Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

New Single‑Cell Platform Tracks RNA and Protein in Immune Signaling

A new single‑cell sequencing method is giving researchers a clearer view of how immune cells actually behave—capturing not just what they plan to do, but what they are doing in real time. The platform, called CIPHER‑seq, measures RNA and proteins simultaneousl

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

A new single‑cell sequencing method is giving researchers a clearer view of how immune cells actually behave—capturing not just what they plan to do, but what they are doing in real time. The platform, called CIPHER‑seq, measures RNA and proteins simultaneously inside the same immune cell, exposing gaps between genetic intent and functional output that have long complicated studies of cytokine signaling. The work, titled “CIPHER-seq enables intracellular multimodal profiling of cytokine responses in single immune cells,” appears in Scientific Reports.

Single‑cell RNA sequencing has reshaped immunology by revealing which genes are switched on across thousands of cells at once. But RNA alone can be misleading, especially for cytokines. However, RNA is only a set of instructions; proteins carry out the action. And for cytokines, RNA levels often fail to predict how much protein a cell actually produces. “In immune cells, RNA and protein don’t always rise and fall together,” said co‑senior author Emiliano Cocco, PhD, an assistant professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at the Miller School.

CIPHER‑seq (Cytokine Intracellular Protein High-throughput Expression with RNA-sequencing) was designed to close that gap. Developed by researchers at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, together with collaborators at UCSF and the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, the method gently preserves cells and captures multiple molecular layers at once. From a single immune cell, CIPHER‑seq can quantify genome‑wide RNA, surface proteins, intracellular proteins, and cytokines that have not yet been released—creating a more complete snapshot of immune activity than RNA‑only approaches.

“RNA gives us clues about where a cell is headed,” said co‑senior author Justin Taylor, MD, a Sylvester physician-scientist. “Proteins show us where it actually arrives, and this clearer picture could help scientists design better immunotherapies and help clinicians predict which patients are most likely to benefit from them.”

The team validated the platform by stimulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and tracking their responses. According to the study, CIPHER‑seq captured robust induction of key cytokines—including interferon‑gamma and tumor necrosis factor—while also resolving metabolic remodeling during activation. Importantly, the method revealed the timing of these events: RNA signals rose first, followed by delayed but consistent protein accumulation. First author Avni Bhalgat, PhD, described it as “seeing the plan before the action. Cytokines help determine whether immune cells attack cancer, ignore it, or even help tumors grow.”

The researchers also compared CIPHER‑seq with standard single‑cell workflows and found a notable difference: cells processed with CIPHER‑seq showed far fewer mitochondrial stress signatures. Some existing protocols inadvertently damage cells during preparation, triggering artificial stress responses. By reducing these artifacts, CIPHER‑seq provides a cleaner readout of immune behavior.

The authors emphasize that this multimodal view is especially valuable for studying cancer, inflammation, and treatment resistance—contexts where cytokine timing and protein abundance can shape therapeutic outcomes. “The platform helps us move beyond inference and toward understanding how immune responses truly unfold—one cell at a time,” Taylor added. By tracking RNA and protein together, CIPHER‑seq moves researchers beyond inference and toward a step‑by‑step understanding of how immune responses unfold.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →