Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

‘Unprecedented’ Revolution data point to paradigm shift in pancreatic cancer

An experimental drug from Revolution Medicines has proven broadly effective against an aggressive and tough-to-treat pancreatic tumor in a highly anticipated study result that could quickly change medical practice. Revolution disclosed in April that the drug,

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

An experimental drug from Revolution Medicines has proven broadly effective against an aggressive and tough-to-treat pancreatic tumor in a highly anticipated study result that could quickly change medical practice. Revolution disclosed in April that the drug, daraxonrasib, nearly doubled survival compared to standard chemotherapy in a Phase 3 trial. At the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting on Sunday, study investigators provided fuller details experts described as “unprecedented” and “landscape changing.” Revolution’s primary study objective was to test whether daraxonrasib could benefit pancreatic cancer patients whose disease had spread despite a previous treatment and whose tumors were driven by a particular “RAS G12” mutation. But it also evaluated daraxonrasib’s effects on the entire trial population as a secondary outcome, too. Data presented at ASCO show Revolution’s drug extended survival by a median of 13.2 months among all recipients. By comparison, those who got chemotherapy and had RAS G12 mutations lived a median of 6.6 months. And that figure was comparable — 6.7 months — for all treated with chemo. The benefits were similarly stark on measures of disease progression. For people with a RAS G12 mutation, daraxonrasib held tumors in check for a median of 7.3 months. For all drug recipients, that number was 7.2 months. Both numbers doubled the 3.5 month and 3.6 month median survival observed, respectively, among those groups of chemo recipients. “These results are landscape-changing for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a KRAS mutation,” said Rachna Shroff, hematology and oncology chief at the University of Arizona Cancer Center, in a statement provided by ASCO. “We are seeing unprecedented survival and efficacy in second-line treatment with an expected safety profile.” The data also mark the first time “any patients with pancreatic cancer” had lived a median of more than a year following a drug intervention in a clinical trial, said Alan Sandler, Revolution’s chief development officer. “A nd this is in the second-line setting,” in “the all-comer population,” he added. The drug’s impact was so broadly strong, in part, because enrollees who got daraxonrasib felt better almost immediately, added Pashtoon Kasi, a gastrointestinal oncology specialist at City of Hope and a study investigator. “We saw an improvement in patients' pain and tumor markers within a week or two of starting treatment. That's how quickly things worked,” Kasi said. Daraxonrasib is the latest step forward in what’s been a yearslong scientific push to develop medicines that can successfully target the “KRAS” mutations known to drive many cancers. That quest first yielded drugs now known as Lumakras and Krazati , which affect a specific type of KRAS mutation and haven’t become big sellers. Daraxonrasib works differently, binding to the protein in its active, or “on,” state and switching it off. The therapy’s progress treating pancreatic cancer — a notoriously deadly tumor and tough target for drugmakers — has vaulted Revolution into the biotechnology sector’s upper echelon. The company went public at $17 per share in 2020. Its stock price has climbed nearly ten-fold since, giving Revolution a comparable market capitalization to industry heavyweights like Biogen. Some analysts believe daraxonrasib could have a more than $10 billion overall market opportunity in pancreatic cancer alone. Revolution could begin generating sales faster than usual, as it’s already been awarded a “national priority” voucher that would speed up its U.S. review once an application is submitted.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →