Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

The Solution to Obesity May Potentially Be in Your Gut

There is no simple solution to the obesity epidemic. There are several resources, programs, and guides that are geared to help people live a healthy lifestyle through healthy eating and regular physical activity. Now, new research shows that a stomach-specific

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

There is no simple solution to the obesity epidemic. There are several resources, programs, and guides that are geared to help people live a healthy lifestyle through healthy eating and regular physical activity. Now, new research shows that a stomach-specific protein plays a critical role in the progression of obesity, and could potentially lead to the development of therapeutics that would help individuals struggling with achieving and maintaining weight loss.

The study, “Gastrokine-1, an anti-amyloidogenic protein secreted by the stomach, regulates diet-induced obesity,” was published in the journal Scientific Reports and led by David Boone, PhD, associate professor of microbiology and immunology at Indiana University (IU) School of Medicine, and an adjunct professor in the department of biology at the University of Notre Dame.

“Obesity and its sequelae have a major impact on human health,” wrote the researchers. “The stomach contributes to obesity in ways that extend beyond its role in digestion, including through effects on the microbiome. Gastrokine-1 (GKN1) is an anti-amyloidogenic protein abundantly and specifically secreted into the stomach lumen. We examined whether GKN1 plays a role in the development of obesity and regulation of the gut microbiome.”

GKN1 is a stomach protein highly expressed in normal gastric tissue and plays a major role in maintaining gastric mucosal integrity. The researchers showed that curbing GKN1 produced significant differences in weight and levels of body fat in comparison to when the protein was expressed.

“While diet and exercise are critical to maintaining a healthy weight, some individuals struggle with weight loss—even in cases of bariatric surgery, maintaining weight loss can be a challenge,” explained Boone. “These results are an example of how a better understanding of the gut microbiome and the physiological aspects of obesity—how our bodies regulate metabolism and accumulate body fat—could help inform new therapies.”

The researchers conducted a microbiome analysis of mouse models with and without the GKN1 protein expressed. They observed models without GKN1 weighed less and had lower levels of total body fat and higher percentages of lean mass. When put on a high-fat diet (HFD), models without GKN1 showed resistance to weight gain, increased body fat, and hepatic inflammation.

“Gkn1−/− mice were resistant to diet-induced obesity and hepatic steatosis (HFD fat mass (g) = 10.4 ± 3.0 (WT) versus 2.9 ± 2.3 (Gkn1−/−) p < 0.005; HFD liver mass (g) = 1.3 ± 0.11 (WT) versus 1.1 ± 0.07 (Gkn1−/−) p < 0.05). Gkn1−/− mice also exhibited increased expression of the lipid-regulating hormone ANGPTL4 in the small bowel. The microbiome of Gkn1−/− mice exhibited reduced populations of microbes implicated in obesity, namely Firmicutes of the class Erysipelotrichia. Altered metabolism consistent with use of fat as an energy source was evident in Gkn1−/−mice during the sleep period,” wrote the researchers.

They did not find any evidence of adverse effects such as cancer, diabetes, loss of appetite, malabsorption, or inflammation. The loss of GKN1 expression is associated with gastric cancer. However, they did not find any evidence of gastric cancer in GKN1−/− mice. “Although we did not observe spontaneous gastric cancers in GKN1−/− mice we cannot rule out the possibility that loss of GKN1 predisposes to gastric cancer in the context of other additional inducers such as inflammation or infection.

Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of blocking GKN1 to prevent obesity, but this study is a step in potentially creating new therapeutics that could reduce the burden on health care systems and help improve quality of life for patients.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →