Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Stroke Recovery May Improve If Brain Repair Protein Is Protected

In a stroke’s aftermath, lipids are released that bind to and inactivate a unique brain-specific protein, an enzyme that clears away abnormal proteins and protects neurons from hypoxic injury. If this enzyme is tweaked in just the right way, it may retain its

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

In a stroke’s aftermath, lipids are released that bind to and inactivate a unique brain-specific protein, an enzyme that clears away abnormal proteins and protects neurons from hypoxic injury. If this enzyme is tweaked in just the right way, it may retain its activity—and aid functional recovery after stroke.

This idea, which occurred to researchers at the University of Pittsburgh, was recently tested in mice that were engineered to express a gene that encoded an altered version of the enzyme. Ordinarily, this enzyme, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1), includes a cysteine residue that is susceptible to binding by lipids called cyclopentenone prostaglandins (CyPgs). These lipids are released in nerve cells after a stroke, and after they bind to UCHL1, they cause the enzyme to unfold and lose its function.

The altered version of the enzyme, however, incorporates a binding site at the cysteine residue that is mutated, preventing lipid binding. According to the University of Pittsburgh researchers, the effects of the altered enzyme in mice suggest that UCHL1-focused strategies could be useful in treating stroke.

Detailed findings appeared this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in an article titled, “Role of UCHL1 in axonal injury and functional recovery after cerebral ischemia.” The article describes what the scientists observed after they surgically modeled the effects of stroke in both knockin (genetically engineered) and normal mice.

“Neurons derived from knockin mice had less cell death and neurite injury after hypoxia,” the article’s authors wrote. “There was also significantly improved sensorimotor recovery in postischemic knockin mice.”

These findings suggest that restoration of UCHL1 activity or prevention of degradation of UCHL1 activity by preventing binding of substrates to cysteine residue 152 could be useful approaches for the treatment of stroke. For example, the current study showed that keeping UCHL1 active after a stroke helped preserve the function of neurons and brain tissue by activating cellular repair mechanisms that quickly cleaned up damaged proteins, preventing further nerve cell loss. The mice with the resistant form of UCHL1 also had improved recovery of walking, balance, and other motor functions.

“While most stroke therapies focus on preventing neuronal death, preserving axonal integrity and decreasing white matter injury could be equally important for improved recovery,” said co-senior author Steven Graham, MD, PhD, professor of neurology at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine, and associate chief of staff for research at VA Pittsburgh. “UCHL1 is a central player in that process.”

“Even though traditional stroke therapies are very effective when available, the treatment must be started in the first hours after a stroke and most patients are not able to get these treatments. So there is a clear need for new approaches that can improve recovery days after a patient experiences a stroke,” explained Graham. “We think we have identified a protein that is at the root of how the brain recovers from stroke, making it an attractive target for developing drugs that help improve recovery.”

Graham and his colleagues, including co-senior author, Feng Zhang, PhD, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine, are now engaged in efforts to identify new drugs that could prevent CyPgs from binding to UCHL1 or to replace damaged UCHL1 proteins with a derivative that can be given intravenously.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →