Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Two biotechs raise a combined $556M in latest spurt of IPOs

Blood disease specialist Hemab Therapeutics and brain drug developer Seaport Therapeutics both priced initial public offerings on Thursday evening, hauling in a combined $556.4 million to fund the advancement of their respective drug therapies into late-stage

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Blood disease specialist Hemab Therapeutics and brain drug developer Seaport Therapeutics both priced initial public offerings on Thursday evening, hauling in a combined $556.4 million to fund the advancement of their respective drug therapies into late-stage clinical testing. Hemab raised $301.5 million in its offering, selling nearly 17 million shares at $18 apiece, more than what the biotechnology firm originally set out to sell. Hours before the IPO, Hemab disclosed in a securities filing that it had upped the size of its offering by 27%, a move that would have added $50 million in to its coffers. It ultimately secured even more than that. Seaport also surpassed its IPO projections in collecting $254.9 million. The company sold more than 14 million shares at $18 each and, in pricing its offering, became the first biotech focused on neurological disorders to go public in 2026. Hemab and Seaport will begin trading Friday under the respective ticker symbols “COAG” and “SPTX.” Like Avalyn Pharma , a lung disease drugmaker that debuted on Wednesday, Hemab and Seaport are adding to a notable stretch of larger-than-usual IPOs. So far in 2026, ten companies have banked almost $3.2 billion in total, a pace eclipsing what’s been seen in the last few years. Six of those biotechs secured at least $300 million — an uncommon occurrence since the market peaked during the pandemic — and two topped $400 million, according to BioPharma Dive data. Many of those going public this year also raised at least $300 million in venture funding and had medicines in mid-stage testing or later prior to their stock sales — a reflection of the prolonged downturn that forced many young drugmakers to stay private for longer. Even with the trio of IPOs this week, the sector is on track to complete around two dozen offerings in 2026, similar to what’s occurred in most years since 2022. Yet some investors suspect IPOs to become more broadly available amid a broader resurgence for biotech. “As the market continues to perform, we should see more companies pursuing the IPO route, including smaller offerings and potentially earlier-stage or higher-risk opportunities,” Antoine Papiernik, managing partner and chairman of venture capital firm Sofinnova Partners, told BioPharma Dive earlier this year . Hemab has two experimental medicines in testing for blood diseases. The most advanced is sutacimig, a bispecific antibody being studied in two different, rare clotting disorders called Glanzmann thrombasthenia and Factor VII syndrome. Hemab intends to advance sutacimig into a Phase 3 study in the former condition this year, and report data from a mid-stage trial in the latter disorder in late 2026 or early 2027. Second in its portfolio is HMB-002, which is one of a few preventive antibody therapies now being tested against Von Willebrand disease, another bleeding condition. The next readout from an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial should also come either late this year or early next. Prior to going public, Hemab secured venture backing from Sofinnova, RA Capital Management and Novo Holdings, among others. Seaport, a spinout of PureTech Health that has been positioned as a successor to Karuna Therapeutics , has two treatments in clinical testing for depression and generalized anxiety disorder. As Karuna did in schizophrenia, the company is essentially tweaking drugs that have shown promise in testing but have flaws such as liver toxicity or low absorption by the blood. Its first drug, SPT-300, has the same active ingredient as Zulresso, the postpartum depression medicine Sage Therapeutics brought to market. Seaport, though, hopes its version will display “rapid and durable efficacy” in major depressive disorder, where Zulresso struggled . Behind that drug is SPT-320, for which Seaport recently revealed Phase 1 data suggesting its treatment might sidestep liver-related issues that have plagued similar treatments. Seaport is also testing a third candidate it believes to have potential aganst multiple conditions including treatment-resistant depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. The company has multiple other pipeline programs underway as well, but didn’t provide specifics in its IPO filing.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →