Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Peptides as multifunctional players in cancer therapy

Ladner, R. C., Sato, A. K., Gorzelany, J. & de Souza, M. Phage display-derived peptides as therapeutic alternatives to antibodies. Drug Disco. 9 , 525–529 (2004). CAS Google Scholar Fosgerau, K. & Hoffmann, T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future di

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

  1. Ladner, R. C., Sato, A. K., Gorzelany, J. & de Souza, M. Phage display-derived peptides as therapeutic alternatives to antibodies. Drug Disco. 9, 525–529 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fosgerau, K. & Hoffmann, T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Disco. 20, 122–128 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco‐Míguez, A. et al. From amino acid sequence to bioactivity: the biomedical potential of antitumor peptides. Protein Sci. 25, 1084–1095 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L. et al. Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 48 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kessel, C. et al. Multimerization of peptide mimotopes for blocking of factor VIII neutralizing antibodies. Chem. Med. Chem. 4, 1364–1370 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knittelfelder, R., Riemer, A. B. & Jensen-Jarolim, E. Mimotope vaccination–from allergy to cancer. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 9, 493–506 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tong, A. H. Y. et al. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321–324 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, M., Fang, X., Yang, Y. & Wang, C. Peptide-enabled targeted delivery systems for therapeutic applications. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 701504 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y. et al. Sortase A-mediated cyclization of novel polycyclic RGD peptides for ανβ3 integrin targeting. Bioorg. Med Chem. Lett. 73, 128888 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Echigo, H. et al. Development and evaluation of a theranostic probe with RGD peptide introduced platinum complex to enable tumor-specific accumulation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 70, 116919 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kato, N. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel adapter lipid derivative for preparation of cyclic peptide-modified PEGylated liposomes: Application of cyclic RGD peptide. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 176, 106239 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, K. & Chen, X. Integrin targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics. Theranostics 1, 189 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugahara, K. N. et al. Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer cell 16, 510–520 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruoslahti, E. Tumor penetrating peptides for improved drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 110, 3–12 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Teesalu, T., Sugahara, K. N., Kotamraju, V. R. & Ruoslahti, E. C-end rule peptides mediate neuropilin-1-dependent cell, vascular, and tissue penetration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16157–16162 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, T. et al. nRGD modified lycobetaine and octreotide combination delivery system to overcome multiple barriers and enhance anti-glioma efficacy. Colloids Surf. B 156, 330–339 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Su, S., Wang, H., Liu, X., Wu, Y. & Nie, G. iRGD-coupled responsive fluorescent nanogel for targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials 34, 3523–3533 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, K.-F. et al. The antitumor activity of a doxorubicin loaded, iRGD-modified sterically-stabilized liposome on B16-F10 melanoma cells: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J. Nanomed. 8, 2473 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fogal, V., Zhang, L., Krajewski, S. & Ruoslahti, E. Mitochondrial/cell-surface protein p32/gC1qR as a molecular target in tumor cells and tumor stroma. Cancer Res. 68, 7210–7218 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Karmali, P. P. et al. Targeting of albumin-embedded paclitaxel nanoparticles to tumors. Nanomedicine 5, 73–82 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hardwick, J. S. et al. Identification of biomarkers for tumor endothelial cell proliferation through gene expression profiling. Mol. Cancer Ther. 4, 413–425 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, D.-H., Lu, Q., Xie, J., Fang, C. & Chen, H.-Z. Peptide-conjugated biodegradable nanoparticles as a carrier to target paclitaxel to tumor neovasculature. Biomaterials 31, 2278–2292 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Obiri, N., Siegel, J., Varricchio, F. & Puri, R. Expression of high-affinity IL-4 receptors on human melanoma, ovarian and breast carcinoma cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 95, 148–155 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawakami, K., Leland, P. & Puri, R. K. Structure, function, and targeting of interleukin 4 receptors on human head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res. 60, 2981–2987 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawakami, M. et al. Interleukin 4 receptor on human lung cancer: a molecular target for cytotoxin therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 8, 3503–3511 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, J.-H. et al. Facilitated intracellular delivery of peptide-guided nanoparticles in tumor tissues. J. Control Release 157, 493–499 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chi, L. et al. Enhanced delivery of liposomes to lung tumor through targeting interleukin-4 receptor on both tumor cells and tumor endothelial cells. J. Control Release 209, 327–336 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeon, J. O. et al. Designed nanocage displaying ligand-specific peptide bunches for high affinity and biological activity. ACS Nano 7, 7462–7471 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guruprasath, P. et al. Interleukin-4 receptor-targeted delivery of Bcl-xL siRNA sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy and inhibits tumor growth. Biomaterials 142, 101–111 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Namgung, R. et al. Poly-cyclodextrin and poly-paclitaxel nano-assembly for anticancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–12 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. de Groot, A. E. et al. Targeting interleukin 4 receptor alpha on tumor-associated macrophages reduces the pro-tumor macrophage phenotype. Neoplasia 32, 100830 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bankaitis, K. V. & Fingleton, B. Targeting IL4/IL4R for the treatment of epithelial cancer metastasis. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 32, 847–856 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Figueiredo, P. et al. Peptide-guided resiquimod-loaded lignin nanoparticles convert tumor-associated macrophages from M2 to M1 phenotype for enhanced chemotherapy. Acta Biomater. 133, 231–243 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnsen, K. B. et al. A comprehensive overview of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles—endogenous nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1846, 75–87 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Alvarez-Erviti, L. et al. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian, Y. et al. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 35, 2383–2390 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohno, S.-i et al. Systemically injected exosomes targeted to EGFR deliver antitumor microRNA to breast cancer cells. Mol. Ther. 21, 185–191 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morishita, M., Takahashi, Y., Nishikawa, M., Ariizumi, R. & Takakura, Y. Enhanced class I tumor antigen presentation via cytosolic delivery of exosomal cargos by tumor-cell-derived exosomes displaying a pH-sensitive fusogenic peptide. Mol. Pharm. 14, 4079–4086 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunassekaran, G. R., Vadevoo, S. M. P., Baek, M.-C. & Lee, B. M1 macrophage exosomes engineered to foster M1 polarization and target the IL-4 receptor inhibit tumor growth by reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages into M1-like macrophages. Biomaterials 278, 121137 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhan, Q. et al. Engineering blood exosomes for tumor-targeting efficient gene/chemo combination therapy. Theranostics 10, 7889 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cheng, H. et al. Chimeric peptide engineered exosomes for dual-stage light guided plasma membrane and nucleus targeted photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 211, 14–24 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lim, W. A. & June, C. H. The principles of engineering immune cells to treat cancer. Cell 168, 724–740 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Maus, M. V. & June, C. H. Making better chimeric antigen receptors for adoptive T-cell therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 1875–1884 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gunassekaran, G. R. et al. Non-genetic engineering of cytotoxic T cells to target IL-4 receptor enhances tumor homing and therapeutic efficacy against melanoma. Biomaterials 159, 161–173 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cheng, H. et al. Stem cell membrane engineering for cell rolling using peptide conjugation and tuning of cell–selectin interaction kinetics. Biomaterials 33, 5004–5012 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sarkar, D. et al. Engineered cell homing. Blood 118, e184–e191 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnstone, S. A., Gelmon, K., Mayer, L. D., Hancock, R. E. & Bally, M. B. In vitro characterization of the anticancer activity of membrane-active cationic peptides. I. Peptide-mediated cytotoxicity and peptide-enhanced cytotoxic activity of doxorubicin against wild-type and p-glycoprotein over-expressing tumor cell lines. Anticancer Drug Des. 15, 151–160 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Luan, X. et al. Cytotoxic and antitumor peptides as novel chemotherapeutics. Nat. Prod. Rep. 38, 7–17 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mai, J. C., Mi, Z., Kim, S.-H., Ng, B. & Robbins, P. D. A proapoptotic peptide for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Res. 61, 7709–7712 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dufort, S. et al. Targeted delivery of a proapoptotic peptide to tumors in vivo. J. Drug Target 19, 582–588 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jin, Y. et al. Nanosystem composed with MSNs, gadolinium, liposome and cytotoxic peptides for tumor theranostics. Colloids Surf. B 151, 240–248 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ellerby, H. M. et al. Anti-cancer activity of targeted pro-apoptotic peptides. Nat. Med 5, 1032–1038 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Permpoon, U. et al. Inhibition of tumor growth against chemoresistant cholangiocarcinoma by a proapoptotic peptide targeting interleukin-4 receptor. Mol. Pharm. 17, 4077–4088 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vadevoo, S. M. P. et al. IL4 receptor–targeted proapoptotic peptide blocks tumor growth and metastasis by enhancing antitumor immunity anticancer activity of IL4R-targeted proapoptotic peptide. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 2803–2816 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Khan, F. et al. Identification of novel CD44v6-binding peptides that block CD44v6 and deliver a pro-apoptotic peptide to tumors to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in mice. Theranostics 11, 1326 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Fantin, V. R. et al. A bifunctional targeted peptide that blocks HER-2 tyrosine kinase and disables mitochondrial function in HER-2-positive carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 65, 6891–6900 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Arap, W. et al. Targeting the prostate for destruction through a vascular address. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1527–1531 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Jung, H.-K. et al. Bladder tumor-targeted delivery of pro-apoptotic peptide for cancer therapy. J. Control Release 235, 259–267 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vadevoo, S. M. P. et al. Peptide-based targeted therapeutics and apoptosis imaging probes for cancer therapy. Arch. Pharm. Res. 42, 150–158 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yamasaki, K. & Gallo, R. L. Antimicrobial peptides in human skin disease. Eur. J. Dermatol 18, 11–21 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Leuschner, C. & Hansel, W. Membrane disrupting lytic peptides for cancer treatments. Curr. Pharm. Des. 10, 2299–2310 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang, N., Lejon, T. & Rekdal, Ø. Antitumour activity and specificity as a function of substitutions in the lipophilic sector of helical lactoferrin‐derived peptide. J. Pept. Sci. 9, 300–311 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Han, J.-H. et al. Noxa mitochondrial targeting domain induces necrosis via VDAC2 and mitochondrial catastrophe. Cell Death Dis. 10, 1–13 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Warren, P. et al. In vitro targeted killing of prostate tumor cells by a synthetic amoebapore helix 3 peptide modified with two γ-linked glutamate residues at the COOH terminus. Cancer Res. 61, 6783–6787 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ersahin, D., Doddamane, I. & Cheng, D. Targeted radionuclide therapy. Cancers 3, 3838–3855 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Costa, F. & Gumz, B. Octreotide–a review of its use in treating neuroendocrine tumours. Eur. Endocrinol. 10, 70 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Bodei, L., Pepe, G. & Paganelli, G. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin analogues. Eur. Rev. Med Pharm. Sci. 14, 347–351 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Esser, J.-P. et al. Comparison of [177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3] octreotate and [177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3] octreotide: which peptide is preferable for PRRT? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 33, 1346–1351 (2006).

  69. Van de Wiele, C. et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry of 99mTc-RP527, a gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) agonist for the visualization of GRP receptor-expressing malignancies. J. Nucl. Med. 42, 1722–1727 (2001).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Laverman, P. et al. Targeting of a CCK2 receptor splice variant with 111In-labelled cholecystokinin-8 (CCK8) and 111In-labelled minigastrin. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 35, 386–392 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. La Manna, S., Di Natale, C., Florio, D. & Marasco, D. Peptides as therapeutic agents for inflammatory-related diseases. Int J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2714 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. do Pazo, C., Nawaz, K. & Webster, R. M. The oncology market for antibody-drug conjugates. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 583–584 (2021).

  73. Hoppenz, P., Els-Heindl, S. & Beck-Sickinger, A. G. Peptide-drug conjugates and their targets in advanced cancer therapies. Front Chem. 8, 571 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chavda, V. P., Solanki, H. K., Davidson, M., Apostolopoulos, V. & Bojarska, J. Peptide-drug conjugates: a new hope for cancer management. Molecules 27, 7232 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Raza Naqvi, S. A. et al. Insertion of a lysosomal enzyme cleavage site into the sequence of a radiolabeled neuropeptide influences cell trafficking in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 25, 89–95 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. van Duijnhoven, S. M., Robillard, M. S., Nicolay, K. & Grüll, H. Tumor targeting of MMP-2/9 activatable cell-penetrating imaging probes is caused by tumor-independent activation. J. Nucl. Med. 52, 279–286 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Szabó, I. et al. Development of an oxime bond containing daunorubicin-gonadotropin-releasing hormone-III conjugate as a potential anticancer drug. Bioconjug Chem. 20, 656–665 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lelle, M. et al. Octreotide-mediated tumor-targeted drug delivery via a cleavable doxorubicin–peptide conjugate. Mol. Pharm. 12, 4290–4300 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hou, J. et al. RGD peptide conjugation results in enhanced antitumor activity of PD0325901 against glioblastoma by both tumor-targeting delivery and combination therapy. Int J. Pharm. 505, 329–340 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Gilad, Y. et al. Dual‐drug RGD conjugates provide enhanced cytotoxicity to melanoma and non‐small lung cancer cells. Pept. Sci. 106, 160–171 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Fan, M. et al. Design and biological activity of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted peptide doxorubicin conjugate. Biomed. Pharmacother. 70, 268–273 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Regina, A. et al. Antitumour activity of ANG1005, a conjugate between paclitaxel and the new brain delivery vector Angiopep‐2. Br. J. Pharm. 155, 185–197 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M. & Pardoll, D. M. Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Science 367, eaax0182 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Valk, E., Rudd, C. E. & Schneider, H. CTLA-4 trafficking and surface expression. Trends Immunol. 29, 272–279 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Krummel, M. F. & Allison, J. P. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J. Exp. Med. 182, 459–465 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bagchi, S., Yuan, R. & Engleman, E. G. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu Rev. Pathol. 16, 223–249 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zou, W., Wolchok, J. D. & Chen, L. PD-L1 (B7-H1) and PD-1 pathway blockade for cancer therapy: Mechanisms, response biomarkers, and combinations. Sci. Transl. Med 8, 328rv324–328rv324 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Yi, M., Niu, M., Xu, L., Luo, S. & Wu, K. Regulation of PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 14, 1–13 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Dong, P., Xiong, Y., Yue, J., Hanley, S. J. & Watari, H. Tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling in cancer initiation, development and treatment: beyond immune evasion. Front Oncol. 8, 386 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Nguyen, L. T. & Ohashi, P. S. Clinical blockade of PD1 and LAG3—potential mechanisms of action. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 45–56 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M., Anders, R. A. & Pardoll, D. M. Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 275–287 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Tremblay-LeMay, R., Rastgoo, N. & Chang, H. Modulating PD-L1 expression in multiple myeloma: an alternative strategy to target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. J. Hematol. Oncol. 11, 1–16 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Li, X.-S., Li, J.-W., Li, H. & Jiang, T. Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Biosci. Rep. 40, BSR20200459 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Surmiak, E. et al. PD-L1 inhibitors: different classes, activities, and mechanisms of action. Int J. Mol. Sci. 22, 11797 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Li, C. et al. Peptide blocking of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction for cancer immunotherapy effect of PD-L1–targeting peptide on cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 6, 178–188 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Magiera‐Mularz, K. et al. Bioactive macrocyclic inhibitors of the PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune checkpoint. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 56, 13732–13735 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Caldwell, C. et al. Identification and validation of a PD-L1 binding peptide for determination of PDL1 expression in tumors. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Liu, H. et al. Discovery of low-molecular weight anti-PD-L1 peptides for cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 1–14 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Chen, Y. et al. Engineering a high-affinity PD-1 peptide for optimized Immune cell–mediated tumor therapy. Cancer Res. Treat. 54, 362 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Abbas, A. B. et al. Design and synthesis of A PD-1 binding peptide and evaluation of its anti-tumor activity. Int J. Mol. Sci. 20, 572 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Gurung, S. et al. Phage display-identified PD-L1-binding peptides reinvigorate T-cell activity and inhibit tumor progression. Biomaterials 247, 119984 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Moon, Y. et al. Anti-PD-L1 peptide-conjugated prodrug nanoparticles for targeted cancer immunotherapy combining PD-L1 blockade with immunogenic cell death. Theranostics 12, 1999 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Jeon, I. S. et al. Anticancer nanocage platforms for combined immunotherapy designed to harness immune checkpoints and deliver anticancer drugs. Biomaterials 270, 120685 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhong, T. et al. The biologically functional identification of a novel TIM3-binding peptide P26 in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 86, 783–792 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Zhai, W. et al. A novel cyclic peptide targeting LAG-3 for cancer immunotherapy by activating antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 1047–1060 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Zhou, X. et al. A novel d‐peptide identified by mirror‐image phage display blocks TIGIT/PVR for cancer immunotherapy. Angew. Chem. Int Ed999 59, 15114–15118 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Ma, P. C., Maulik, G., Christensen, J. & Salgia, R. c-Met: structure, functions and potential for therapeutic inhibition. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 22, 309–325 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Xia, C. et al. Novel Peptide CM 7 Targeted c-met with antitumor activity. Molecules 25, 451 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Tam, E. M. et al. Noncompetitive inhibition of hepatocyte growth factor-dependent Met signaling by a phage-derived peptide. J. Mol. Biol. 385, 79–90 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Shen, Y. et al. Discovery of HB-EGF binding peptides and their functional characterization in ovarian cancer cell lines. Cell Death Disco. 5, 1–11 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Yan, Y., Zuo, X. & Wei, D. Concise review: emerging role of CD44 in cancer stem cells: a promising biomarker and therapeutic target. Stem Cells Transl. Med 4, 1033–1043 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Matzke, A., Herrlich, P., Ponta, H. & Orian-Rousseau, V. A five-amino-acid peptide blocks Met-and Ron-dependent cell migration. Cancer Res. 65, 6105–6110 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Matzke-Ogi, A. et al. Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in pancreatic cancer models by interference with CD44v6 signaling. Gastroenterol 150, 513–525. e510 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Chalmin, F. et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J. Clin. Invest 120, 457–471 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Gobbo, J. et al. Restoring anticancer immune response by targeting tumor-derived exosomes with a HSP70 peptide aptamer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 108, djv330 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Stamatiades, G. A. & Kaiser, U. B. Gonadotropin regulation by pulsatile GnRH: signaling and gene expression. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 463, 131–141 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Srkalovic, G., Wittliff, J. L. & Schally, A. V. Detection and partial characterization of receptors for [D-Trp6]-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and epidermal growth factor in human endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res. 50, 1841–1846 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Tieva, Å., Stattin, P., Wikström, P., Bergh, A. & Damber, J. E. Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor expression in the human prostate. Prostate 47, 276–284 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Huerta-Reyes, M. et al. Treatment of breast cancer with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs. Front Oncol. 9, 943 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Lu, Y.-S., Wong, A. & Kim, H.-J. Ovarian function suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in premenopausal women. Front Oncol. 11, 700722 (2021).

  121. Di Lauro, L. et al. Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in metastatic male breast cancer: results from a pooled analysis. J. Hematol. Oncol. 8, 1–5 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Hofland, L. J. & Lamberts, S. W. Somatostatin receptors and disease: role of receptor subtypes. Baillieres Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 10, 163–176 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Druker, B. J. et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N. Eng. J. Med 344, 1038–1042 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Gurung, A., Bhattacharjee, A., Ali, M. A., Al-Hemaid, F. & Lee, J. Binding of small molecules at interface of protein–protein complex–A newer approach to rational drug design. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24, 379–388 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Ran, X. & Gestwicki, J. E. Inhibitors of protein–protein interactions (PPIs): an analysis of scaffold choices and buried surface area. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 44, 75–86 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Mason, J. M., M. Müller, K. & Arndt, K. M. (2008). iPEP: peptides designed and selected for interfering with protein interaction and function. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36, 1442–1447 (2008).

  127. Bruno, B. J., Miller, G. D. & Lim, C. S. Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery. Ther. Deliv. 4, 1443–1467 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Chen, X., Zaro, J. L. & Shen, W.-C. Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 1357–1369 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Sikora, K. et al. c‐myc oncogene expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer 59, 1289–1295 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Little, C. D., Nau, M. M., Carney, D. N., Gazdar, A. F. & Minna, J. D. Amplification and expression of the c-myc oncogene in human lung cancer cell lines. Nature 306, 194–196 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Blackwood, E. M. & Eisenman, R. N. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science 251, 1211–1217 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Li, L., Sun, W., Zhang, Z. & Huang, Y. Time-staggered delivery of docetaxel and H1-S6A, F8A peptide for sequential dual-strike chemotherapy through tumor priming and nuclear targeting. J. Control Release 232, 62–74 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Bidwell, G. L. III et al. Thermally targeted delivery of a c-Myc inhibitory polypeptide inhibits tumor progression and extends survival in a rat glioma model. PloS one 8, e55104 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Soucek, L. et al. Design and properties of a Myc derivative that efficiently homodimerizes. Oncogene 17, 2463–2472 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Soucek, L., Nasi, S. & Evan, G. Omomyc expression in skin prevents Myc-induced papillomatosis. Cell Death Differ. 11, 1038–1045 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Soucek, L. et al. Modelling Myc inhibition as a cancer therapy. Nature 455, 679–683 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Krumlauf, R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78, 191–201 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Bhatlekar, S., Viswanathan, V., Fields, J. Z. & Boman, B. M. Overexpression of HOXA4 and HOXA9 genes promotes self‐renewal and contributes to colon cancer stem cell overpopulation. J. Cell Physiol. 233, 727–735 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Morgan, R. et al. Antagonism of HOX/PBX dimer formation blocks the in vivo proliferation of melanoma. Cancer Res. 67, 5806–5813 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Shen, W.-F. et al. Hox homeodomain proteins exhibit selective complex stabilities with Pbx and DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 898–906 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Neuteboom, S. & Murre, C. Pbx raises the DNA binding specificity but not the selectivity of antennapedia Hox proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 4696–4706 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Plowright, L., Harrington, K., Pandha, H. & Morgan, R. HOX transcription factors are potential therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung cancer (targeting HOX genes in lung cancer). Br. J. Cancer 100, 470–475 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Moore, A. R., Rosenberg, S. C., McCormick, F. & Malek, S. RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged? Nat. Rev. Drug Disco. 19, 533–552 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Huang, L., Guo, Z., Wang, F. & Fu, L. KRAS mutation: from undruggable to druggable in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 1–20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  145. Garrigou, M. et al. Accelerated identification of cell active KRAS inhibitory macrocyclic peptides using mixture libraries and automated ligand identification system (ALIS) technology. J. Med. Chem. 65, 8961–8974 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Lim, S. et al. Discovery of cell active macrocyclic peptides with on-target inhibition of KRAS signaling. Chem. Sci. J. 12, 15975–15987 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Lee, Y. et al. Targeted Degradation of Transcription Coactivator SRC‐1 through the N‐Degron Pathway. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 59, 17548–17555 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Choi, S. R., Wang, H. M., Shin, M. H. & Lim, H.-S. Hydrophobic tagging-mediated degradation of transcription coactivator SRC-1. Int J. Mol. Sci. 22, 6407 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →