Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Cross-Reactive Antibodies Link Multiple Sclerosis to Common Virus

Researchers at Karolinska Institute in Sweden have found further evidence for how the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can trigger multiple sclerosis (MS) or drive disease progression. Through a study in humans and in mice, the researchers discovered that some individ

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Researchers at Karolinska Institute in Sweden have found further evidence for how the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can trigger multiple sclerosis (MS) or drive disease progression. Through a study in humans and in mice, the researchers discovered that some individuals have antibodies against the virus that mistakenly attack a protein in the brain and spinal cord called alpha-crystallin B (CRYAB). Reporting on their findings in Science Advances “Cross-reactive EBNA1 immunity targets alpha-crystallin B and is associated with multiple sclerosis,” the team said their findings offer up additional evidence regarding the mechanistic link between EBV infection and MS. “This study provides further evidence that molecular mimicry contributes to pathological mechanisms linking EBV with MS.”

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS), which it is believed is caused by an interplay of environmental factors and genetic risk, the authors wrote. It is also well established that Epstein-Barr virus infection is associated with an increased risk of MS and is a prerequisite for disease development, they pointed out. “In addition, aspects of EBV infection interact with both genetic and environmental risk factors, and combinations are associated with markedly increased MS risk.” However, the mechanisms of these associations aren’t fully understood. More than 90% of the population is infected with EBV, so there must be other mechanisms underlying the link between MS and EBV, as only a few people will develop MS.

EBV infects most people early in life and then remains in the body, usually without causing symptoms. The link between EBV and the neurological disease multiple sclerosis (MS) was discovered many years ago and has puzzled researchers ever since. Increasing evidence, including two papers published in Science and Nature last year, suggests that EBV infection precedes MS and that antibodies against the virus may be involved. However, the molecular mechanisms seem to vary between patients and remain largely unknown.

For their study the researchers analysed blood samples from more than 700 persons with MS (pwMS) and 700 healthy individuals. They found that antibodies that bind to the EBV protein Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1), can also bind to a similar protein in the brain and spinal cord called CRYAB, whose role is to prevent protein aggregation during conditions of cellular stress such as inflammation. “CRYAB is expressed in oligodendrocytes in MS lesions and may have a protective effect by down-regulating proinflammatory responses of innate immune cells,” the team noted.

These misdirected, cross-reactive antibodies may damage the nervous system and cause severe symptoms in MS patients, including problems with balance, mobility and fatigue. The antibodies were present in about 23% of MS patients and 7% of control individuals.

“This shows that, whilst these antibody responses are not required for disease development, they may be involved in disease in up to a quarter of MS patients,” said Olivia Thomas, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute and co-first author of the paper. “This also demonstrates the high variation between patients, highlighting the need for personalized therapies. Current therapies are effective at reducing relapses in MS but unfortunately, none can prevent disease progression.”

The researchers also found that there is likely a similar cross-reactivity among T cells of the immune system. “Evidence for T cell cross-reactivity was obtained in mice between EBNA1 and CRYAB, and increased CRYAB and EBNA1 CD4+ T cell responses were detected in natalizumab-treated pwMS,” the team wrote. “This study provides evidence for antibody cross-reactivity between EBNA1 and CRYAB and points to a similar cross-reactivity in T cells, further demonstrating the role of EBV adaptive immune responses in MS development.” Interestingly, they pointed out, “The historical role of CRYAB as an autoantigen in MS has been controversial since its first discovery almost 30 years ago.”

Commenting on the collective results of previous research, the team further stated, “Together, it is possible that CRYAB has a neuroprotective function, which could explain its treatment effect in neuroinflammatory models, while autoreactivity against it could reverse this role … Thus, a role for CRYAB in both neuroprotection and also as an autoantigen target driving autoimmunity is not mutually exclusive.”

“MS is an incredibly complex disease, but our study provides an important piece in the puzzle and could explain why some people develop the disease,” Thomas added. “We have discovered that certain antibodies against the Epstein-Barr virus, which would normally fight the infection, can mistakenly target the brain and spinal cord and cause damage.”

Added co-first author Mattias Bronge, affiliated researcher at the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, “We are now expanding our research to investigate how T cells fight EBV infection and how these immune cells may damage the nervous system in multiple sclerosis and contribute to disease progression.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →