Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

New Work Opens Door to Manipulating Aberrant Calcium Signaling in Immune System

Scientists at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) have reported additional work on how calcium-sensing protein STIM1 signals that it’s time to initiate calcium retrieval and then relays that message to the calcium channel ORAI. This research, says the

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

“We’ve known for a decade that STIM1 protein moved toward the plasma membrane to open ORAI channels when ER calcium levels drop,” says Patrick Hogan, Ph.D., a professor in the division of signaling and gene expression. “Our recent work shows how the STIM machinery functions on a molecular level. Understanding these mechanisms is critical, as calcium is important for a panoply of immune responses.”

The researchers’ current work (“Calcium sensing by the STIM1 ER-luminal domain”) appears in Nature Communications while an earlier study (“Coiled-Coil Formation Conveys a STIM1 Signal from ER Lumen to Cytoplasm“), which was published in Cell Reports, revealed how STIM1 protein elongates as it switches from a resting to an activated state when calcium reserves drop.

STIM1 is a transmembrane protein that spans the ER wall: one end pokes a calcium-sensing dipstick-like tail inside the reserve; in a resting, calcium-replete state, the other arm juts out from the ER but remains tucked up against the ER wall, out of touch with dormant ORA1 channels that dot the cell membrane.

The group defined what happens when calcium levels fall by constructing and testing the behavior of genetically-modified STIM1 proteins in cultured cells. Analysis showed that calcium loss from the sensor tail caused the membrane-spanning regions of pairs of STIM1 proteins to pull together inside the ER wall, prompting the outer arms to extend toward the cell membrane. That shape change brought STIM1 close enough to ORAI channels to reach out and open them, allowing calcium to flow back into cells.

“The first paper showed how STIM1 communicates with a channel protein in the plasma membrane via a structural change,” says Dr. Hogan. “Our latest paper takes that process a step back in time and reveals how calcium loss inside the ER initiates that change.”

Put simply, the more recent paper focuses on the workings of STIM1’s calcium-sensing dipstick. Previously, protein chemists found that calcium inside the ER binds to a structural motif in the STIM1 tail called an “EF-hand” and proposed that when the hand was empty, STIM1 activated ORAI. Aparna Gudlur, Ph.D., an instructor in Dr. Hogan’s lab and the new paper’s first author, explains that it isn’t quite that simple. “We now report that multiple calciums bind not only to the EF-hand but to other sites in the STIM1 ER domain, and that the sites depend on each other,” she says. “That revises the concept of how STIM1 gets activated.”

Not only that, but according to Dr. Hogan, the prevailing belief had been that calcium dissociation causes STIM1’s dipstick-like region inside the ER to unfold dramatically and assume a chaotic structure, a disorderliness deemed necessary for ORAI activation. “We now show that when calcium is low in the ER this region doesn’t unfold but instead acquires a novel but stable structure that favors interaction with the ORAI channel,” he says. “That’s important because it means that interaction could be targeted by inhibitors.”

Drug companies have already sought to develop drugs to block ORAI calcium channels as a means to halt calcium-dependent immune responses in autoimmune disease or in inflammatory conditions like acute pancreatitis. Some ORAI-blocking drugs are currently in Phase I and II clinical trials and thus far appear nontoxic. But their therapeutic potential remains unknown.

Dr. Gudlur speculates that developing direct ORAI/STIM1 blockers as therapies may be just an initial step, as both proteins are common to many cell types. “Targeting ORAI channels as a way to block excess calcium signaling only in certain cells may require greater specificity,” she says. “Our work is a first step in identifying cell-specific factors capable of modulating ORAI/STIM1 activity. Once we find them, drug screens targeting those factors would be called for.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →