Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Serif, Flagship’s latest biotech, aims to make a new kind of genetic medicine

Flagship Pioneering has launched a new biotechnology firm that believes it’s found a way to solve the problems that have long held back genetic medicine. Called Serif Biomedicines, the startup officially debuted on Tuesday armed with $50 million in funding and

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Flagship Pioneering has launched a new biotechnology firm that believes it’s found a way to solve the problems that have long held back genetic medicine. Called Serif Biomedicines, the startup officially debuted on Tuesday armed with $50 million in funding and the ability to make what it refers to as “modified DNA” medicines. According to CEO and co-founder Jacob Rubens, Serif’s drugs are designed to combine the strengths of multiple types of genetic medicines, from gene therapy to the messenger RNA and small-interfering RNA approaches popularized by companies like Moderna and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. Its treatments consist of two components: finely tuned instructions for a therapeutic protein as well as an mRNA sequence for “co-factors” that can help the treatment get into a cell’s nucleus. They’re sent to cells with the help of fatty shells called lipid nanoparticles, which are commonly used to deliver complex medicines. Serif claims this approach can sidestep many of the issues that limit the reach of genetic medicine. The tweaks Serif makes to DNA are meant to enable its therapies to durably and safely express genes without altering a cell’s genome — something that can risk causing unintended health problems. The accompanying co-factors are supposed to enhance their effects. And using specially designed lipid nanoparticles, rather than the engineered viruses many companies rely on for delivery, is a bid to enable its treatments to be dosed more than once and reach an array of tissue types. Those properties, Serif said, should make for treatments that are less complicated and cheaper to produce. The approach could also be potentially helpful against many conditions, including “broad medical applications” with “significant market opportunities,” it said in a statement. “Instead of making proteins outside of the body and injecting those proteins into us, we can actually make any drug inside of us by just delivering the DNA sequence that codes for that drug,” Rubens said. Serif will unveil preclinical data at an upcoming medical meeting. The company has not disclosed which conditions it’s targeting first, but is focused on rare genetic diseases and immunology, he said. Cell and gene therapy developers have had a harder time raising money in recent years amid lingering questions about development costs and market uptake. Still, newer approaches are gaining traction , and the field’s struggles haven’t deterred Flagship — a prominent biotech investor known for backing broad drugmaking platforms — from placing bets, Rubens said. “When a foundational layer of biology becomes engineerable, new therapeutic categories are born that can redefine the possibilities for medicine,” Noubar Afeyan, Flagship’s CEO and a co-founder of Serif, said in a statement. Serif is the first company publicly launched this year by Flagship. In 2025, the Cambridge, Massachusetts firm unveiled AI drug discovery startups such as Lila Sciences and Expedition Medicines , and saw several of its portfolio companies partner with bigger firms like Pfizer and GSK.. In naming the fledgling company, Flagship’s team looked to the ways typeface creators personalize their fonts. The miniscule strokes at the edges of a letter or number affect the way a reader perceives a word, Rubens said, much like how modifications to synthetic DNA can change how a cell might respond to a medicine. “Just like when you get a new app on your phone, you add a new capability, new software. That’s what we do when we deliver DNA to the cell,” Rubens said.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →