Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Why does anyone go to the BIO convention, anyway?

N ext week, thousands of biotech professionals will flock to San Francisco, bouncing in and out of cramped meeting spaces and joining celebrities from lists A through D for the industry’s annual celebration of itself. But the show, the BIO International Conven

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

N ext week, thousands of biotech professionals will flock to San Francisco, bouncing in and out of cramped meeting spaces and joining celebrities from lists A through D for the industry’s annual celebration of itself. But the show, the BIO International Convention , is almost never the site of multibillion-dollar deals or ground-shifting merger announcements — those happen at the every-winter JP Morgan Healthcare Conference. And unlike ASCO, ASH, and other acronymic scientific meetings, BIO isn’t the staging ground for make-or-break data readouts. So why do about 15,000 industry types from around the world make the trip every year? For one, the vibe. JP Morgan is great for rubbing elbows with the monied institutions that drive the industry, but their presence contributes to a buttoned-up atmosphere that can stifle off-the-cuff conversations, biotech entrepreneurs said. “The BIO meeting has a very different pace and flavor,” said Mary Thistle, chief business officer of Cambridge-based Dimension Therapeutics, who has been attending both shows for about a decade. “You can get access to pretty much anyone, and you have the luxury of having a little bit more time.” For Praveen Tipirneni, that laid-back experience is the main draw of BIO (which is hosted by the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group that’s also known, confusingly, as BIO). “The things that would only be talked about behind closed doors at JP Morgan can be talked about here in a more casual environment,” said Tipirneni, CEO of Morphic Rock Therapeutic. “You don’t have to feel like you’re always on the record.” At BIO, schedules tend to be looser — which for smaller companies that might struggle for face time with overbooked C-suiters at JP Morgan makes the annual June pilgrimage a better place to get a foot in the door for future collaboration. Tipirneni skipped the last few BIOs, finding little allure when he was an executive at the roughly 900-employee Cubist Pharmaceuticals. But now that he’s leading a startup, the conference offers him a shot at meeting would-be partners who might not have time for Morphic Rock at a more frenetic conference.

Praveen Tipirneni, CEO of Morphic Rock Therapeutic, makes a point of going to BIO. Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe

BIO sells itself on that potential, promising upstart biotechs a shot at making the connection that snowballs into a high-dollar deal, and offering up tiny cubes of meeting space to let them mingle with pharma. But BIO dedicates the majority of its real estate to people selling something else — services, software, or the promise of tax breaks — and each year scores of vendors are splayed across about 500,000 square feet that is rented out for around $40 a foot. The trade show floor is packed with row after row of smiling delegates from countries around the world, peddling tchotchkes of varying utility if you’ll only grant them your card. These people, many of whom represent state and national economic development organizations, are in the business of harvesting leads. If you, for example, trade your contact info for a stuffed koala from the Australia booth, you can expect to later hear about the many virtues of building a new drug manufacturing plant in Adelaide. “The BIO meeting has a very different pace and flavor.” Mary Thistle, Dimension Therapeutics Conference-goers trade tips on where to find the best schwag, and the most popular freebies — like cappuccino at the Italy booth — can draw droves. But if you go year after year, it all begins to blend together, past attendees said. Sue Washer, president and CEO of the gene therapy biotech AGTC, said she stopped bothering with the show floor once her kids outgrew their fascination with kitschy pieces of flair. Aside from its mercantile leanings, BIO also serves as a sort of barometer for the biotech business — from the relative quietude of 2009’s mid-downturn incarnation to a glitzier affair in 2014, where attendees partied on an aircraft carrier and watched the World Cup from an ersatz soccer pitch. The conference, which is held in a different city each year, reached a surreal peak last year in Philadelphia when Boyz II Men, moments removed from performing their 1994 hit “ I’ll Make Love to You ,” awkwardly introduced the head of the BIO trade group before a full house at Temple University’s basketball arena. It was June, and the Nasdaq biotech index was trading near its all-time high. Biotech’s summertime zenith would be short-lived, however, as mounting concerns about the ever-rising price of new treatments tamped down investors’ exuberance with the industry. By the winter, biotech stocks had fallen nearly 40 percent, driven down by the increasingly popular opinion that drugs are too expensive, one held by Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump alike. And the BIO trade group, as the de facto mouthpiece for the companies that develop those drugs, went on the offensive. First, the organization conducted its first-ever excommunication, ousting the Martin Shkreli-led Turing Pharmaceuticals from its roster to distance itself from that company’s dramatic price increase on an old drug. Then BIO launched a PR initiative , buying the somewhat clunky domain TimeIsPrecious.life to argue that it’s impossible to assign a price tag to the extra months or years of life provided by therapies that work. “Right now, our industry is facing a test,” BIO trade group CEO Jim Greenwood said in an email. “How we respond could determine the actions that politicians take. It’s time we simplify our case.” And that immediacy has trickled into the conference programming. This year, BIO’s splashy guest is Will Smith. But he’s not on hand to perform, say, “Summertime” or “Gettin’ Jiggy Wit It.” Instead, he’ll be hosting a keynote conversation with Dr. Bennet Omalu, the neuropathologist he played in the movie “Concussion.” BIO hasn’t completely lost its appetite for revelry, though. The conference’s anchor celebration is a so-called Summer of Love party , inviting attendees to “travel back to that special time where flower power patterns, vibrant funkadelic colors, and groundbreaking music captured the imagination of the country,” according to the program. After all, San Francisco is “the epicenter of the hippie movement and counterculture,” BIO notes. And what better place for a drug industry conference?

Kendall Squared brings you dispatches from the world’s epicenter for biotechnology and drug discovery.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →