Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Vertex’s new pain, blood disorder drugs miss Wall Street expectations

Sales from two of Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ newest products appear to have dampened an earnings report that otherwise met or slightly exceeded expectations on Wall Street. Vertex recorded a little over $3 billion from July through September, up 11% from the same

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Sales from two of Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ newest products appear to have dampened an earnings report that otherwise met or slightly exceeded expectations on Wall Street. Vertex recorded a little over $3 billion from July through September, up 11% from the same three-month period a year prior. More than 85% of that total came from Trikafta, a three-in-one medicine for cystic fibrosis. Trikafta did the “heavy lifting,” while the rest of Vertex’s earnings were “relatively underwhelming,” according to Evercore ISI analyst Cory Kasimov. In a note to clients, Casimov explained the launches of Vertex’s Journavx and Casgevy fell a bit short of analyst forecasts. Journavx, a non-opioid drug approved early this year for the “acute” pain typically felt after an accident or surgery, generated almost $20 million in the third quarter. That’s up 63% from the second quarter. Yet analysts had, on average, hoped to see closer to $23 million. Vertex highlighted throughout its earnings report the progress made with the Journavx launch. Between early March, when the drug became available at pharmacies, through mid-October, more than 300,000 prescriptions have been written and filled. By that later date, north of 170 million people in the U.S. had covered access to it. And about 90 of 150 large healthcare systems that Vertex has been targeting are offering Journavx in some way. These updates suggest “solid underlying demand momentum,” wrote Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Carter Gould. Broadly, though, “this remains a show-me story.” Journavx entered the market as a highly anticipated alternative to opioid-based therapies, with analysts pegging it as a product that would eventually earn more than $1 billion annually. But to reach that level, millions of prescriptions need to be written. Vertex will have to overcome significant challenges to get there, chiefly price and commercial fit. Journavx, initially set at $31 per day, is many times more expensive than some generic opioids. It’s also been shown to be about as pain-relieving as a weak opioid, stirring debate amongst doctors about where such a drug would be most useful. Sales of Casgevy, meanwhile, totaled $17 million, down more than 40% from the prior quarter. First approved in late 2023, Casgevy is a therapy used to treat sickle cell disease as well as another blood condition that can cause severe anemia, fatigue and misshapen bones. It's made by harvesting a patient’s own blood stem cells, genetically engineering them to produce a key protein, then infusing them back into the patient — who has already undergone chemotherapy to clear space for these new cells to grow. Casgevy's effects are close to curative, which has sparked a high level of interest among potential patients. However, its administration process is arduous, hard on the body and extremely technical, stretching from months up to a year. Around 165 prospective Casgevy patients had their first cell collections as of Sept. 30, including 50 people in the third quarter, according to Vertex. On a call with investors, Duncan McKechnie, Vertex’s newly minted chief operating officer, said the company has a “clear line of sight to over $100 million in Casgevy revenue this year.” Analysts maintained that the launches of both Journavx and Casgevy are heading in the right direction. Whether they’re doing so fast enough to appease investors is less apparent. Shares of Vertex dropped as much as 5% early Tuesday, though they had climbed back up to flat by mid-morning. “While access progress and patient enrollment dynamics for these respective therapies are promising, we do think investors may not be inclined to look past the clear revenue misses,” wrote Christopher Raymond, an analyst at the investment firm Raymond James, in a note to clients. Brian Abrahams, of RBC Capital Markets, argues that these launch challenges and Vertex’s increased spending put more pressure on two of the company’s experimental kidney drugs to succeed. Late-stage results for those drugs, which are known as povetacicept and inaxaplin, should arrive over the course of next year. The former of those two has drawn particular interest. Researchers are evaluating it as a treatment for “IgA nephopathy,” a chronic kidney condition that’s become an intensely competitive area of drug development. Abrahams and his team anticipate that povetacicept would, if it comes to market, bring in at least $1.2 billion in yearly sales at its peak. Corrected: A previous version of this story incorrectly attributed earnings commentary from Duncan McKechnie to Vertex’s former chief operating officer, Stuart Arbuckle.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →