Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Peptide Boom Puts Pressure on Synthesis

July 1, 2008 (Vol. 28, No. 13) Drugs Already on the Market and in Clinical Studies Drive Novel Method Development Peptides are an emerging class of drugs, somewhere between a small molecule and a biologic. Their synthesis can be complex, which creates various

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

July 1, 2008 (Vol. 28, No. 13)

Drugs Already on the Market and in Clinical Studies Drive Novel Method Development

Peptides are an emerging class of drugs, somewhere between a small molecule and a biologic. Their synthesis can be complex, which creates various challenges in large-scale production and purification. There are a number of companies involved in peptide manufacture and at least 150 peptide projects in the preclinical or Phase I stage.

Key issues in peptide synthesis and manufacture are the number of amino acids in the peptide chain and whether synthesis is done using solution-phase (conventional chemistry) methods, solid-phase (resin-based) techniques, or a combination of the two.

“Big pharma is now interested in peptides, which are being perceived as being more user friendly and more readily available,” remarks Satish Joshi, Ph.D., evp of Solvay Peptisyntha (www.peptisyntha.com). After their relative lack of success with small molecules, companies see peptides as being more natural, which could be a big plus.

Solvay Peptisyntha originally specialized in solution-phase peptide synthesis. By 2001, the company realized that solid phase was becoming more prominent so it decided to develop that too. Solvay Peptisyntha is now in the process of enhancing its QC/QA and will expand its manufacturing as more peptides reach Phase II and Phase III.

Mimotopes (www.mimotopes.com) is one of the original peptide companies. It specializes in the supply of peptides for research and preclinical work to both academic and pharma customers. The firm creates peptide libraries for mapping antigen-binding sites or protein-protein interactions using its SynPhase Lanterns synthesis platform.

This approach, says Mimotopes CEO, Nick Ede, Ph.D., allows peptide synthesis at a higher purity than with more traditional resins. “We have developed new surfaces specifically designed for peptide synthesis, especially longer peptides with more than 25 amino acid residues.”

Mimotopes has traditionally worked at the discovery end. About two years ago, the firm identified a need at the larger-scale, value-added end of the business. “We decided to form a global peptide alliance with Genzyme Pharmaceuticals (www.genzymepharmaceuticals.com), which is one of the top five GMP manufacturers, and so become a one-stop shop for researchers to access peptide experts from research to commercialization,” Dr. Ede explains. “This alliance brings together two players with core expertise at either end of the development spectrum, each sharing its sweet spot to give peptide researchers and developers support.”

Dropping Costs

Daniel Erne, Ph.D., svp and CTO at Bachem (www.bachem.com), says that growth in the peptide market is being driven by the need for highly specific drugs for unmet medical need. Thus, his company is constantly investing. “In the last two years we have spent more than 30 million Swiss Francs ($28 million) each year, and it looks as if we are going to continue at this pace,” notes Dr. Erne. The company supplies big pharma and biotech, making up to hundreds of kilograms of peptide if necessary.

“There is a real ground swell in preclinical and Phase I work using peptides,” Dr. Ede adds. “This is because peptides often have higher specific activity and lower toxicity compared with many small molecule drugs.” Dr. Joshi adds that there are now some interesting peptides in clinical trials with, for instance, cyclized disulfide bridges or carboxyls coupled to hydroxyls in their backbones. One such candidate, with four disulfide bridges, is in Phase II/III for brain glioma.

There are also complex peptide vaccine candidates, which are cocktails of peptides. “The most important peptide drugs today are the hormone-dependent treatments,” according to Dr. Erne. These include treatments for cancer, diabetes, obesity, and bone metabolism. Additionally, companies are developing various peptide mimetic drugs such as Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ Phase II molecule for hepatitis C.

“Efforts in GMP synthesis have brought down the cost of developing peptides,” points out Dr. Ede. “Now it is not outrageous to take a 30 mer this far. This has paved the way to experimental drugs as therapeutics such as antidiabetic peptides.”

Roche’s anti-HIV agent, Fuzeon, and Amylin Pharmaceuticals’ Exenatide for diabetes are leading market expansion and driving down the cost of large-scale peptide synthesis. Both have a chain length that would not have been possible five to ten years ago. “Costs have dropped significantly, with better availability for FMOC amino acids, resins, and the basic needs,” explains Dr. Ede.

“The development of Fuzeon means new players came into peptide supply. There is far more growth than there was a decade ago.” As peptides become more important as viable drugs, they become commodity items, and there is more pressure upon prices.

Techniques

When it comes to the synthesis of peptides, whatever the scale, both solid-phase and solution-phase approaches are important. Many peptide companies are now adopting a hybrid technology, where peptide fragments are made by solid phase and then ligated in solution. Thus fragments of eight to fourteen amino acids might be synthesized on a solid-phase resin, removed and purified, and then these fragments will be coupled. Dr. Joshi reports that Solvay Peptisyntha is working on 120 mer peptides based upon 12 different 10 mer fragments, which is easier than making the peptide sequentially with 119 single steps.

Dr. Ede also notes that the hybrid approach is important now, making a protected fragment first, such as three or four amino acid fragments for synthesis of a >30 mer. In such a case, there may not be a requirement for formal purification of these fragments. “This is very much a trend in large-scale synthesis these days,” Dr. Ede comments. “Larger and larger peptides are becoming a reality with hybrid synthesis. The boundary where one shifts from chemical to biological synthesis has shifted. Soon we will be able to make cGMP peptides of more than 50 amino acids synthetically.”

There have been incremental improvements rather than any kind of quantum leap in the chemistries used to synthesize peptides, Dr. Erne explains. These include improved resins for solid-phase peptide synthesis, novel protecting groups for the amino acid components, and new coupling reagents. Novel peptides with unnatural amino acids and nonpeptide linkages have always been important because they can help prolong the otherwise short half-life of a natural peptide.

Mimotopes and Genzyme Pharmaceuticals are using pseudoproline reagents to obtain better crude peptides, which lowers development costs. Pseudoproline dipeptides are introduced into the synthesis of potentially difficult sequences that might otherwise aggregate, lowering yields and therefore increasing costs. “Pseudoprolines allow scale up to be developed in a way that will save money as you move into clinical trials,” says Dr. Ede. “It is a technique that is growing, and we are at the forefront.”

Scale Up

Large-scale peptide synthesis will remain within the realm of chemistry, at least for the foreseeable future. Starting production in cell culture, with all the issues around obtaining the right cells and vectors, is just too expensive and time consuming, and peptides with unnatural amino acids cannot be made with cells. Even relatively long peptides are made, successfully, by chemical synthesis.

When it comes to scaling up, the nature of the chemistry and the length of the peptide chain required are all important. “A solid-phase synthesis is a lot faster to develop for a new peptide structure,” says Dr Erne. “However, both are valid methods in their own right, and we carry out quite a few solution-phase syntheses at Bachem.”

Improvements in peptide chemistry and technology have pushed the limit of how big a peptide can be made in large quantities to as high as 80–100 amino acids. It is not easy, but it is possible to synthesize peptides of more than 100 amino acids in length. Most therapeutic peptides today, however, are 10–50 amino acids long.

When it comes to large-scale manufacture of peptides, a good understanding of the chemistry involved is a must. “If you design a process that cannot be scaled up, you are going to have tremendous problems,” says Dr. Erne. Scale-up applies to both synthesis and purification, and for the latter the target compound must be readily distinguishable and separable from its impurity.

When it comes to purification of peptides, ion exchange is becoming increasingly important and is taking over from reverse-phase HPLC. UPLC is also becoming important. Precipitation, done in a large vessel, and lyophilization are also key, although the latter is costly. Spray drying is a method that is being discussed although it can be problematic because peptides are known not to be particularly thermally stable. Sometimes it is difficult to separate the target compound from impurities that elute close to it. This is where UPLC can be useful. Mass spectrometry is used to see if the peptide peak is really pure.

A good synthesis with easy purification is the one with the lowest costs. As Dr. Erne points out, however, although peptides are expensive per unit weight owing to their complex structure, compared to drugs like aspirin, they are highly active, which reduces the actual cost per dose.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What is the concept of the immune self, and how has it evolved over the decades?

Adaptive immunity is the ability of specific lymphocytes to differentiate between self and non-self (foreign) antigens and defend the body by selectively destroying non-self-peptides. This concept is possibly the most crucial factor in several immunological medical domains and is increasingly being explored across cancer immunotherapy, vaccine design, pathogen identification, and autoimmune disorders (including allergies). A growing body of literature elucidates the importance of peptides, short amino acid chains linked via peptide bonds, in providing the adaptive immune system with the information required to effectively distinguish between self and non-self particles. This has resulted in the proposal of the ‘immune self’ concept, which postulates that self-similarity is a fundamental determinant of immune recognition. First introduced by Frank MacFarlane Burnet in 1949, the immune self-concept and its sister, the self-nonself theory, have substantially evolved over the decades. Initially driven by observations from Medawar’s early transplantation experiments, Nils K. Jerne (1974; eigen-behavior theory), Polly Matzinger (1994; danger theory), and most recently, evidence from research conducted independently by Waldmann, Mitchison, and Janeway has refined the immune self-concept from ‘all body elements are self, and foreign elements are non-self’ to the most recent ‘infectious non-self (foreign and usually harmful) versus noninfectious self (safe) elements.’

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
02A peptide identified in a fungus found in northern European pine forests possesses as much power as penicillin as well as vancomycin, according to an international team of researchers.

Reporting in the October 13 issue of Nature, a team from Denmark-based biotech company Novozymes, and researchers from Georgetown University Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, say they have isolated "plectasin," the first defensin ever found in fungi. The research was performed at Novozymes laboratories in Denmark. Defensins are peptides, miniature protein molecules that are produced by a wide range of animals to protect themselves against infection. Humans have defensins in their white blood cells and in their skin, for example, but it is believed that this new fungal defensin, plectasin, is more potent and targets certain bacteria more specifically. Indeed, when plectasin was tested in the laboratory and in animals, it proved to be highly effective against the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes, including strains that are now resistant to conventional antibiotics. These bacteria are responsible for such diseases as meningitis, community-acquired pneumonia, strep throat, life-threatening sepsis, and flesh destroying skin infections. The discovery of plectasin has implications for the development of defensins as a treatment against many common, and deadly, infections, and may initiate a new era of antibiotic discovery and development, said study co-author Michael Zasloff, M.D., Ph.D., Professor in the Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics at Georgetown University Medical Center. Zasloff says that the field of antibiotic development has not changed much since 1929 when Alexander Fleming realized that the fungal "bread mold" Penicillium, which had landed by chance in a Petri dish produced a substance that eliminated colonies of staphylococcal bacteria. "Most antibiotics used by humans are produced by fungi and certain soil bacteria," he said. "Using our existing tools of discovery, we have failed to uncover any new classes of antibiotics from these sources over the past decade. However, by utilizing a new genetic approach that allowed the team to discover plectasin, we now know that a whole class of antibiotics has been overlooked." "This finding (plectasin), and the existence of about 200,000 additional species of fungi, opens up a vast universe to explore for novel peptide antibiotics," said co-author Robert Lehrer, M.D., Distinguished Professor of Medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Plectasin, if proven safe and effective in humans, could be on the market by 2012, said Lehrer. Zasloff and Lehrer are known internationally as experts in antimicrobial peptides - the class of antibiotics that plectasin falls within - and in this study they collaborated with Novozymes, a Danish biotech company that led the research. Zasloff and Lehrer are the only two scientists from U.S. universities on the team of 20 researchers who co-authored the research paper. All life forms have to defend themselves against microbial invaders - bacteria, fungi, viruses - and to do this, they produce antimicrobial defensin peptides. In humans, defensins are made by specific white blood cells and immune cells that later engulf foreign invaders, and by the skin and mucous membranes, in order to kill microbes before they invade protective barriers. Researchers believe that fungi have a similar system of defense, especially since these plant-like organisms live off rotting matter, said Zasloff. "They must compete with other organisms, like bacteria and viruses, which also want to consume the same meal. In addition, they need to defend themselves from being eaten by the microbes which surround them." But he said no one had been able to find defensins in fungi using traditional research techniques, which involved growing fungi in liquid cultures and then testing the culture to see if it contained any antibiotic molecule. The research team instead used the latest genetic science to search for the defensins they thought fungi must have. Selecting the Pseudoplectania nigrella species of fungus may have been serendipitous, Lehrer said, but the Novozymes team used state-of-the-art biotechnology to intercept ,and interpret its genetic messages and exhibited tremendous skill in producing plectasin efficiently, economically, and in large amounts." "I started working on antimicrobial peptides over three decades ago, said Lehrer, and my laboratory first described human defensins in 1985. So, the discovery of plectasin makes me feel like a grandfather." Further examination revealed that this defensin, plectasin, resembles defensins found in spiders, scorpions, dragonflies and mussels - thus suggesting that the defensins found in insects, molluscs and fungi arose from a common ancestral gene, the researchers say. Based on this information, the scientists now believe that defensins appeared in living things more than a billion years ago. The investigators then turned to the National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control, the Danish equivalent of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, to test plectasin in the laboratory for antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria. It showed potent activity against several species of Gram-positive bacteria, and was especially active against S. pneumoniae (the leading cause of pneumonia), including all known clinical strains and those that are now resistant to conventional antibiotics. "That is important because increasing bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics threatens the future of many antibiotics in current use," Zasloff said. "In mouse studies, plectasin showed extremely low toxicity, and was as effective as vancomycin and penicillin in curing the animals of experimental peritonitis (inflammation of the lining of the abdominal cavity, which can be deadly) and pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae, the researchers report. "Although the precise mechanism by which plectasin exerts its antimicrobial activity is still under investigation, it may work by a mechanism that is very different from traditional antibiotics, Zasloff said. "As a group, defensins exhibit activity against many types of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and even viruses. It is entirely possible that fungal defensins will be discovered that could be developed against all of these human pathogens," Zasloff added.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
03How do these peptides act?

These peptides, like the parent compound AC253, acted as antagonists at the AMY receptor. They were also resistant to protein breakdown, and crossed the blood-brain barrier easily when injected into the abdominal cavity, to localize in the hippocampus, which is crucial in memory. These peptides protected the brain against beta-amyloid injury, and normalized the AD-associated impairment of the memory-associated long-term potentiation of nerve impulses in the hippocampus. They improved memory testing results, and reduced the level of inflammation in the brain. These effects appear to be mediated via the blockade of AMY receptors. For instance, inhibition of microglial AMY receptors reduce the activation of the inflammasome NLRP3. This reduces the secretion of inflammatory chemicals in the surrounding brain tissue, which offers another mechanism for lower amyloid production. In addition, these peptides increase the rate of outflow of amyloid beta from the brain, which also contributes to a lower level of amyloid after treatment. These marked changes all occurred within a relatively short span of treatment. A very important additional finding was that treatment with these peptides brought about improvement in mice which were showing signs of well-established AD in the brain as well as in their behavior. This is unique in that most therapies fail to affect the progress of AD once it has begun to manifest clinically. Peptides also have fewer off-target effects. Small molecules are easy to administer, inexpensive to make and cross the blood-brain barrier more rapidly. For this reason, the team resorted to computational tools and artificial intelligence to come up with a new small molecular drug based on these peptides. This can be taken orally, and is similar in size and structure to the medications used for medical conditions like high blood pressure. An optimized version is being developed to enable human trials to be conducted. The work so far has taken about two decades, building step upon painstaking step to come up with the right solution. However, says Jhamandas, “Occasionally you come across a discovery that has the potential to change the game in a very fundamental way, like hitting a home run, and I'm very excited that we are really on to something here.” Short amylin receptor antagonist peptides improve memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Rania Soudy, Ryoichi Kimura, Aarti Patel, Wen Fu, Kamaljit Kaur, David Westaway, Jing Yang & Jack Jhamandas. Scientific Reports, volume 9, Article number: 10942 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47255-9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47255-9

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
04What are functional peptides?

Conventional pharmacological studies on spices have traditionally focused on secondary metabolites like polyphenols, alkaloids, and terpenes. More recently, food science research has also examined spice proteins and their enzymatic hydrolysates, using proteomic methods such as liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to identify short bioactive peptide sequences released from larger precursor proteins.6 Once released during food processing, fermentation, or gastrointestinal digestion, these functional peptides can act as metabolic regulators, antimicrobials, or antioxidants.1 Functional peptides refer to specific protein fragments that, once released from their parent proteins, exert biological activities.1,2 In the context of foods, these activities are most often demonstrated using in vitro biochemical or cell-based assays, and their physiological relevance depends on bioavailability and dose.2 Unlike intact proteins, which can have the potential to be allergenic or difficult to absorb due to their complex tertiary structures, functional peptides may exhibit improved bioaccessibility, and some small peptides can cross the intestinal epithelial barrier via peptide transport systems. However, absorption efficiency varies substantially by peptide sequence and digestive conditions.6 Nutriomics and mechanistic investigations have established that the bioactivity of a peptide is dictated by its physicochemical properties, particularly its amino acid composition, molecular weight, and net charge. For example, the presence of hydrophobic amino acids like proline, leucine, and valine often correlates with high antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory activity.2,3 Smaller peptides, typically those less than three kilodaltons (kDa) in size, exhibit greater stability against proteolytic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract.3 Moreover, cationic peptides are particularly effective as antimicrobial agents through their electrostatic interactions with bacterial membranes.3

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
05How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
comparison

Comparisons

Side-by-side pages for commonly compared peptides and research compounds.

Source: peptideuniv.com
Research context

Read sources and limitations before applying a claim.

Longevity, Performance & Obesity Research

A research peptide formulation developed to investigate metabolic regulation, mitochondrial function, and nutrient-sensing pathways.

Source: mypeptidematch.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →