Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Study Proposes Increasing Soluble Beta-Amyloid to Treat Alzheimer’s Disease

Close at the heels of the FDA’s conditional approval the new drug for Alzheimer’s disease, aducanumab, that acts by reducing soluble and insoluble β amyloid, a new study led by scientists at the University of Cincinnati (UC) in collaboration with the Karolinsk

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Close at the heels of the FDA’s conditional approval the new drug for Alzheimer’s disease, aducanumab, that acts by reducing soluble and insoluble β amyloid, a new study led by scientists at the University of Cincinnati (UC) in collaboration with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, sheds new light on the pathological mechanism underlying Alzheimer’s disease and a highly debated drug therapy that argues in favor of increasing soluble amyloid levels.

The study published in the journal EClinicalMedicine “High cerebrospinal amyloid-β42 is associated with normal cognition in individuals with brain amyloidosis” and funded by UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute, claims that the treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease might lie in increasing the levels of the soluble, fibril-producing, 42-amino acid, β amyloid peptide (Aβ42), that aggregates into neurotoxic plaques, tau tangles and instigates neuroinflammation—the hallmarks of the disease. Based on their evidence, the authors argue that in its original, soluble form Aβ42 is needed to keep the brain healthy.

“It’s not the plaques that are causing impaired cognition,” says Alberto Espay, PhD, the new study’s senior author and professor of neurology at UC and a member of the UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute. “Amyloid plaques are a consequence, not a cause [of Alzheimer’s disease],” says Espay.

Since the first identification of plaques in the brains of patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease over a 100 years ago, Espay says scientists have focused on treatments to eliminate the plaques. But the UC team, he says, sees it differently. The hypothesis that Espay and his colleagues test in the paper is that the cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease is due to a decrease in soluble β amyloid peptide and not due to the corresponding increase of insoluble β amyloid plaques.

To test their hypothesis, the team analyzed the brain scans and cerebrospinal fluid from 598 participants in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study, who had amyloid plaques in their brains.

They compared the amounts of insoluble amyloid plaques and levels of soluble amyloid peptide in individuals with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease and found individuals with normal cognition had higher soluble amyloid levels (864.00 pg/ml) than individuals with mild cognitive impairment (768.60 pg/ml) or Alzheimer’s disease (617.46 pg/ml), despite the presence of brain amyloid plaques.

The researchers also found that higher levels of soluble amyloid β peptide were associated with a larger hippocampus, the area of the brain most important for memory.

Although by the age of 85, 60% of people will have these plaques, only 10% will develop dementia, the authors say.

“The key discovery from our analysis is that Alzheimer’s disease symptoms seem dependent on the depletion of the normal protein, which is in a soluble state, instead of when it aggregates into plaques,” says co-author Kariem Ezzat, PhD, scientist at the Karolinska Institute.

This leads the authors to conclude that the most relevant future therapeutic approach for Alzheimer’s disease will be replenishing soluble amyloid β peptide in the brain to their normal levels, says Espay. “Treatment,” says Espay, “may consist of increasing the soluble version of the protein in a manner that keeps the brain healthy while preventing the protein from hardening into plaques.”

The next step for the team is to test the findings and the novel treatment strategy in animal models. If successful, future treatments may overturn current approaches.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →