Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Removing Anthrax Bacterial Armor May Lead to New Therapies

Researchers at the VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology report that removing the armor of the bacterium that causes anthrax slows its growth and negatively affects its ability to cause disease. The study (“Structure of S-layer protein Sap reveals a mechanism

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Researchers at the VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology report that removing the armor of the bacterium that causes anthrax slows its growth and negatively affects its ability to cause disease. The study (“Structure of S-layer protein Sap reveals a mechanism for therapeutic intervention in anthrax”), which will appear in Nature Microbiology, may lead to new, effective ways of fighting anthrax and various other diseases, according to the scientists.

Anthrax is a deadly and highly resilient disease, caused by the spore-forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis. The toughness of the spores and the lethality of an anthrax infection via inhalation spurred its development as a biological weapon in the mid-twentieth century. Although the development and stockpiling of anthrax as a bioweapon has been banned by the international community, these regulations are violated at times. Because treatment options are limited and not effective in most cases, this means anthrax remains a potential bioterrorism threat.

As part of its strategy to evade the weapons of the immune system, the anthrax bacterium cloaks itself with a complex, dynamic armor. A poorly understood component of this armor is the Sap S-layer, a single layer of protein that forms a shell around the bacterium.

In this study, researchers successfully applied Nanobodies® (small antibody fragments) to control the assembly of the bacterial armor and study its structure. The Nanobodies were not only effective in preventing the armor from forming, but also proved highly efficient in breaking down existing S-layers. When applied to live bacteria, breaking down the armor slowed bacterial growth and led to drastic changes in the surface of the bacterial cell.

“At present, anthrax mostly affects wildlife and livestock, although it remains a concern for human public health, primarily for people who handle contaminated animal products and as a bioterrorism threat due to the high resilience of spores, a high fatality rate of cases and the lack of a civilian vaccination program. The cell surface of B. anthracis is covered by a protective paracrystalline monolayer, known as surface layer or S-layer, that is composed of the S-layer proteins Sap or EA1. Here, we generate Nanobodies to inhibit the self-assembly of Sap, determine the structure of the Sap S-layer assembly domain (SapAD) and show that the disintegration of the S-layer attenuates the growth of B. anthracis and the pathology of anthrax in vivo,” write the investigators.

“SapAD comprises six β-sandwich domains that fold and support the formation of S-layers independently of calcium. Sap-inhibitory nanobodies prevented the assembly of Sap and depolymerized existing Sap S-layers in vitro. In vivo, nanobody-mediated disruption of the Sap S-layer resulted in severe morphological defects and attenuated bacterial growth. Subcutaneous delivery of Sap inhibitory Nanobodies cleared B. anthracis infection and prevented lethality in a mouse model of anthrax disease. These findings highlight disruption of S-layer integrity as a mechanism that has therapeutic potential in S-layer-carrying pathogens.”

Antonella Fioravanti, PhD, who led the research, said that “I created these Nanobodies as a tool to study the Sap S-layer, but that they would also inhibit bacterial growth was an unexpected bonus.”

The effects were so striking, she added, that the Nanobodies were tested as a treatment in mice infected with B. anthracis. “The results were amazing, all treated mice recovered from lethal anthrax within days,” said Filip Van Hauwermeiren, PhD, who performed the infection studies. “We had been studying ways to stop the lethality of anthrax but had never seen such striking effects as with these Nanobodies,” added his supervisor Mohamed Lamkanfi, PhD, (previously at the VIB-UGhent Center for Inflammation Research, now at Janssen Pharmaceutica and Ghent University).

Therapeutics derived from the Nanobodies discovered in this study may one day fill the currently existing treatment gap, say the scientists. Moreover, targeting the S-layer with nanobodies may be successful in the fight against other bacteria with an S-layer armor. For example, the lab is currently exploring S-layer targeting Nanobodies in Clostridium difficile which causes life-threatening colitis.

The success of the experiments in this study have motivated the researchers to look for other vulnerable targets on bacterial cell surfaces.

“Proteins on the surface of bacteria are interesting antibacterial targets because they are directly accessible. Targeting these proteins means that we have to worry less about that various ways that bacteria are preventing drugs from getting into the cell,” pointed out Han Remaut, PhD, from VIB-VUB.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →