Understand the source comparison
Tesofensine Legal Status: International Comparison
United States Legal for institutional research with proper documentation Not DEA-scheduled; state analogue laws may apply in FL, GA, OH MSDS, CoA, customs declaration stating research use only Lowest legal risk when purchased through licensed institutional sup
No winner is assigned.
This page preserves a source comparison for education. It does not add a rating, recommendation or clinical judgment.
- United States
- Legal for institutional research with proper documentation
- Not DEA-scheduled; state analogue laws may apply in FL, GA, OH
- MSDS, CoA, customs declaration stating research use only
- Lowest legal risk when purchased through licensed institutional suppliers with full documentation
- European Union
- Legal under REACH regulation for research entities
- Supplier must hold REACH registration; human consumption prohibited
- REACH Safety Data Sheet, supplier REACH number, import declaration
- Compliant pathway exists but requires REACH-registered suppliers. Verify before cross-border orders
- United Kingdom
- Legal for research under Misuse of Drugs Act exemptions
- Requires Home Office research license for certain applications
- Research license number, institutional verification, customs Form C&E 1076
- Institutional buyers face minimal legal risk; individual researchers require Home Office approval
- Australia
- Legal under Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) research exemptions
- TGA approval required for human-adjacent research protocols
- TGA approval reference, institutional ethics committee approval, import permit
- Higher regulatory burden than U.S.. Institutional compliance staff should manage procurement
- Canada
- Legal for research under Controlled Drugs and Substances Act exemptions
- Health Canada research license required for certain protocols
- Research license number, institutional verification, customs B3 form
- Similar to Australia. Institutional oversight required for compliant procurement