Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Versatile Automated Sample Preparation for High-Throughput Peptide Analysis

Jason D. Russell Ph.D. LC/MS Scientist Agilent Technologies Throughput, scalability, and transferability—when it comes to method development for protein and peptide sample prep, these factors can challenge the success of even the most skilled practitioners. An

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Jason D. Russell Ph.D. LC/MS Scientist Agilent Technologies

Throughput, scalability, and transferability—when it comes to method development for protein and peptide sample prep, these factors can challenge the success of even the most skilled practitioners. An intuitive and reliable automation platform, working in concert with a suite of designed-for-purpose software tools, can be the key to breaking free of the limitations of entrenched manual methods.

Ideally, an automated method development platform should feature the functionality of typical wet-bench chemistry, with all the benefits of automation. Recent technological advances have brought new levels of reproducibility, reliability, and usability into scientists' hands, offering the potential to transform their ability to carry out quantitative proteomics with unprecedented analytical precision.

The Agilent AssayMAP Bravo platform and its suite of proteomic tools are engineered to bring reproducibility, scalability, protocol portability, and ease-of-use to LC/MS sample preparation. The platform comprises a best-in-class liquid handler, disposable microchromatography cartridges, and simple, user-customizable protocols to enable high-throughput protein digestion and peptide cleanup.

Ease-of-Use Is Key

Assay developers know that keeping up with constantly changing technology—new software packages, new instrumentation, new search algorithms—takes a great deal of time and energy. If an automation platform requires users to become robotics experts as well as proteomics experts, that means less time and effort are available for developing methods.

A good method development platform lets users focus their expertise where it is needed most—on finding a sample prep regime that works for them. Rapid access to essential protocols and system utilities is crucial for helping users transition between workflows, while ensuring optimum system performance is maintained.

Intuitive Customization

In traditional automation, procedures are developed and then ported over and locked down in the automation environment. This approach can significantly complicate development, validation, and eventual scale-up of methods to meet throughput demands.

In order to truly develop assays in the automation space, users need direct control over such steps as denaturation, alkylation, incubation, and protease addition for an in-solution protein digestion protocol without having to reprogram the automation function to accommodate adding, omitting, or adjusting individual steps. No matter what combination of steps is required, the platform should allow developers to easily and confidently automate their own validated chemistry.

Lose the Backlog, Not Performance

Processing thousands of samples per week is of little use if the tasks aren't carried out with sufficient precision to allow quantitative downstream analysis. Load capacity, sample recovery, and fractionation performance all impact LC/MS data quality. Automation can deliver the low intra-day and inter-day variability needed to ensure that your sample prep is as precise as all other analytics in your workflow.

Jason D. Russell, Ph.D., is LC/MS scientist at Agilent Technologies.

For more on MS, be sure to check out "SISCAPA and Automation for High-Throughput Protein Bioanalysis."

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How do these peptides act?

These peptides, like the parent compound AC253, acted as antagonists at the AMY receptor. They were also resistant to protein breakdown, and crossed the blood-brain barrier easily when injected into the abdominal cavity, to localize in the hippocampus, which is crucial in memory. These peptides protected the brain against beta-amyloid injury, and normalized the AD-associated impairment of the memory-associated long-term potentiation of nerve impulses in the hippocampus. They improved memory testing results, and reduced the level of inflammation in the brain. These effects appear to be mediated via the blockade of AMY receptors. For instance, inhibition of microglial AMY receptors reduce the activation of the inflammasome NLRP3. This reduces the secretion of inflammatory chemicals in the surrounding brain tissue, which offers another mechanism for lower amyloid production. In addition, these peptides increase the rate of outflow of amyloid beta from the brain, which also contributes to a lower level of amyloid after treatment. These marked changes all occurred within a relatively short span of treatment. A very important additional finding was that treatment with these peptides brought about improvement in mice which were showing signs of well-established AD in the brain as well as in their behavior. This is unique in that most therapies fail to affect the progress of AD once it has begun to manifest clinically. Peptides also have fewer off-target effects. Small molecules are easy to administer, inexpensive to make and cross the blood-brain barrier more rapidly. For this reason, the team resorted to computational tools and artificial intelligence to come up with a new small molecular drug based on these peptides. This can be taken orally, and is similar in size and structure to the medications used for medical conditions like high blood pressure. An optimized version is being developed to enable human trials to be conducted. The work so far has taken about two decades, building step upon painstaking step to come up with the right solution. However, says Jhamandas, “Occasionally you come across a discovery that has the potential to change the game in a very fundamental way, like hitting a home run, and I'm very excited that we are really on to something here.” Short amylin receptor antagonist peptides improve memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Rania Soudy, Ryoichi Kimura, Aarti Patel, Wen Fu, Kamaljit Kaur, David Westaway, Jing Yang & Jack Jhamandas. Scientific Reports, volume 9, Article number: 10942 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47255-9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47255-9

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
02What roles does the system play?

The endogenous opioids and their receptors are widely distributed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems, particularly the parts of these systems that regulate pain, emotion, reward, stress responses, motivation, drug addiction, and autonomic control. The differential expression and location of the various receptor subtypes across different neurons account for the wide range of opioid-related behaviors. The activation of µ-opioid receptors is mainly known for playing a role in pain relief. Still, research has also indicated it may be involved in behaviors related to survival, such as appetite and reproduction. The activity of µ-opioid receptors is also known to play a critical role in responses to social stimuli by modulating responses to social rejection or social acceptance, for example. Activation of the δ-opioid receptors and κ-opioid receptors is also known to be involved in pain modulation. Also, studies have shown that NOP activation is involved in pain mechanisms and several behaviors related to psychological stress. Alterations in the endogenous opioid system are suspected to be involved in Parkinson's disease, seizures, neuroprotective mechanisms, and depression.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
03A peptide identified in a fungus found in northern European pine forests possesses as much power as penicillin as well as vancomycin, according to an international team of researchers.

Reporting in the October 13 issue of Nature, a team from Denmark-based biotech company Novozymes, and researchers from Georgetown University Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, say they have isolated "plectasin," the first defensin ever found in fungi. The research was performed at Novozymes laboratories in Denmark. Defensins are peptides, miniature protein molecules that are produced by a wide range of animals to protect themselves against infection. Humans have defensins in their white blood cells and in their skin, for example, but it is believed that this new fungal defensin, plectasin, is more potent and targets certain bacteria more specifically. Indeed, when plectasin was tested in the laboratory and in animals, it proved to be highly effective against the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes, including strains that are now resistant to conventional antibiotics. These bacteria are responsible for such diseases as meningitis, community-acquired pneumonia, strep throat, life-threatening sepsis, and flesh destroying skin infections. The discovery of plectasin has implications for the development of defensins as a treatment against many common, and deadly, infections, and may initiate a new era of antibiotic discovery and development, said study co-author Michael Zasloff, M.D., Ph.D., Professor in the Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics at Georgetown University Medical Center. Zasloff says that the field of antibiotic development has not changed much since 1929 when Alexander Fleming realized that the fungal "bread mold" Penicillium, which had landed by chance in a Petri dish produced a substance that eliminated colonies of staphylococcal bacteria. "Most antibiotics used by humans are produced by fungi and certain soil bacteria," he said. "Using our existing tools of discovery, we have failed to uncover any new classes of antibiotics from these sources over the past decade. However, by utilizing a new genetic approach that allowed the team to discover plectasin, we now know that a whole class of antibiotics has been overlooked." "This finding (plectasin), and the existence of about 200,000 additional species of fungi, opens up a vast universe to explore for novel peptide antibiotics," said co-author Robert Lehrer, M.D., Distinguished Professor of Medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Plectasin, if proven safe and effective in humans, could be on the market by 2012, said Lehrer. Zasloff and Lehrer are known internationally as experts in antimicrobial peptides - the class of antibiotics that plectasin falls within - and in this study they collaborated with Novozymes, a Danish biotech company that led the research. Zasloff and Lehrer are the only two scientists from U.S. universities on the team of 20 researchers who co-authored the research paper. All life forms have to defend themselves against microbial invaders - bacteria, fungi, viruses - and to do this, they produce antimicrobial defensin peptides. In humans, defensins are made by specific white blood cells and immune cells that later engulf foreign invaders, and by the skin and mucous membranes, in order to kill microbes before they invade protective barriers. Researchers believe that fungi have a similar system of defense, especially since these plant-like organisms live off rotting matter, said Zasloff. "They must compete with other organisms, like bacteria and viruses, which also want to consume the same meal. In addition, they need to defend themselves from being eaten by the microbes which surround them." But he said no one had been able to find defensins in fungi using traditional research techniques, which involved growing fungi in liquid cultures and then testing the culture to see if it contained any antibiotic molecule. The research team instead used the latest genetic science to search for the defensins they thought fungi must have. Selecting the Pseudoplectania nigrella species of fungus may have been serendipitous, Lehrer said, but the Novozymes team used state-of-the-art biotechnology to intercept ,and interpret its genetic messages and exhibited tremendous skill in producing plectasin efficiently, economically, and in large amounts." "I started working on antimicrobial peptides over three decades ago, said Lehrer, and my laboratory first described human defensins in 1985. So, the discovery of plectasin makes me feel like a grandfather." Further examination revealed that this defensin, plectasin, resembles defensins found in spiders, scorpions, dragonflies and mussels - thus suggesting that the defensins found in insects, molluscs and fungi arose from a common ancestral gene, the researchers say. Based on this information, the scientists now believe that defensins appeared in living things more than a billion years ago. The investigators then turned to the National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control, the Danish equivalent of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, to test plectasin in the laboratory for antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria. It showed potent activity against several species of Gram-positive bacteria, and was especially active against S. pneumoniae (the leading cause of pneumonia), including all known clinical strains and those that are now resistant to conventional antibiotics. "That is important because increasing bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics threatens the future of many antibiotics in current use," Zasloff said. "In mouse studies, plectasin showed extremely low toxicity, and was as effective as vancomycin and penicillin in curing the animals of experimental peritonitis (inflammation of the lining of the abdominal cavity, which can be deadly) and pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae, the researchers report. "Although the precise mechanism by which plectasin exerts its antimicrobial activity is still under investigation, it may work by a mechanism that is very different from traditional antibiotics, Zasloff said. "As a group, defensins exhibit activity against many types of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and even viruses. It is entirely possible that fungal defensins will be discovered that could be developed against all of these human pathogens," Zasloff added.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
04How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
05So, how can this definition challenge be overcome?

To precisely define self and non-self peptides and, in turn, self-similarity, we must first improve our understanding of the adaptive immune cascade and its constituent components. In brief, the fundamental unit of adaptive immune recognition comprises the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules (called the human leukocyte antigen [HLA] in humans), the peptide being presented (and, in turn, identified as self or non-self), and the T cell receptor.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
comparison

Comparisons

Side-by-side pages for commonly compared peptides and research compounds.

Source: peptideuniv.com
Research context

Read sources and limitations before applying a claim.

Longevity, Performance & Obesity Research

A research peptide formulation developed to investigate metabolic regulation, mitochondrial function, and nutrient-sensing pathways.

Source: mypeptidematch.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →