Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Nuclear Receptor’s Side Pocket Could Cue Up New Drugs

Drug development is like a game of molecular billiards in which one must sink drugs into receptors. In the case of nuclear receptors, which are targeted by about 13% of all available pharmaceuticals, the game can be particularly challenging. It has been 50 yea

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Drug development is like a game of molecular billiards in which one must sink drugs into receptors. In the case of nuclear receptors, which are targeted by about 13% of all available pharmaceuticals, the game can be particularly challenging. It has been 50 years since an effective means of binding a novel site on a nuclear receptor has been identified.

Calling receptor-binding shots in drug development, however, may soon become easier. A team of scientists representing Eindhoven University, Merck Research Laboratories, and Leiden University has announced an exciting new find: an entirely new way of antagonizing a human nuclear receptor. Specifically, they have found a novel allosteric binding site on the nuclear receptor called RORγt. It is almost as though they found a previously overlooked side pocket on a billiards table.

The new find could have implications beyond the RORγt receptor, which is just 1 of 48 nuclear receptors. If the new approach to allosteric, antagonistic binding to the RORγt receptor could be extended to the other 47 nuclear receptors, an extensive new class of drugs that function differently from, and potentially better than, current medications could be created.

“This news is going to have a major effect on the field of drug development,” said Luc Brunsveld, Ph.D., a professor of chemical biology at Eindhoven University of Technology. “I anticipate a flow of further research geared to investigating the potential of this concept.”

The new findings appeared December 6 in the journal Nature Communications, in an article entitled, “Identification of an allosteric binding site for RORγt inhibition.”

“Co-crystallization of the ligand binding domain (LBD) of RORγt with a series of small-molecule antagonists demonstrates occupancy of a previously unreported allosteric binding pocket,” wrote the article’s authors. “Binding at this non-canonical site induces an unprecedented conformational reorientation of helix 12 in the RORγt LBD, which blocks cofactor binding.”

The RORγt receptor plays an important role in auto-immune diseases like rheumatism and Crohn's disease. The new means of binding this receptor has the potential advantage of serving as a kind of back door that cannot be accessed by endogenous ligands. This suggests that any compensatory mechanism the human body may make in ligand production would be less likely to induce resistance and decrease efficacy.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →