Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Designer Proteins May Lead to Tailored Protein-Protein Interactions

When attempting to master a new subject, it is usually advisable to seize its trunk, and avoid flailing about the branches. With proteins, however, most studies have focused on side chains, not backbones. Altering protein backbones has simply been beyond tradi

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

When attempting to master a new subject, it is usually advisable to seize its trunk, and avoid flailing about the branches. With proteins, however, most studies have focused on side chains, not backbones. Altering protein backbones has simply been beyond traditional methods of protein mutagenesis. And so it has been difficult to evaluate the importance of backbone-to-backbone hydrogen bonding in protein folding, protein stability, and protein-protein binding.

In recent years, however, biological and chemical techniques have been combined in novel ways to expose protein backbones to closer scrutiny. In particular, these techniques make it possible to insert amide-to-ester mutations in protein backbones, resulting in semisynthetic, or designer, proteins. Once created, these designer proteins can be examined systematically. It is even possible to evaluate the importance of individual hydrogen bonds for ligand binding.

A research group that is pushing semisynthetic proteins into new territory is based at the Center for Biopharmaceuticals at the University of Copenhagen. The group, which is led by Kristian Stromgaard, published their most recent study January 29 in Nature Communications, in an article entitled “Probing backbone hydrogen bonding in PDZ/ligand interactions by protein amide-to-ester mutations.” In this article, the authors describe how they generated semisynthetic PDZ domains containing backbone amide-to-ester mutations. PDZ domains are scaffolding modules in protein-protein interactions that mediate numerous physiological functions.

In other words, the researchers made miniscule changes in the backbone of in one of the most frequently occurring protein domains. Ultimately, they “created 22 completely new designer proteins on the basis of recognized material,” said Soren W. Pedersen, a postdoc in Stromgaard’s group. “We then examined how the designer proteins bind to other proteins in the body, which allowed us to analyze the role of the specific protein domain in the body’s vital signal processes.”

The authors found “substantial and differential effects upon amide-to-ester mutation in PDZ2 of postsynaptic density protein 95 and other PDZ domains, suggesting that hydrogen bonding at the carboxylate-binding site contributes to both affinity and selectivity.” In addition, they noted that the hydrogen bonding pattern is surprisingly different between the canonical and noncanonical interactions.

Reflecting on the significance of these results, Pedersen commented, “Designer proteins [may] bind to a range of receptors in the body—receptor interactions that are important targets for pharmaceuticals intended to treat stroke, pain, and depression. The new findings mean that in the long term, we will be able to design pharmaceuticals that bind more strongly and more accurately to specific sites in the organism.”

Even more intriguingly, designer proteins may enable new receptor-interaction strategies. For example, rather than develop a pharmaceutical that affects a receptor directly, one may create one that alters the interactions that the receptor has with proteins inside the cell. In other words, instead of simply switching the function of the receptor on and off, one may effectively install a dimmer switch.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →