Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Obesity linked to overfeeding during infancy: Study

Two studies have found that babies who put on weight too fast in their first months are more likely to become fat as adults. The studies showed that at 5–8 years old, children who were given the enriched formula had more body fat than those who were given norm

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Two studies have found that babies who put on weight too fast in their first months are more likely to become fat as adults. The studies showed that at 5–8 years old, children who were given the enriched formula had more body fat than those who were given normal formula. This suggests that faster weight gain as a baby causes children to gain a higher proportion of fat mass when they are older. This corroborates with earlier research that say “overfeeding” in infancy – in this case by using nutrient-enriched formula – increases the risk of obesity later in life. Scientists say that the risk is irrespective of gender, height in childhood or socioeconomic status.

The studies had their share of flaws. Both of the studies had a high rate of drop-outs that could have skewed the results. Also, the studies did not look at children who had normal birth weight. One of the studies did not look at Body Mass Index (BMI) - a standard measure of obesity. Instead it looked at the children’s fat mass. As the children were not followed up into adolescence and adulthood, it is incorrect to say that these children were “primed for a life of obesity”.

The study was carried out by researchers from University College London, University Hospital Nottingham, Leicester General Hospital, Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Glasgow, the Wishaw General Hospital, the Southern General Hospital in Glasgow and the Danone Research centre for Specialized Nutrition in the Netherlands. It was funded by the Medical Research Council (UK) and other organizations, with contributions from Farley’s Health Products and Nutricia Ltd. It appeared in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

The results collated the findings of two randomized controlled trials. For the studies the teams included newborn babies as soon as possible after birth from 10 UK hospitals to take part in the two studies. First Study recruited babies between 1993 and 1995, and second study between 2003 and 2005. All the babies were born at full term (after 37 weeks) but were small for gestational age (SGA). The babies in study 1 were below the 10th percentile for their gestational age and those in study 2 were below the 20th percentile, according to UK growth charts. The mothers were given an option of feeding their baby as they wished.

Babies who were bottle fed were randomly assigned to receive either standard formula (the control group) or a nutrient-enriched formula (the intervention), with a higher protein and energy content designed to promote rapid growth. The formulas were given until the babies were nine months old in study 1 and until they were six months old in study 2. A total of 545 babies were originally enrolled in the two studies, and in study 1 a reference group of 175 breastfed babies was also recruited. In both studies, researchers estimated fat mass using callipers to measure skin fold thickness.

As results only 243 of the original 545 infants could be followed up. In both studies, fat mass in those who had been given normal formula was lower than in those given the enriched formula (after adjustment for sex) at 5–8 years of age. In the first study children who had been on normal formula had 38% less fat mass than those in the enriched formula group. In the second study children who had been on normal formula had 18% less fat mass than those in the enriched formula group. A further analysis suggested that in the group of breastfed babies, faster weight gain in infancy was also associated with greater fat mass later.

According to Professor Atul Singhal from the MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre at the Institute of Child Health in London at least 20% of adult obesity is caused by over-feeding in infancy. “When they are exposed to high-protein, high-fat foods, they are more likely to become obese,” he said as a message to parents and health professionals. Singhal is the lead author of the studies. “This study robustly demonstrates a link between early nutrition and having more fat in later life in humans – a finding suggested by previous studies and confirmed in many other animals. Our findings are strong, consistent, show a dose-response effect, and are biologically plausible,” he said. He explained that this study had wider implications. “In public-health terms, it supports the case in the general population for breastfeeding – as it is harder to over-feed a breastfed baby,” Singhal said.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How does vitamin D strengthen the immune system?

More specifically, the study showed that the female patient produced very few cathelicidins, which is a natural toxin found in the immune cells of the lungs needed to fight tuberculosis. In most people infected by tuberculosis, tuberculosis bacteria attack the immune cells of the lungs. The immune cells fight the bacteria by eating them. But the tuberculosis bacterium has developed various evasive mechanisms that reduce the immune cells’ ability to digest and thus to kill the Mtb. “You could say that the tuberculosis bacterium has developed a way to lull the immune cells to sleep. This enables the disease the hide inside the immune cells, making it invisible to other parts of the immune system,” Martin Kongsbak-Wismann explains. This is where vitamin D enters the picture. Because vitamin D is able to counteract the soporific effect of the tuberculosis bacteria by making the immune cells produce more of the cathelicidin toxin. “Cathelicidin is like a microscopic needle that is able to pierce the tuberculosis bacteria. And when it does, it weakens the bacteria’s soporific effect on the immune cells. This restores the immune cells’ ability to kill tuberculosis bacteria,” says Martin Kongsbak-Wismann and adds: “We were amazed by the effect of vitamin D. In immune cells from healthy control subjects, vitamin D improved the cells’ ability to fight Mtb, whereas in the female patient’s immune cells we saw no response to vitamin D. This shows that vitamin D is key to the immune system’s ability to fight Mtb and prevent tuberculosis.” Al-Jaberi, F.A.H., et al. (2022) Reduced vitamin D-induced cathelicidin production and killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages from a patient with a non-functional vitamin D receptor: A case report. Frontiers in Immunology. doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1038960.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
02What is deep learning and how do you think it could be used to improve the drug discovery paradigm?

You're average biomedical researcher is dealing with a huge amount of new information every day. You're getting over 10,000 new publications uploaded on a daily basis worldwide across all the biomedical journals and databases, so there is no way that one researcher can actually even access, let alone read all these huge amounts of data. What we have to do is use deep learning to be able to help us ingest all that data and do some initial deep triage of that data to surface new therapeutic opportunities. It’s meant to provide insight for our biologists and chemists, so they can actually deal with a usable amount of information.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
03With graph neural networks, foundation models, and diffusion models transforming the field, what can we predict reliably today that was difficult a decade ago and are there still any blind spots?

One major example is protein structure. Methods such as AlphaFold and Boltz-2 have transformed how we generate 3D structural data. Accurate protein structure prediction has been a decades-old challenge, and while there is still work to do on underrepresented protein classes, these models have opened an extraordinary pathway. We have also seen progress in multi-output models. Just over a decade ago (circa 2013), toxicology and property prediction models often focused on one endpoint at a time. Now, multi-output models, especially from methods such as graph neural networks (GNNs) and other deep learning methods, can predict multiple endpoints simultaneously. This allows for transfer learning between related properties. That creates opportunities across ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) prediction and toxicology. Another exciting area is machine learning potentials. Molecular simulations traditionally rely on fixed mathematical functions to describe molecular interactions, but neural potentials can now replace or augment those functions. They can, in many cases, provide highly accurate simulations and structures at lower computational cost than quantum chemistry. However, its not just down to model architectures. The biggest blind spot behind all of these advances remains careful data curation, annotation, and collection. Open databases for example ChEMBL, PubChem and Chemspider together with data initiatives such as OpenADEMT and OpenBind to name but a few are making notable progress here. We still see some data for example on formulation chemistry often receiving less attention. Its is not just about data scale, but quality that is critical here to. Accessible high quality data sets are the fuel of AI methods. Architecture matters, but high-quality, accessible and abundant data is also absolutely critical.

Source: www.news-medical.net ↗
04What are carbs?

Your weight loss plan should keep you healthy and strong as you lose the extra weight. Many plans include a diet low in carbohydrates. Carb cycling is a method of optimizing your carbohydrate intake to meet your needs while dieting, fasting, and working out. When you're carb cycling, you consume carbs to meet your needs on some days and avoid them on other days. The aim of carb cycling is to consume carbohydrates when your body needs them and exclude them at other times. Such strategies in your diet plan can help your weight loss efforts. Carbohydrates, or carbs, are a significant part of the average human diet. Along with proteins and fats, they make up the bulk of your daily meals. Most carbohydrates are broken down by your body into glucose to provide energy for your cells and tissues. Carbohydrates in your diet are of three types — sugars, starches, and fiber. Sugars are simple carbs. Glucose, sugar (sucrose), lactose found in milk, and fructose found in fruits, are naturally occurring sugars. Your body metabolizes these molecules rapidly to yield energy. Starches are complex carbs. They're large molecules that consist of hundreds of molecules of simple sugars joined together. Your body needs to break them down to release energy. Starches are found in bread, potatoes, peas, corn, cereals, and pasta. Fiber is also a complex carbohydrate. Human bodies can't break down these large molecules, so they provide no energy. They're usually excreted as they are in the feces. They add bulk to your meal, so you feel full. Fiber in the diet helps avoid constipation and lowers blood sugar and cholesterol levels. Carbohydrates are an essential part of your diet. A typical diet provides 45% to 65% of its calories from carbohydrates. If you have 2,000 calories a day, you should have about 275 grams of carbohydrates. Always try to choose healthy foods for your carb intake:

Source: www.medicinenet.com ↗
05Are supplements necessary?

Daily, if you eat a balanced diet that includes healthy foods, you technically should not need a vitamin supplement. A healthy diet incorporates lean proteins, healthy fats, grains, fruits, and vegetables. But if you do not have a balanced diet, you may be considering hair, skin, and nail vitamins. Some people prefer supplements, sometimes choosing a multivitamin that can supply all of your essential minerals and vitamins. But taking too much of vitamins or unnecessary supplements is wasteful because the body gets rid of excess vitamins and minerals or, worse, it can be dangerous. The following is a guide to choosing which vitamins you may want to consider supplementing and when. Deficiencies in the nutrients that keep the skin, hair, and nails healthy can cause changes over time. For example, not enough intake of vitamins A and E, along with not enough biotin, can cause scaly and rough skin patches, eczema, and hair loss. If there is a deficiency, vitamins will help. However, if there is no deficiency, there is no clear evidence that supplements will make a difference. No research studies concluded that supplements treat or prevent age-related, natural hair damage or loss or lead to healthier skin. Two studies in the early 1990s did suggest that a biotin supplement may cause the hair to become stronger and strengthen weak nails. However, the studies were small and not reproduced.

Source: www.medicinenet.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →