Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Bitter Taste Receptor Engages Compounds Not Just Outside the Cell, but Inside

A bitter taste receptor, TAS2R14, has been shown to respond to both extracellular and intracellular signals. Indeed, it can respond to both signals simultaneously. This finding is especially interesting because bitter taste receptors are expressed not just ora

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

A bitter taste receptor, TAS2R14, has been shown to respond to both extracellular and intracellular signals. Indeed, it can respond to both signals simultaneously. This finding is especially interesting because bitter taste receptors are expressed not just orally, but extraorally. Also, these receptors respond not just to bitter-tasting substances, but to various kinds of drugs. Consequently, the dual-binding mechanism found for TAS2R14 opens up new possibilities for drug design.

The extracellular/intracellular capabilities of TAS2R14 were uncovered by scientists led by Masha Niv, PhD, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Moran Shalev-Benami, PhD, from the Weizmann Institute; and Dorothée Weikert, PhD, from Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. They presented their work in Nature Communications, in an article titled, “A bitter anti-inflammatory drug binds at two distinct sites of a human bitter taste GPCR.”

“Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the human TAS2R14 complexed with its signaling partner gustducin and bound to flufenamic acid (FFA), a clinically approved nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug,” the article’s authors wrote. “The structure reveals an unusual binding mode, where two copies of FFA are bound at distinct pockets: one at the canonical receptor site within the transmembrane bundle, and the other in the intracellular facet, bridging the receptor with gustducin.”

There are many chemically different molecules that trigger bitter taste sensations, and the body uses a family of 25 receptors to detect them. Unlike most other bitter taste receptors, TAS2R14 is highly “promiscuous,” meaning it can recognize and respond to a wide variety of bitter substances, from vitamins to certain drugs and even odorants. The receptor’s ability to respond to such a diverse array of compounds makes it a subject of great interest for researchers. Until now, however, how exactly TAS2R14 binds to these compounds and triggers a response in the body was not fully understood.

Essentially, the research has revealed a hidden “pocket” inside TAS2R14. This breakthrough could help not only understand how our tongue senses bitterness, but also investigate the physiological roles of bitter taste receptors that are expressed extraorally. Interestingly, bitter taste receptors are also activated by many drugs.

The scientists used cryo-EM techniques, which allow the three-dimensional architecture of proteins to be seen in great detail. In the current study, cryo-EM revealed the structure of TAS2R14 together with flufenamic acid—a bitter anti-inflammatory drug that activates TAS2R14.

The structure led to a surprising discovery: the drug binds simultaneously at two distinct positions of the receptor: one copy bound at an extracellular site and the other at the intracellular one. This dual-binding mechanism sheds new light on how the receptor interacts with diverse chemical compounds, including those that cause bitterness.

“To provide direct evidence for binding of the molecule at different pockets of the receptor, we have developed a new assay, which enables us to measure the binding specifically at the extracellular and the intracellular binding site, providing a unique tool for site-specific discovery,” Weikert added.

“TAS2R receptors do much more than just help us taste bitterness,” noted the study’s lead authors, Hebrew University’s Lior Peri and the Weizmann Institute’s Donna Matzov. “They are found in many parts of the body and are involved in processes like breathing, digestion, and the immune system. By discovering this new pocket, we’ve opened the door to new ways of designing medications that target these receptors, potentially helping to treat conditions like asthma, obesity, and inflammation.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →