Understand the source comparison
Thymalin Protocol Comparison: Loading vs Maintenance vs Continuous
| Protocol Type | Dosage | Frequency | Duration | Thymic Regeneration Markers (CD31+ RTE) | Maintenance of Effect Post-Cycle | Recommended Use Case | Professional Assessment ||—|—|—|—|—|—|—|| Loading Phase | 10mg/day | Daily (before bed) | 10–20 days | Signifi
No winner is assigned.
This page preserves a source comparison for education. It does not add a rating, recommendation or clinical judgment.
- | Protocol Type | Dosage | Frequency | Duration | Thymic Regeneration Markers (CD31+ RTE) | Maintenance of Effect Post-Cycle | Recommended Use Case | Professional Assessment ||—|—|—|—|—|—|—|| Loading Phase | 10mg/day | Daily (before bed) | 10–20 days | Significant increase (40–60% above baseline at week 8–12) | Requires maintenance dosing to sustain | Initial thymic restoration, post-illness immune recovery, age 50+ starting protocol | Most clinically validated approach. Aligns with Russian longevity trials and thymic proliferation kinetics || Maintenance Dosing | 5mg/injection | Twice weekly (e.g., Mon/Thu before bed) | 8–12 weeks | Moderate sustained elevation (20–35% above baseline) | Sustained if continued; gradual decline over 8–12 weeks if stopped | Follow-up to loading phase, long-term immune support, preventive anti-aging | Required to prevent receptor downregulation. Loading without maintenance loses 60% of gains within 3 months || Continuous Daily (Extended) | 5–10mg/day | Da