Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

They’re Not Broken-Down Proteins, They’re Truncated Proteoforms

If you see a shorter version of a protein, don’t be too quick to dismiss it as a nonfunctional degradation product. It might be a shiny, new proteoform, an alternative version of a larger protein. The proteoform might even be more stable than the full-length p

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

If you see a shorter version of a protein, don’t be too quick to dismiss it as a nonfunctional degradation product. It might be a shiny, new proteoform, an alternative version of a larger protein. The proteoform might even be more stable than the full-length protein. Although proteoforms may arise naturally as cells respond to changing conditions, they may also occur accidentally when scientists try, and fail, to completely suppress the expression of a particular gene.

To distinguish between protein detritus and actual proteoforms, it helps to be aware of alternative translation start codons—as is a team of researchers at Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), a research institute located in Flanders, Belgium. These researchers, and others, have made use of mass spectrometry and ribosome profiling techniques to find alternative translation start codons in up to 20% of the human protein-coding genes.

In their most recent work, the VIB scientists, led by Professor Petra Van Damme, performed a proteome-wide study on protein turnover using positional proteomics and ribosome profiling to distinguish between N-terminal proteoforms of individual genes. They also assessed the relative stabilities of full-length proteins and their truncated proteoforms. To do so, they considered the effect on protein turnover of removing the initiator methionine by methionine aminopeptidases.

The results of this work were reported February 18 in the journal Molecular Systems Biology, in an article entitled, “Positional Proteomics Reveals Differences in N-Terminal Proteoform Stability.” Essentially, the work points to a role for alternative translation initiation and co-translational initiator methionine removal, next to alternative splicing, in the overall regulation of proteome homeostasis.

“By combining pulsed SILAC with N-terminal COFRADIC, we monitored the stability of 1,941 human N-terminal proteoforms, including 147 N-terminal proteoform pairs that originate from alternative translation initiation, alternative splicing or incomplete processing of the initiator methionine,” wrote the authors. “N-terminally truncated proteoforms were less abundant than canonical proteoforms and often displayed altered stabilities, likely attributed to individual protein characteristics, including intrinsic disorder, but independent of N-terminal amino acid identity or truncation length.”

The removal of the initiator methionine by methionine aminopeptidases, the authors added, generally reduces the stability of processed proteoforms. Also, the authors indicated that susceptibility for N-terminal acetylation did not seem to influence protein turnover rates.

Overall, the findings suggest that the diversity of human proteins may be fundamentally underestimated. The findings may also have important implications for gene editing. “To knock out a gene,” explained Daria Gawron, a study co-author and a Ph.D. student at VIB, “a point mutation in its DNA sequence can be very accurately introduced with modern gene-editing techniques. However, scientists should be aware that by doing so, they might actually induce the formation of a truncated, more stable version of the protein, provoking the exact opposite effect than desired.”

“In the past, researchers who observed shorter versions of certain proteins, quickly shelved them as nonfunctional byproducts of protein degradation,” concluded Professor Van Damme. “Our work shows that these protein variants are generally conserved. Not only are these proteoforms coded for in the genome, they are also tightly regulated and often display altered stability.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →