Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Novel Bioprocess Uses Bursting Bacteria to Produce Biologic Drugs

Biomedical engineers at Duke University have developed a new platform to create biologic drugs using specially engineered bacteria that burst and release proteins when they sense that their capsule is becoming too crowded. The platform relies on two main compo

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Biomedical engineers at Duke University have developed a new platform to create biologic drugs using specially engineered bacteria that burst and release proteins when they sense that their capsule is becoming too crowded. The platform relies on two main components: the engineered bacteria, called swarmbots, that are programmed to sense the density of their peers within their container, and the biomaterial that confines the swarmbots, a porous capsule that can shrink in response to changes in the bacterial population. When it shrinks, the capsule squeezes out targeted proteins created by the captive bacteria.

This self-contained platform could make it easier for researchers to create, analyze, and purify diverse biologics for use in small-scale biomanufacturing, according to the scientists who published their study (“Versatile biomanufacturing through stimulus-responsive cell-material feedback”) in Nature Chemical Biology.

“Small-scale production of biologics has great potential for enhancing the accessibility of biomanufacturing. By exploiting cell-material feedback, we have designed a concise platform to achieve versatile production, analysis, and purification of diverse proteins and protein complexes. The core of our technology is a microbial swarmbot, which consists of a stimulus-sensitive polymeric microcapsule encapsulating engineered bacteria. By sensing the confinement, the bacteria undergo programmed partial lysis at a high local density. Conversely, the encapsulating material shrinks responding to the changing chemical environment caused by cell growth, squeezing out the protein products released by bacterial lysis,” the investigators wrote.

“This platform is then integrated with downstream modules to enable quantification of enzymatic kinetics, purification of diverse proteins, quantitative control of protein interactions, and assembly of functional protein complexes and multienzyme metabolic pathways. Our work demonstrates the use of the cell-material feedback to engineer a modular and flexible platform with sophisticated yet well-defined programmed functions.”

The biomanufacturing process involves a series of sophisticated steps including cell culturing, protein isolation, and protein purification, each of which requires delicate infrastructure to ensure efficiency and quality. For industrial operations, these steps are carried out on a large scale. While this helps produce large quantities of certain molecules, this setup is not flexible nor financially viable when researchers need to produce small amounts of diverse biologics or work in resource-limited settings, noted the team from Duke.

The new technology was developed by Lingchong You, PhD, a professor of biomedical engineering, and a former Duke postdoctoral researcher, Zhuojun Dai, PhD, now an associate professor at Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technologies. In the new study, they show how their new platform uses communication between swarmbots and their capsule to achieve versatile production, analysis, and purification of diverse proteins and protein complexes.

In an earlier proof of concept, You and his team engineered a non-pathogenic strain of E. coli bacteria to produce an antidote to antibiotics when the bacteria reached a certain density. These swarmbots were then confined to a capsule, which was bathed in antibiotics. If a bacterium left the capsule it was destroyed, but if it remained inside the container where the population density was high, it survived.

“Our first study essentially showed one-way communication, where the cells could sense the environment within the capsule, but the environment didn’t react to the cells,” said You. “Now, we have two-way communication, the engineered swarmbots can still sense their density and their confinement, but we have introduced a material that can respond when the bacterial population inside it changes. It’s like the two components are talking to each other, and collectively they give you very dynamic behavior.”

Once the population inside the capsule reaches a certain density, the bacteria start to “pop,” releasing all of their cellular contents, including the protein product of interest. At the same time, this bacterial growth changes the chemical environment within the capsule, causing it to shrink. As it shrinks, it squeezes out the protein released from the bursting cells while the bacteria and cell debris are kept within the capsule.

Once the proteins are collected, researchers can add a nutrient replenishment to the dish as a cue for the capsules to enlarge. This resets the interior environment and allows the bacteria to begin growing again, restarting the process. According to You, this cycle can be repeated for up to a week.

To make the approach useful for biomanufacturing, the team added the capsules to a microfluidic chip, which included a chamber for them to detect and quantify which proteins were released. This could be replaced with a purification chamber to prepare the proteins for use in biologics.

“It’s a very compact process. You don’t need electricity, and you don’t need a centrifuge to produce and isolate these proteins,” said You. “It makes this a good platform for biomanufacturing. You have the ability to produce a certain type of medicine in a very compact format at a low cost, and it’s easy to deliver. On top of that, this platform offers an easy way to produce multiple proteins simultaneously.”

According to You, this ease of use has enabled the team to produce, quantify, and purify more than 50 different proteins in collaboration with the lab of Ashutoshi Chilkoti, PhD, the Alan L. Kaganov professor and chair of the department of biomedical engineering at Duke. They have also explored how their platform can simplify the creation of protein complexes, which are structures made from multiple proteins.

On a proof-of-concept experiment to produce a fatty acid synthesis pathway from multiple enzymes, “we were able to use seven versions of our microbial swarmbots, each of which was programmed to produce a different enzyme,” said You. “Usually, to produce a metabolic pathway you’d need to balance the supply chain, which could involve upregulating the expression of one enzyme and downregulating the expression of another. With our platform you don’t need to do that, you just need to set the correct ratio of swarmbots.”

“This technology is incredibly versatile,” he said. “That’s a capability we want to take advantage of.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →