Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

BMS Extends Immuno-Oncology Collaboration with Five Prime

Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) will extend for a year its nearly 3-year-old collaboration with Five Prime Therapeutics to discover, develop, and commercialize immuno-oncology therapies directed toward targets in three undisclosed immune checkpoint pathways. BMS ha

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) will extend for a year its nearly 3-year-old collaboration with Five Prime Therapeutics to discover, develop, and commercialize immuno-oncology therapies directed toward targets in three undisclosed immune checkpoint pathways.

BMS has exercised its option to extend the research term from March 2017 to March 2018 and will provide additional research funding for the additional year, Five Prime said yesterday. BMS has agreed to use Five Prime's discovery capabilities to advance the three immuno-oncology programs toward identifying drug candidates for continued R&D.

Drug candidates may be studied either as single agents or in combination with marketed BMS immuno-oncology therapies, or others in development.

BMS has advanced the first antibody from the collaboration to IND-enabling activities, Five Prime said, while continuing with Five Prime to work on antibody drug candidates targeting these pathways.

“Together, we have made significant progress that includes an antibody candidate that could lead to an IND application for our collaborator,” Luis Borges, Ph.D., Five Prime svp of research, said in a statement. “We are pleased that the demonstrated productivity of our unique research capabilities has prompted Bristol-Myers Squibb, a clear leader in immuno-oncology, to invest further in our efforts to find new drug candidates to modulate three checkpoint pathways.”

The companies agreed that BMS will obtain exclusive, worldwide rights to develop and commercialize products directed toward undisclosed protein targets in the three checkpoint pathways identified by Five Prime before and during the collaboration. BMS paid a $20 million up-front fee to Five Prime and agreed to provide up to $11.6 million in research funding over the entire research term.

Five Prime will be eligible to receive up to $300 million tied to achieving development, regulatory, and sales-based milestone payments per collaboration product and tiered mid-single-digit rising to low-double-digit royalty payments on net sales of each product commercialized by BMS. The development milestone payments include $5 million upon filing of the first IND application by BMS.

The companies launched their up-to-$350.5 million collaboration in March 2014, focusing on two undisclosed immune checkpoint pathways. In January 2016, the companies added a third immune checkpoint pathway to the collaboration—3 months after signing a separate up-to-$1.74 billion agreement for BMS to co-develop and co-commercialize Five Prime’s colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) antibody program, led by the cancer/immunology compound FPA008.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →