Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Viral Vaccine Harnesses Protein-Degradation Machinery

Researchers have developed a promising new strategy for generating live-attenuated viral vaccines. Their strategy, which uses PROTAC technology to prompt host cells to degrade viral proteins, was shown to elicit strong immune responses in animal models. The fi

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Researchers have developed a promising new strategy for generating live-attenuated viral vaccines. Their strategy, which uses PROTAC technology to prompt host cells to degrade viral proteins, was shown to elicit strong immune responses in animal models. The findings are published in the journal Nature Biotechnology in a paper titled “ Generation of a live attenuated influenza A vaccine by proteolysis targeting .” Live-attenuated viral vaccines use a weakened form of the virus that causes the disease. But the utility of these vaccines has been limited by safety concerns, suboptimal immunogenicity, and inefficient manufacturing processes. These limitations have prompted some researchers, including Longlong Si, PhD, from the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (SIAT) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to explore alternative strategies for generating live-attenuated vaccines. Si’s team recognized that viral replication—and the spread of infection—depend on the stability of virally encoded proteins. They postulated that utilizing the protein-degradation machinery of the host cell to manipulate the stability of viral proteins after infection may represent a potential new strategy for developing live-attenuated viral vaccines. The team engineered influenza A viruses in such a way that after infecting host cells, the viral proteins were degraded—or live attenuated—by the host. In mouse and ferret models, the engineered viruses were shown to elicit robust and broad immune responses. The success of their strategy is based on proteolysis targeting chimeric (PROTAC) technology, an effective protein-degradation tool developed in recent years. It harnesses the normal ubiquitin-proteasome system of the cell to degrade unwanted proteins. Si’s team designed PROTAC viruses in which influenza viral proteins were fused to a conditionally removable proteasome-targeting domain (PTD). When these viruses infected conventional cells, they were live attenuated by the host protein degradation machinery. The researchers also generated stable cell lines that maintain the reproductive potential of the PROTAC viruses during vaccine production. These cell lines express an enzyme that removes the PTD from the viral proteins, thus sparing them from degradation. “This PROTAC vaccine technology could be a promising and universal strategy for creating safer and more effective vaccines,” wrote the researchers. “It is a simple and general method, potentially applicable to many other viruses, and accessible to most laboratories.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What about safety and efficacy?

Twenty years have passed since the first PROTAC was reported, and many companies have brought protein degraders to preclinical and clinical development. This leads to the crucial question of whether new generations of targeted protein degraders are safe and effective. Shen points out that no major safety-related issues have been observed with PROTAC drugs in clinical programs. He does not anticipate any major safety issues with ATAC degraders, even though clinical data on PROTAC safety is still limited, especially with respect to long-term outcomes. Shen’s optimism is shared by Tozzo. “By leveraging ASGPR,” Tozzo says, “we are engaging the natural machinery that the body is already using for protein degradation.” Another key question involves whether the efficacy of various protein degraders may diminish over time. In the case of PROTACs, Shen notes that there is no evidence from clinical trials that they are more prone to resistance development than standard inhibitors. However, preclinical studies suggest that defects in the E3-ubiquitination system could become a source of resistance to PROTACs. As Shen explains, “Time will tell whether any of the resistance mechanisms observed in preclinical studies may emerge in the clinical setting.” Despite the many unknowns, the companies we interviewed were optimistic about the prospect of clinical trials for their targeted protein degraders. Nasveschuk notes that C4 Therapeutics has three projects that are in Phase I trials, and multiple other drugs in the preclinical stage. Hansen also emphasizes the success of Nurix’s therapies that degrade a protein called Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK). She notes that the company’s lead BTK degrader, NX-2127, has already demonstrated proof of efficacy in ongoing Phase I trials: “Thus far, we have demonstrated rapid, robust, and sustained BTK degradation independent of BTK mutations.” Tozzo likewise suspects that ATAC inhibitors will perform well in clinical trials. She states, “Based on the robust degradation we have observed in our nonhuman primate studies with our proof-of-concept ATAC degraders, we anticipate good translation of ATAC degradation activity in the clinic.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →