Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Neok Bio launches with $75M to make dual-targeting ADCs

Dive Brief: Neok Bio emerged from stealth on Tuesday with $75 million in Series A funding and plans to develop what it claims are “differentiated” antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs, that can overcome the limitations of their predecessors. The company aims to d

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Dive Brief:

  • Neok Bio emerged from stealth on Tuesday with $75 million in Series A funding and plans to develop what it claims are “differentiated” antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs, that can overcome the limitations of their predecessors.
  • The company aims to develop a pipeline of “bispecific” ADCs that can simultaneously home in on what it says are “unique pairs” of cancer targets. One, codenamed Neok001, aims at B7-H3 and ROR1, two well-studied proteins involved in tumor growth. Another, Neok002, locks onto cells expressing EGFR and MUC1, two other known targets. Neok said both have shown the potential to demonstrate “enhanced efficacy and safety” over typical ADCs in a variety of tumor types.
  • Neok’s principal investor is ABL Bio, a Korean antibody engineering specialist. The financing will help advance Neok’s two lead programs into human testing next year. Results from those studies are expected in 2027.

Dive Insight:

Antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs, are essentially precision chemotherapy. By chemically linking a toxic payload to a targeting molecule, ADCs are meant to destroy cancer cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. That promise has led to multiple approved medicines in recent years and, along the way, made ADCs a hot spot for research and investment. But the technology remains imperfect, giving startups with new twists on the approach the chance to stand out.

Neok CEO Mayank Gandhi Permission granted by Neok

Mayank Gandhi, Neok’s CEO, noted how first-generation ADCs still have a limited “therapeutic window,” or range of doses that should be safe as well as effective enough. The “majority,” once injected, don’t even reach a tumor, an issue that blunts their effectiveness and causes side effects, he added. Neok claims that its ADCs, which target two cancer proteins instead of one and involve a special kind of linker technology, can overcome those issues. These dual-targeting ADCs should be able to address a wider array of solid tumors and do so more precisely, according to Gandhi. “We feel like we'll be able to overcome these limitations and have more stable, homogeneous ADCs,” he said. Many others are advancing bispecific ADCs too , among them large pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and AstraZeneca. Neok is counting on the particular pairings of targets it’s selected, as well as the know-how of its principal backer, ABL Bio, to help it stand out. ABL Bio has brought multiple bispecific antibodies for cancer and neurological diseases into human testing, and has partnerships with firms such as GSK and Sanofi. “There's a great track record, and this is where their expertise to fine-tune and create these bispecific antibody constructs is very helpful,” Gandhi said. The company’s ADCs also use a linker technology that’s become popular among biotech companies. That technology was developed by Synaffix, which was acquired by Lonza in 2023 , and has been licensed to several biotechs , including Neok. “It's getting established as one of the top-tier linker payload platforms from a manufacturing standpoint,” Gandhi said. Neok didn’t specify which tumors it’ll go after first, but Gandhi indicated the company “should be able to effectively target many indications with like large unmet needs,” such as thoracic, gastrointestinal and gynecological tumors. “We are very excited to build and use this capital to grow in the U.S. and establish the company and show the differentiated nature of the programs,” Gandhi said.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
02What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
03What the Artificial Neuron Cannot Do

Hersam’s next goal is a small circuit — perhaps 10 artificial neurons — where each one fires differently, and together they accomplish what would require thousands of conventional transistors. “ Silicon achieves complexity by having billions of identical devices,” Hersam said. “The brain is the opposite. It’s heterogeneous. The complexity is at the device level.” But Gaudet sees a gap no circuit design can yet fill: Biological neurons grow new connections and prune old ones, strengthening pathways that are used and weakening those that aren’t. Hersam’s lab’s printed neurons — or any other neuromorphic technology that mimics neuronal dynamics — can’t achieve that level of complexity yet. Brown is careful about the distance remaining between these printed neurons and the real thing. “Neurons are just so flexible,” he said. “They can totally change what they’re doing based on whether they’ve learned something and based on your emotional state. There’s a lot of hidden mysteries.” Sangwan suspects the device has more to reveal. “It’s a nonlinear dynamical system,” he said. “We don’t fully know how many different variables you need to explain it. It’s just the beginning.” Hersam, Sangwan, Brown, Holla, and Gaudet reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Disclosure information for study authors is available in the original study publication.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →