Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Valium Soothes Best If Its Target Receptor Snuggles with Auxiliary Protein

Valium doesn’t calm nerves alone. It works with a partner, a transmembrane protein that sits beside the neurotransmitter receptor that valium targets. If the protein is absent, valium fails to boost the nerve-calming action of the receptor, the γ-aminobutyric

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Valium doesn’t calm nerves alone. It works with a partner, a transmembrane protein that sits beside the neurotransmitter receptor that valium targets. If the protein is absent, valium fails to boost the nerve-calming action of the receptor, the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor. This finding, which appeared October 10 in a paper published in Science, is significant because it could help researchers improve their understanding of sedatives. It could also help developers of neurological drugs recognize the importance of auxiliary proteins and their effects.

The Science paper, titled “Shisa7 is a GABAA receptor auxiliary subunit controlling benzodiazepine actions,” is the work of researchers based at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). It describes how the NINDS team determined that a protein called Shisa7 helps regulate GABAA receptor expression and function.

“We found that Shisa7 plays a critical role in the regulation of inhibitory neural circuits and the sedative effects some benzodiazepines have on circuit activity,” said Wei Lu, PhD, a Stadtman Investigator at the NINDS and the senior author of the study. “We hope the results will help researchers design more effective treatments for a variety of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders that are caused by problems with these circuits.”

Lu’s lab studies the genes and molecules used to control synapses—the relay points for the chemical and chemical signals that pass between neurons. In the current study, Lu and colleagues focused on the synapses that rely on GABAA receptors, ligand-gated anion channels that are of great physiological and clinical importance because they mediate fast inhibitory transmission in the mammalian brain. They are also, the scientists wrote, “thought to be determined by the channel pore–forming subunits.”

“Shisa7 controls receptor abundance at synapses and speeds up the channel deactivation kinetics,” detailed the authors of the Science paper. “Shisa7 also potently enhances the action of diazepam, a classic benzodiazepine, on GABAA receptors. Genetic deletion of Shisa7 selectively impairs GABAergic transmission and diminishes the effects of diazepam in mice.”

In 2004, Japanese researchers originally discovered that the Shisa gene played a role in the formation of frog heads and, named the gene after a mythological, large-headed, guardian figure depicted in statues throughout southern Japan. Initially, Shisa7 was thought to play a role in controlling a synapse that relies on the neurotransmitter glutamate to excite, rather than quiet, neurons.

Recent studies suggested that Shisa7 along with other Shisa genes encodes proteins that adhere to glutamate receptors. Once attached, these “auxiliary” proteins can control a receptor’s response to glutamate or its presence at synapses. Then, a few years ago, Lu’s team noticed something interesting in a scientific article on the Shisa proteins.

“We found the results striking,” said Lu. “The paper showed that Shisa7 was the only protein in this family that seemed to have no effect on the activity of an important type of glutamate receptor.”

To take a closer look, Lu and colleagues systematically examined Shisa proteins in mouse neurons. To their surprise, they found that Shisa7 appeared to play a unique and critical role in the nerve quieting GABA synapses.

The researchers used advanced microscopic techniques to spot Shisa7 tightly clustered with GABAA receptors at synapses. Genetically eliminating Shisa7 from neurons reduced the number of GABAA receptors and decreased the strength of electrical currents generated by synaptic GABAA receptor responses.

Further experiments suggested that Shisa7 proteins attached directly to GABAA receptors. Electrical recordings showed that Shisa7 hastened receptor responses to the transmitter GABA and nearly doubled the size of responses made in the presence of Valium (diazepam), suggesting the protein made the receptor more sensitive to benzodiazepines.

“These results suggest that Shisa7 directly shapes inhibitory synaptic responses under a variety of conditions, including the presence of benzodiazepines,” indicated Chris J. McBain, PhD, a co-author of the current study and a researcher at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Finally, experiments in mice supported the idea that Shisa7 also plays a role in the calming effects of benzodiazepines. For instance, in one set, the investigators tested the ability of diazepam to reduce the high anxiety mice felt when confronted with open, elevated spaces.

Here, the mice were placed in the middle of an elevated maze of two crisscrossing arms. One arm was covered and the other open. In agreement with previous studies, the researchers saw that injections of diazepam increased the time the wild-type mice chose to walk on open arms, suggesting the drug reduced anxiety. In contrast, diazepam had no effect on mice that were engineered to have no Shisa7 gene. These mice spent the same amount of time exploring the open arms regardless of whether they received the drug or a placebo.

In other experiments, the researchers found that Shisa7 also influenced the drowsiness and hypnotic effects of benzodiazepines. Mice that lacked Shisa7 were much less likely than wild-type mice to fall asleep from high levels of diazepam. Moreover, the mutant mice were dramatically better at standing up after diazepam-induced stumbles, in fact, some appeared resistant to stumbling.

“Our results shine a spotlight on the potential clinical importance of auxiliary proteins like Shisa7,” declared Lu. “Many of the neurological drugs we use today are designed to control the activity of synaptic receptors. For the first time, we show that researchers may also want to consider auxiliary proteins like Shisa7 in developing new treatments that target GABAA receptors.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →