Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Motor Protein Dynamics Guide Brain Disease Drug Targeting

The cell cytoskeleton is modulated by motor proteins, known as dyneins, that generate force and movement on microtubules to control a wealth of biological processes, including motility, cell division, and intracellular transport. Mutation of Lis1, a key dynein

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

The cell cytoskeleton is modulated by motor proteins, known as dyneins, that generate force and movement on microtubules to control a wealth of biological processes, including motility, cell division, and intracellular transport.

Mutation of Lis1, a key dynein regulator, can lead to the rare mental developmental disorder lissencephaly, or “smooth brain,” where the brain’s surface lacks the normal folds and grooves, for which there is no cure.

In a new paper published in Nature Structural and Molecular Biology titled, “Multiple steps of dynein activation by Lis1 visualized by cryo-EM,” researchers from the Salk Institute and University of California, San Diego (UCSD), have catalogued new high resolution Lis1 and dynein protein dynamics to guide the design of neurological drugs. Using a yeast model, the team solved 16 new structural conformations of dynein-Lis1 by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to inform precise atomic locations for drug targeting.

“Our approach to imaging dynein and Lis1 is more comprehensive than any previous study on this protein,” said co-corresponding author Andres Leschziner, PhD, professor at UCSD. “By capturing movies rather than pictures, we confirmed 16 detailed, 3D shapes that dynein takes as it interacts with Lis1, several of which are entirely unique to our study.”

Dynein belongs to the ATPase associated with various cellular activities (AAA+) family of proteins and uses the energy from ATP hydrolysis to generate force and movement. Dynein exists predominantly detached from the microtubule in the autoinhibited “Phi” or “locked” conformation in cells. Recent studies suggest that Lis1 has crucial roles in dynein activation (“unlocked” state) and complex assembly. Based on evidence that dynein mutants locked in a microtubule-unbound state bind to Lis1 with a stronger affinity than their microtubule-bound counterpart, Lis1 is suggested to regulate dynein before dynein interacts with microtubules. However, the precise structural mechanism of dynein activation remains unclear.

While previous studies have used cryo-EM and other imaging methods to construct images of dynein in its locked and unlocked states individually, the Salk and UCSD authors present a time-resolved capture that identifies a series of structures over time to create a movie of dynein movement. The movie documents the step-by-step transition toward dynein activation by identifying the sub-second changes in structure.

The dynein complex is composed of a dimer of two motor domains and two copies each of five accessory chains (an intermediate chain, a light intermediate chain, and three light chains). Its heavy chain includes a motor domain composed of six AAA+ modules. Each AAA module is composed of a large and small domain, with nucleotide binding taking place in a groove between them and the large domain of the adjacent AAA module.

The authors suggest that Lis1 relieves dynein autoinhibition by increasing its basal ATP hydrolysis rate to promote conformations compatible with complex assembly and motility. The data support a hypothesis in which Lis1 promotes dynein activation by facilitating a nucleotide exchange in AAA3, potentially priming dynein for complex assembly.

“The impressive tools we have today in the lab made it possible for us to create a movie of dynein and Lis1 interacting in real time. Having this detailed view of their stepwise partnership will help us find ways to restore their activity in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases,” said Agnieszka Kendrick, PhD, assistant professor at Salk and co-corresponding author of the study.

The new high-resolution, 3D structural insight into dynein and Lis1 could pave the way for treating their dysfunction in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. Future studies will explore how different mutations to Lis1 affect its interactions with dynein and contribute to lissencephaly and other rare genetic disorders.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →