Understand the source comparison
Ipamorelin Real vs Fake: Supplier Comparison
Third-Party COA Provided for every batch with lab contact info, HPLC chromatogram, and MS confirmation COA provided but lacks chromatogram or lists unverifiable lab No COA, or fabricated document with generic batch numbers Lyophilisation Quality Uniform white
No winner is assigned.
This page preserves a source comparison for education. It does not add a rating, recommendation or clinical judgment.
- Third-Party COA
- Provided for every batch with lab contact info, HPLC chromatogram, and MS confirmation
- COA provided but lacks chromatogram or lists unverifiable lab
- No COA, or fabricated document with generic batch numbers
- Lyophilisation Quality
- Uniform white powder, reconstitutes in <60 seconds, crystal-clear solution
- Powder may be discoloured or clumped, slower dissolution, occasional cloudiness
- Compressed cake or yellow/grey powder, incomplete dissolution, visible particles
- Packaging Integrity
- Sterile crimped vials, tamper-evident seals, batch-specific labelling
- Generic labelling, inconsistent crimp quality, batch numbers may not match COA
- Reused vials, no tamper seals, placeholder batch codes
- Supplier Transparency
- Publishes synthesis location, provides direct lab contact, responds to COA verification requests
- Limited transparency, vague about sourcing, may provide COA only on request
- No verifiable business address, ignores COA verification requests, claims 'proprietary testing'
- Professional Assessment
- Meets research-grade standards for purity, traceability, and safety. Suitable for controlled laboratory use
- Marginal quality control. May contain active ipamorelin but with unknown impurity profile or degraded potency
- High contamination and substitution risk. Not suitable for any use