Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Oral GLP-1 drug elecoglipron helps adults lose up to 11.8% body weight

A once-daily oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist delivered progressive, dose-dependent weight loss without food or fluid restrictions, supporting larger phase 3 trials for long-term weight management. Study: Elecoglipron, an oral small molecule GLP-1 re

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

A once-daily oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist delivered progressive, dose-dependent weight loss without food or fluid restrictions, supporting larger phase 3 trials for long-term weight management.

Study: Elecoglipron, an oral small molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with obesity or overweight (VISTA): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Image Credit: grinny / Shuttertock

In a recent study published in The Lancet, a group of researchers evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral non-peptide small-molecule elecoglipron for weight management in adults with obesity or overweight and at least one weight-related health condition without diabetes.

Background

More than one billion people are living with obesity, a condition linked to cardiovascular disease, hypertension, sleep apnea, and reduced quality of life. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists provide an effective treatment option for obesity-related weight loss.

Currently available options can require injections or strict dosing conditions, which may discourage patients from continuing their use for the long term. Due to the continual rise in the number of people living with obesity, there is an increased demand for easily accessible medications that provide significant long-term weight loss while still fitting into patients' daily routines.

Oral medications that do not require fasting or special administration conditions may improve accessibility and patient acceptance. Further research is needed to identify effective and practical oral therapies that provide sustained weight reduction with acceptable safety profiles.

About the Study

Researchers conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial across Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Adults with obesity, defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher, or overweight, defined as having a BMI of 27 kg/m² or greater with at least one weight-related condition, were eligible to participate. Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, glycated hemoglobin A1c of 6.5% or higher at screening, recent diabetes medication use, or recent weight-loss medication use were excluded from the trial.

A total of 310 adult participants were randomly assigned to receive either active oral elecoglipron or oral placebo. The elecoglipron groups received once-daily tablets using the following regimens: 5 mg without titration; 15 mg without titration; 50 mg with every-4-week dose escalation; 75 mg with weekly dose escalation; or 75 mg with every-2-week dose escalation. All participants received treatment for 36 weeks after baseline assessments were completed.

All participants received counseling on dietary and exercise behaviors, including education on achieving a daily caloric deficit of 500-750 kcal. Researchers also assessed participants for body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, laboratory values, adverse events, electrocardiograms, and suicidality and mood-related assessments throughout the study period.

The primary outcomes were the percentage change in body weight from baseline and the proportion of participants who lost at least 5% of their body weight at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included measurements of weight loss at 36 weeks and evaluations of participant safety.

Study Results

In the present study, a total of 472 individuals were screened, 310 met eligibility requirements, and were then randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. Overall, 288 participants completed the trial; of those participants, 231 completed their assigned treatment. The average age of participants was 48.4 years, the average weight was 106.9 kg, and the average BMI was 38.2 kg/m². Approximately 73% of all participants were female.

Elecoglipron produced clear dose-dependent reductions in body weight. Estimated average weight loss ranged from 2.6% to 10.5% for the 5 mg and 75 mg once-daily weekly-titration groups, respectively, at week 26. Those on placebo lost an average of only 0.6% of their body weight. The estimated proportion of participants who achieved at least 5% weight loss was 40.4%-88.8% in the low- and high-dose groups, compared with 15.6% in the placebo group.

Weight loss continued throughout the study, suggesting that maximal weight loss might not yet have been achieved during the 36-week treatment period. At the end of treatment, average weight losses were 11.8% in the 75 mg once-daily weekly-titration group and 11.1% in the 75 mg once-daily every-2-week titration group. The placebo group's average weight loss was only 0.3%.

Higher doses of elecoglipron increased the likelihood that participants would lose significant weight. By week 36, across all elecoglipron groups, between 8.8% and 62.5% lost at least 10% of baseline body weight compared with 4.5% of placebo participants. The proportion achieving at least a 15% reduction in body weight ranged from 4.9% to 39.8% across the elecoglipron groups, whereas only 2.7% of placebo patients achieved a similar reduction.

The use of elecoglipron was associated with additional exploratory changes beyond weight loss; for example, participants taking elecoglipron experienced reductions in BMI, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and markers of inflammation such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Improvements generally became greater as the dose increased. These findings should be interpreted as changes in cardiometabolic risk markers rather than evidence of reduced clinical events.

The safety profile was broadly consistent with the safety profile observed for other GLP-1 receptor agonists. The adverse events that occurred most frequently included nausea, constipation, diarrhea, headache, and vomiting.

Generally, gastrointestinal adverse events were mild to moderate, mostly occurred during dose titration, and often resolved over time. There were no deaths during the trial, and no clinically diagnosed cases of pancreatitis were reported.

Serious adverse events occurred in eight of 98 participants in the two 75 mg elecoglipron groups and two of 81 placebo participants, although the authors reported no meaningful difference in the distribution of event types.

A small number of participants experienced gallbladder-related events or temporary elevations in bilirubin, but most cases were manageable and did not require permanent discontinuation of treatment.

Conclusion

The study suggests that once-daily oral elecoglipron produced clinically meaningful and progressive weight loss in adults living with obesity or overweight without diabetes. Higher doses achieved substantial reductions in body weight, with benefits continuing through 36 weeks and no evidence of a weight loss plateau.

In addition to promoting weight loss, elecoglipron was associated with reductions in multiple exploratory cardiometabolic risk markers, including blood pressure, waist circumference, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The overall safety profile observed in the trial was consistent with the safety profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonist medications, including predominantly manageable gastrointestinal adverse events.

As a phase 2 trial, the study was not designed to assess long-term durability, rare adverse events, or cardiovascular outcomes. Based on these data, further phase 3 trials evaluating elecoglipron as a potentially effective and convenient oral treatment for long-term weight management are warranted.

AstraZeneca funded the trial, and the funder contributed to the study design, conduct, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and report writing.

Download your PDF copy by clicking here.

  • Davies, M. J., Aroda, V. R., Rosenstock, J., Capehorn, M., Pedersen, S. D., Morizzo, E., Malhotra, S., Johansson, P. A., Grice, D., Andersson, A., Rizi, E. P., & Sjöström, C. D. (2026). Elecoglipron, an oral small molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with obesity or overweight (VISTA): A multicentre, phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The Lancet. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00748-8. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00748-8/fulltext

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What were the findings of this research and how did this extend the understanding of COTI-2’s mechanism of action?

Extensive data from the experiments have demonstrated that:

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
02Why does diabetes increase peripheral artery complications?

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive condition characterized by abnormal narrowing and blocking of blood vessels, which is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular disease-related mortality. The condition affects about 236 million individuals worldwide. The prevalence of PAD is particularly high among patients with type 2 diabetes, which makes these patients five times more likely to undergo an amputation and twice as likely to die, often at a younger age than people without diabetes. Considering the significant negative impact of PAD in diabetic patients, international clinical guidelines have recommended using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitors) in individuals with type 2 diabetes and PAD to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. This systematic review and meta-analysis of recent evidence aimed to evaluate the impact of GLP-1RAs on major limb events in individuals with type 2 diabetes and PAD. A total of two randomized clinical trials and ten cohort studies involving 418,282 participants with type 2 diabetes and PAD were included in the final analysis.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
03In safety assessment, the consequences of being wrong are significant. How do you think about uncertainty and model limitations for safety and discovery?

Uncertainty and model limitations are critical in safety assessment. There is clearly greater potential for animal or human harm from an incorrect safety assessment than from making the wrong molecule in early discovery, although uncertainty matters in both contexts. It is important to distinguish different types of uncertainty. Aleatoric uncertainty reflects irreducible randomness in a task, while epistemic uncertainty is model-related, such as hallucinations or lack of knowledge. For LLM systems, we use multiple methods to measure consistency and we have built fact-checking approaches in which a separate LLM independently verifies the primary engine's outputs. For QSAR models, including our SAR work around seizure liability, we can use statistical metrics such as confidence intervals to quantify and communicate uncertainty. Understanding that uncertainty exists and communicating it in both safety and discovery is critical. Uncertainty metrics tell us where potential blind spots may exist in our modelling allowing us to take action to improve over time. This applies to both safety and discovery. The aim is not to pretend AI removes uncertainty, but to make uncertainty visible so scientists can make better-informed decisions. Download the Full PDF to Revisit James McDonagh's Insights on AI in Drug Safety Discovery

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
04What knowledge has your research provided, specifically regarding Alzheimer's disease?

The main protein or peptide in Alzheimer's disease patients is something called beta-amyloid. It has a 42 amino acid chain, and accumulates in the plaque between nerve cells in Alzheimer's disease patients. Beta-amyloid has been found to epimerize. Certain amino acids epimerize in the beta-amyloid at specific locations, and it turns out those amino acids are mainly aspartic acid and serine. There was no good way to analyze for such aberrations in beta-amyloid until now, and we have found a number of techniques that not only detect it, but can point out exactly where, within the beta-amyloid chain, the aberration is occurring and if there are more aberrations in Alzheimer's patients than in normal people. Image Credit:Shutterstock/Tavarius

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
05Can you please give an overview of BenevolentBio?

What we're trying to do here at Benevolent is develop systems and processes that allow us to tap into the huge amount of public information and some propriety databases that we have paid to access and through that, generate hypotheses which our scientists can then triage. We've got over ten times the amount of information in our database at present (and it’s growing) than we believe that companies such as Watson have. Bringing that and filtering the signals from the ‘noise’ to our experienced drug discovery chemists and biologists, means, firstly, we can reduce the amount of time we take to triage new hypotheses, and secondly, we can develop more predictive chemical tools to allow us to make better molecules and also to reposition existing molecules for new indication.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →