remains an open question.

Clinical Takeaways

Understanding the pathogenesis of FA, together with the biochemical classification of allergens based on thermostability and gastrostability, forms the foundation for a personalized diagnostic approach. Knowledge of the risk profile of allergen families guides molecular diagnostics and dietary recommendations. Erna Cecilia Lorenzini is a professor of general pathology and nutrition at the University of Milan, Milan, Italy, where she teaches across undergraduate programs in the Faculty of Medicine and the School of Specialization in Food Science. She holds a degree in medicine and a PhD in experimental pathology and conducted research at the Department of Molecular Biology at the University of California, San Diego. She is a specialist in food science and clinical nutrition and collaborates with Italy’s National Research Council on projects involving the microbiome and clinical decision support systems. This story was translated from Univadis Italy , part of the Medscape Professional Network.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01When in Doubt, How Useful Are Biomarkers?

As a biomarker of atopy, a blood eosinophil count of at least 150/mm 3 is associated with asthma symptoms and exacerbations. Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) indicates allergic sensitization associated with asthma. Finally, elevated fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (> 20-25 parts per billion depending on age) is associated with wheezing, corticosteroid use, and persistent asthma. The combination of atopy markers — including maternal allergy, eczema, wheezing, positive specific IgE levels, and eosinophilia — significantly increases the likelihood of asthma. “However, when diagnostic uncertainty persists in a child younger than 5 years (absence of atopy; normal PFTs — which is common), a trial of treatment based on initial symptoms may be recommended according to GINA 2025 (Box 10-2) ,” explained Bourgoin-Heck. In the presence of mild and intermittent symptoms, a short-acting bronchodilator challenge test on demand is indicated for a maximum duration of 2-3 months. This strategy applies to infrequent wheezing episodes, without the need for emergency care and therefore without any severe exacerbations, with symptoms occurring twice or less per week. Treatment consists of administering two puffs when symptoms occur (to be repeated as needed), with an assessment of improvement within 20-60 minutes. In cases of a history of a severe wheezing episode within the past year (systemic corticosteroids, emergency department visit, and hospitalization) or symptoms more than twice a week, the therapeutic trial involves long-term inhaled corticosteroids (eg, fluticasone 100 µg/d to 250 µg/d) combined with a short-acting bronchodilator as needed for 2-3 months. If the response is favorable, treatment is adjusted to the minimum effective dose. Monitoring of clinical progress relies on asthma control scores such as the Asthma Control Test , considering both parental perception and the child’s self-assessment. Because the goal in mild asthma is indeed to achieve complete control.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02What Is the 10-Year Outlook?

Current data show that complications are rare, about 2%-3%. At 10 years, nearly 90% of implants are still intact, according to Sofcep data. Deterioration is slow and gradual, and even in the event of a rupture, it is often asymptomatic and poses no immediate serious risk. There is generally no urgency to replace an implant, the surgeon explained. “Routine replacement is not warranted. I have no reason to operate and replace the implants if everything is medically fine. The most common reason for replacing implants is the patient’s desire to do so for aesthetic reasons,” emphasized the speaker, who noted that weight fluctuations, pregnancies, and natural aging play a significant role in how the aesthetic outcome evolves.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03A Future Impact on Clinical Events?

The consequences of TAVI with less favorable hemodynamic parameters generally result in an increase in clinical events starting at 3 years, he explained. Compared to patients receiving a prosthesis with better hemodynamic outcomes, the mortality curve begins to diverge after 3 years. We should therefore see a clinical difference within the next 2 years. We must now await the results of the planned 5-year follow-up for this trial to confirm an effect on the primary endpoint, which is the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke , or rehospitalization for heart failure . When asked to comment on the results following the presentation, Anna Petronio , cardiologist, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, noted that the latest generation of balloon-expandable valves was not included in the study. “We now have a fifth generation of balloon-expandable valves. It has a larger valve surface area and a lower aortic gradient than previous models. Would the results be different with these new-generation valves?” the cardiologist wondered.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04And Then?

At steps 4 and 5, treatment escalation primarily relies on a medium dose of ICS, always combined with a LABA. Before considering a high dose or further escalation, the addition of a second long-acting bronchodilator, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), may be proposed ( moderate-dose ICS-LABA-LAMA ). The goal is to limit the use of high doses of ICS as much as possible by maintaining treatment around an effective moderate dose.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05What Is the Scientific Evidence?

To assess the effectiveness and safety of these creams, American researchers set out to evaluate 189 homemade sunscreen recipes available on the social media platform Pinterest. The results found that 95.2% of the recipes claimed to be effective. SPF claims appeared in 33.3% of the recipes, with reported values ranging from SPF 20 to SPF 50. However, 68.3% of the recommended recipes provided insufficient protection against UV rays. The authors noted that in this sample of posts, 41.8% had been saved by other users between one and more than 21,000 times, indicating significant interest in “health” information from this social media platform. “This study revealed widespread interest in and acceptance of inadequate information regarding sun protection,” the authors noted. More recently, the authors of an Australian study tested the effectiveness of a natural, homemade sunscreen posted online by a wellness blogger to determine its photoprotective properties — beyond its ability to protect against erythema — compared with a commercially available SPF 50+ sunscreen. The DIY cream contained almond oil, coconut oil, shea butter, beeswax, red raspberry seed oil, carrot seed oil, and zinc oxide. Skin explants were treated with either a commercial SPF 50+ sunscreen or the homemade sunscreen before being exposed to UV rays. Analysis of these skin explants showed that the homemade cream reduced UV-induced damage to DNA and epidermal thickness but did not effectively protect against the formation of sunburn cells. In comparison, the SPF 50+ sunscreen provided effective protection against all parameters studied. The researchers concluded that there is currently no evidence supporting the effectiveness of homemade sunscreen in preventing skin carcinogenesis. They explained that enhanced DNA repair in the first few hours after irradiation does not necessarily mean that apoptosis is prevented 24 hours after UV exposure. They therefore recommended the continued use of approved commercial sunscreens. Finally, in practice, errors in preparing homemade sunscreen formulations cannot be ruled out, particularly when using approximate measurements such as cups, teaspoons, or tablespoons, which can result in formulations that vary from person to person. Without rigorous testing and regulation, as is the case with commercial sunscreens, DIY sunscreens can result in highly variable levels of photoprotection and thus potentially increase the risk for skin cancer. Additionally, the absence of so-called chemical preservatives requires very strict hygiene conditions and increases the risk for bacterial contamination or mold growth. Giordano-Labadie disclosed having no relevant financial relationships. This story was translated from Medscape’s French edition.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →