Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Why Does the Heart Rarely Develop Cancer?

The heart is one of the organs least likely to develop cancer, a long-standing biologic puzzle that may now have an explanation. A study published in Science found that the mechanical load generated by the beating heart suppresses tumor cell proliferation thro

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

The heart is one of the organs least likely to develop cancer, a long-standing biologic puzzle that may now have an explanation. A study published in Science found that the mechanical load generated by the beating heart suppresses tumor cell proliferation through a molecular pathway that alters gene expression, raising the possibility of new therapeutic targets.

Mechanical Protection

Tumors that originate directly in the myocardium are exceptionally rare, occurring in < 1% of autopsies. Even cardiac metastases, which have been reported in up to 18% of autopsies, are often small, asymptomatic, and incidentally discovered. Although this phenomenon has long been recognized, its biologic basis remains unclear. The heart is notable for its limited capacity for regeneration. After birth, cardiomyocytes stop dividing and subsequently renew at a rate of approximately 1% per year. However, when the mechanical load is reduced, such as in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices, cardiomyocytes once again show signs of proliferation. This observation prompted researchers to investigate whether the same mechanical load that restrains normal cardiac cells might also suppress cancer growth.

More Load, Less Growth

To investigate this question, researchers introduced two genetic alterations commonly found in human cancers, activation of the KRAS oncogene and loss of the TP53 , into the liver, skeletal muscle, and hearts of mice. Tumors developed in multiple organs, but not in the heart. The researchers then used a heterotopic heart transplant model in which a donor mouse’s heart is surgically connected to the neck (cervical) or abdominal vessels of a recipient mouse. The transplanted heart remained perfused but lost its normal mechanical loading (constant beating). When researchers injected lung adenocarcinoma cells into two different hearts of the same animal, they observed entirely different outcomes. The cancer cells did not grow in the native mechanically loaded heart. However, the same cells grew rapidly and extensively in the mechanically unloaded transplanted heart. Tumor cells had replaced nearly all normal tissue in the unloaded heart, whereas they occupied only approximately 20% of the ventricle in the native heart in 14 days. This difference could not be explained by differences in the initial tumor engraftment or cell death. Instead, the findings pointed to substantial differences in tumor cell proliferation. Similar results were observed in bioengineered cardiac tissues exposed to varying degrees of mechanical stress. Tumor cells proliferated under conditions of low mechanical load but ceased proliferating as the mechanical load increased. Tumor growth was lowest in regions exposed to the greatest mechanical stimulation of cardiomyocytes in vitro. However, the possibility of metabolic competition between cardiac and tumor cells for nutrition was ruled out.

From Mechanics to Genes

Next, we examined the influence of mechanical forces on tumor cell behavior. Gene expression analyses of both human cardiac metastases and mouse tumor cells showed that mechanical stimulation altered chromatin accessibility through the activation of genes involved in chromatin remodeling. These changes promoted the expression of genes that suppress cell division. The study also identified Nesprin-2, a part of the linker of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex, which acts as a physical bridge. It is a multitasking protein that connects the cell’s outer structural network (cytoskeleton) to its inner genetic storage (nucleus) and appears to play a significant role in converting mechanical signals into changes in gene expression. When Nesprin-2 was inactivated, cancer cells resumed proliferation despite exposure to a mechanical load, both in engineered tissues and animal models. “Collectively, these results shed light on the role of mechanical forces in protecting the heart from cancer and may pave the way to cancer therapies based on mechanical stimulation,” concluded the authors.

An Actively Protected Organ

Speaking with Univadis Italy , part of the Medscape Professional Network, Giorgio Scita, PhD, director of the Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Migration research unit at AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology and professor of general pathology at the University of Milan in Milan, Italy, said, “The study addressed a simple but fundamental question: Why is the heart largely resistant to cancer despite being highly vascularized and continuously exposed to circulating tumor cells? These findings suggest that the heartbeat itself creates a mechanical environment that is hostile to tumor growth. The compressive forces generated by rhythmic myocardial contraction are sensed by cancer cells and translated into biochemical signals that limit their proliferation. In this view, the heart is not simply an organ that is unfavorable for cancer growth but a tissue actively protected by its own mechanical forces.” Speaking with Univadis Italy , Serena Zacchigna, PhD, study co-author and head of the Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy, said, “Until now, however, attention had focused primarily on signals from the extracellular matrix, such as tissue stiffness. Our study adds a new element: even forces generated directly by the movement of an organ — in this case, cardiac contraction — can influence the growth of cancer cells.”

Beyond the Heart

Scita said the findings have implications that extend well beyond the heart. “The most significant aspect is that this work identifies tissue mechanics as an active regulator of tumor behavior,” he said. Stiffness, compression, tension, and confinement are not merely consequences of tumor growth, but factors capable of influencing proliferation, invasion, and dormancy. The concept may apply to many solid tumors. Scita noted that cancer cells growing in confined environments, such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, are exposed to substantial mechanical constraints. Understanding why some tumor cells remain susceptible to these forces whereas others evade them and become invasive remains a major unanswered question in cancer biology. Research on these mechanisms is expanding internationally and in Italy as well. One example is the AIRC “5 per mille” ( 5 per thousand ) research programs on metastatic disease, which includes projects designed to clarify how the mechanical properties of tumor tissue influence cancer initiation, metastatic spread, and disease progression.

Therapeutic Potential

According to Zacchigna, these findings open two principal avenues for future research. “The first focuses on mechanical stimulation itself. In collaboration with engineers at the University of Siena, including a group led by Domenico Prattichizzo, researchers are developing wearable robotic devices designed to mimic the heartbeat and deliver mechanical stimulation to superficial solid tumors such as certain skin cancers. The second approach is pharmacology. Researchers are investigating whether epigenetic therapies capable of modifying chromatin remodeling can reproduce the effects of cardiac contraction and suppress tumor cell proliferation. However, Zacchigna cautioned that this work remains at an early experimental phase.” However, before therapeutic applications can be pursued, important mechanistic questions remain unanswered. Zacchigna noted that although the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex and Nesprin-2 are involved in signal transduction leading to chromatin reorganization and activation of cell cycle inhibitory loci, the molecular intermediates involved have yet to be fully defined. Researchers also need to determine which genes are most critical, whether the mechanism operates across different tumor types, and whether it can be safely manipulated for therapeutic purposes. In an accompanying commentary published in Science , Wyatt G. Paltzer, PhD, and James F. Martin, MD, from the Department of Integrative Physiology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, noted that the findings suggest enhancing LINC complex activity could potentially suppress tumor growth. However, because the complex has broad biologic functions, it may prove difficult to target therapeutically. The authors suggested that future studies should focus on identifying proteins that interact with Nesprin-2 or other components of the LINC complex and play a more specific role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.

Looking Ahead

Despite these challenges, Scita said that the study’s conceptual significance is already clear. “Even if therapeutic applications remain years away, the findings suggest that cancer may one day be targeted by altering how tumor cells perceive and interpret physical forces.” Scita and Zacchigna reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. This story was translated from Univadis Italy .

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01And Then?

At steps 4 and 5, treatment escalation primarily relies on a medium dose of ICS, always combined with a LABA. Before considering a high dose or further escalation, the addition of a second long-acting bronchodilator, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), may be proposed ( moderate-dose ICS-LABA-LAMA ). The goal is to limit the use of high doses of ICS as much as possible by maintaining treatment around an effective moderate dose.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02What Is the Scientific Evidence?

To assess the effectiveness and safety of these creams, American researchers set out to evaluate 189 homemade sunscreen recipes available on the social media platform Pinterest. The results found that 95.2% of the recipes claimed to be effective. SPF claims appeared in 33.3% of the recipes, with reported values ranging from SPF 20 to SPF 50. However, 68.3% of the recommended recipes provided insufficient protection against UV rays. The authors noted that in this sample of posts, 41.8% had been saved by other users between one and more than 21,000 times, indicating significant interest in “health” information from this social media platform. “This study revealed widespread interest in and acceptance of inadequate information regarding sun protection,” the authors noted. More recently, the authors of an Australian study tested the effectiveness of a natural, homemade sunscreen posted online by a wellness blogger to determine its photoprotective properties — beyond its ability to protect against erythema — compared with a commercially available SPF 50+ sunscreen. The DIY cream contained almond oil, coconut oil, shea butter, beeswax, red raspberry seed oil, carrot seed oil, and zinc oxide. Skin explants were treated with either a commercial SPF 50+ sunscreen or the homemade sunscreen before being exposed to UV rays. Analysis of these skin explants showed that the homemade cream reduced UV-induced damage to DNA and epidermal thickness but did not effectively protect against the formation of sunburn cells. In comparison, the SPF 50+ sunscreen provided effective protection against all parameters studied. The researchers concluded that there is currently no evidence supporting the effectiveness of homemade sunscreen in preventing skin carcinogenesis. They explained that enhanced DNA repair in the first few hours after irradiation does not necessarily mean that apoptosis is prevented 24 hours after UV exposure. They therefore recommended the continued use of approved commercial sunscreens. Finally, in practice, errors in preparing homemade sunscreen formulations cannot be ruled out, particularly when using approximate measurements such as cups, teaspoons, or tablespoons, which can result in formulations that vary from person to person. Without rigorous testing and regulation, as is the case with commercial sunscreens, DIY sunscreens can result in highly variable levels of photoprotection and thus potentially increase the risk for skin cancer. Additionally, the absence of so-called chemical preservatives requires very strict hygiene conditions and increases the risk for bacterial contamination or mold growth. Giordano-Labadie disclosed having no relevant financial relationships. This story was translated from Medscape’s French edition.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03When in Doubt, How Useful Are Biomarkers?

As a biomarker of atopy, a blood eosinophil count of at least 150/mm 3 is associated with asthma symptoms and exacerbations. Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) indicates allergic sensitization associated with asthma. Finally, elevated fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (> 20-25 parts per billion depending on age) is associated with wheezing, corticosteroid use, and persistent asthma. The combination of atopy markers — including maternal allergy, eczema, wheezing, positive specific IgE levels, and eosinophilia — significantly increases the likelihood of asthma. “However, when diagnostic uncertainty persists in a child younger than 5 years (absence of atopy; normal PFTs — which is common), a trial of treatment based on initial symptoms may be recommended according to GINA 2025 (Box 10-2) ,” explained Bourgoin-Heck. In the presence of mild and intermittent symptoms, a short-acting bronchodilator challenge test on demand is indicated for a maximum duration of 2-3 months. This strategy applies to infrequent wheezing episodes, without the need for emergency care and therefore without any severe exacerbations, with symptoms occurring twice or less per week. Treatment consists of administering two puffs when symptoms occur (to be repeated as needed), with an assessment of improvement within 20-60 minutes. In cases of a history of a severe wheezing episode within the past year (systemic corticosteroids, emergency department visit, and hospitalization) or symptoms more than twice a week, the therapeutic trial involves long-term inhaled corticosteroids (eg, fluticasone 100 µg/d to 250 µg/d) combined with a short-acting bronchodilator as needed for 2-3 months. If the response is favorable, treatment is adjusted to the minimum effective dose. Monitoring of clinical progress relies on asthma control scores such as the Asthma Control Test , considering both parental perception and the child’s self-assessment. Because the goal in mild asthma is indeed to achieve complete control.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04A Future Impact on Clinical Events?

The consequences of TAVI with less favorable hemodynamic parameters generally result in an increase in clinical events starting at 3 years, he explained. Compared to patients receiving a prosthesis with better hemodynamic outcomes, the mortality curve begins to diverge after 3 years. We should therefore see a clinical difference within the next 2 years. We must now await the results of the planned 5-year follow-up for this trial to confirm an effect on the primary endpoint, which is the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke , or rehospitalization for heart failure . When asked to comment on the results following the presentation, Anna Petronio , cardiologist, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, noted that the latest generation of balloon-expandable valves was not included in the study. “We now have a fifth generation of balloon-expandable valves. It has a larger valve surface area and a lower aortic gradient than previous models. Would the results be different with these new-generation valves?” the cardiologist wondered.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
05What Is the 10-Year Outlook?

Current data show that complications are rare, about 2%-3%. At 10 years, nearly 90% of implants are still intact, according to Sofcep data. Deterioration is slow and gradual, and even in the event of a rupture, it is often asymptomatic and poses no immediate serious risk. There is generally no urgency to replace an implant, the surgeon explained. “Routine replacement is not warranted. I have no reason to operate and replace the implants if everything is medically fine. The most common reason for replacing implants is the patient’s desire to do so for aesthetic reasons,” emphasized the speaker, who noted that weight fluctuations, pregnancies, and natural aging play a significant role in how the aesthetic outcome evolves.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →