Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Old Protein Gains New Senses

It is fairly common, even for many scientists, to be dismissive of carbohydrate molecules, mentioning them almost as an afterthought when describing normal cellular functions, especially since DNA and proteins constitute the bulk of the metabolic workload. How

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

It is fairly common, even for many scientists, to be dismissive of carbohydrate molecules, mentioning them almost as an afterthought when describing normal cellular functions, especially since DNA and proteins constitute the bulk of the metabolic workload. However, there is one area where carbohydrates, specifically glycan structures, are indispensable: cell-cell recognition.

Differences in structure and bonding create glycan fingerprints that many cells use to determine if neighbors they come in contact with are friend or foe. This is not a new concept to biology and has been studied for many years, yet several key features in the recognition process have eluded scientists.

Now, a collaborative team lead by researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison has discovered a new ability of a well-studied protein, which resides within the lungs and intestines, to distinguish between human cells and bacterial cells. The scientists show that the protein, called intelectin-1, is able to selectively recognize glycan residues that reside on the surface of cells—illuminating a previously unrecognized line of defense against microbial invaders.

“This has the potential to change the game in terms of how we combat microbes,” said senior author Laura Kiessling, Ph.D., professor of chemistry and biochemistry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The findings from this study were published today in Nature Structural and Molecular Biology “Recognition of microbial glycans by human intelectin-1.”

Intelectin was first isolated from the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis and found to be involved in embryonic development. Once the crystal structure was determined, scientists discovered that the protein contained carbohydrate recognition domains and observed its role in many cellular processes, such as tissue development and inflammation. However, the protein’s function in host-cell defense and ability to distinguish multiple types of pathogens is a new and exciting find.

“The protein is upregulated with infection,” explained Dr. Kiessling, “and while no one has yet shown that it is an antimicrobial protein, there are multiple lines of evidence that suggest it is.”

Dr. Kiessling and her colleagues were able to establish that intelectin has all the properties needed to function in the immune system's surveillance complex—a logical discovery as the protein is found mostly in the cells in the intestine and respiratory system, the two most likely entry points for microbial pathogens.

By exposing human intelectin to a collection of both human and microbial glycans, the Wisconsin researchers found that intelectin could recognize different kinds of microbes as well as distinguish between microbial and mammalian glycans. The investigators surmised that intelectin has evolved a role within the immune system over millions of years, as the protein has homologs in a wide array of vertebrates and invertebrates.

Interestingly, the glycans to which intelectin attaches can be immensely different. For example, in humans less than 35 chemical building blocks are used to make the cell surface molecules. Yet, bacteria have evolved to create more than 700 chemical building blocks for glycans. This immense increase in diversity can make accurate detection difficult.

“Human intelectin just recognizes a small portion of the glycan, a shared feature like a handle,” Dr. Kiessling stated. “Then it can recognize when the handles appear, even when different types of bacteria make different glycans.”

Dr. Kessling and her colleagues believe that future work in this area could aid in the rational design of novel therapeutics to thwart microbial infections, especially those becoming resistant to current medications.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →