Understand the source comparison
Peptides and Autoimmune Protocol AIP Synergy Timing — Comparison
Simultaneous Start (Peptides + AIP Week 1) 8–12 weeks (masked by dietary changes) Impossible. Two variables changing Unstable. Antigen removal affects markers Unreliable. Can't isolate peptide vs diet effect Failed protocol design. Violates single-variable tes
No winner is assigned.
This page preserves a source comparison for education. It does not add a rating, recommendation or clinical judgment.
- Simultaneous Start (Peptides + AIP Week 1)
- 8–12 weeks (masked by dietary changes)
- Impossible. Two variables changing
- Unstable. Antigen removal affects markers
- Unreliable. Can't isolate peptide vs diet effect
- Failed protocol design. Violates single-variable testing principle
- AIP First, Peptides at Week 12
- 12+ weeks after AIP (delayed)
- Poor. Residual AIP effects confound peptide response
- Moderately stable if AIP compliance maintained
- Moderate. Peptide effects isolated but AIP baseline already shifted
- Suboptimal. Reverses biological sequence (elimination before modulation)
- Peptides First (12 weeks), AIP at Week 13
- 12 weeks (clean baseline)
- High. Peptide effects isolated Weeks 1–12, AIP effects isolated Weeks 13+
- Stable. Peptide-only phase allows controlled baseline
- High. Reintroduction occurs on stable immune-modulated foundation
- Gold standard. Allows independent measurement of both interventions
- Peptides Only (No AIP)
- 12 weeks (clean measurement)
- Perfect for peptide assessment
- Stable
- N/A
- Valid for pure immune modulation research. Misses dietary trigger elimination
- AIP Only (No Peptides)
- Perfect for dietary assessment
- Stable (no pharmacological variable)
- High
- Valid for antigen identification. Does not address immune dysregulation