Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Molecular Pathway Transmits Itches, but Not Ouches

Along the signaling pathways connecting the skin and the brain, there are gatekeepers, neurotransmitters that relay signals, or not, depending on whether the signals are of the sort the brain interprets as itching sensations, or pain sensations. These gatekeep

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Along the signaling pathways connecting the skin and the brain, there are gatekeepers, neurotransmitters that relay signals, or not, depending on whether the signals are of the sort the brain interprets as itching sensations, or pain sensations. These gatekeepers, found recently by scientists based at North Carolina University, raise the possibility that drugs could be developed targeting itching, but not pain, or vice versa.

A particular kind of neurotransmitter, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), has been studied by North Carolina State University researchers. BNP is expressed in a small number of sensory nerve cells or neurons. The researchers knew that BNP helps transmit itching sensations from the skin to the brain. But was it also involved in transmitting pain sensations?

To explore this question, the researchers looked at whether BNP played a role in transmitting acute, inflammatory, or neuropathic pain in mice. They found that BNP plays no role in pain transmission.

The results were the same for regular mice and those that lacked the BNP gene. “That means BNP was not involved for any of these distinct types of pain,” said Santosh Mishra, Ph.D., assistant professor of neuroscience in NC State's College of Veterinary Medicine. “We know that if we target BNP, we won't be inhibiting pain; we'll be inhibiting itch.”

Details of the researchers’ work appeared October 2 in the journal Molecular Pain, in an article entitled “Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Expressing Sensory Neurons Are Not Involved in Acute, Inflammatory or Neuropathic Pain.” The article describes how researchers led by Mishra compared behavioral responses of BNP-knockout (KO) mice with their wild-type littermates.

“First, we showed that BNP is not required in chemically-induced pain responses evoked by the administration of capsaicin, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP), or inflammatory soup,” wrote the article’s authors. “We further measured pain behaviors and found no involvement of BNP in hot, cold, or mechanical nociceptive responses in mice, nor did we find evidence for the involvement of BNP in neuroinflammatory sensitization elicited by complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) or in neuropathic pain.”

The authors asserted that their findings are consistent with the hypothesis that BNP does not play a functional role in mediating pain. The authors also suggested that more study needs to be done to elucidate the spinal complexity for pain and itch sensation.

“For us, it's very important to understand the neural circuits or pathways so that we can develop therapies specifically for pain or itch, instead of targeting it as a whole system,” added Mishra, the article’s corresponding author. “This work shines a light on these different pathways for pain and itch.”

Pain or itching sensations begin when a nerve cell on the surface of the body reacts to a stimulus, starting a chain reaction that moves from cell to cell.

“Neurons react to a stimulus by depolarizing, which is how the cells talk to each other,” Mishra explained. “Once it's depolarized, a neuron releases a neurotransmitter, which starts the communication from one cell to another, moving from the periphery of the body to the central nervous system.”

The neural pathway takes the message to the spinal cord, which is connected to the brain. The brain interprets the signals from the nerves, creating the sensations of pain and itching.

“If we know how these sensations are transmitted, we can design specific drugs or therapies to block the neurotransmitters, block the receptors for the neurotransmitters, or reduce the degree to which those neurotransmitters work,” Mishra speculated. “I call these the gatekeepers because they are sitting in between the skin and the central nervous system.”

The goal is to develop treatments that interrupt the pain or itch signals closer to the source.

“If we can block the sensation at the peripheral level, in the skin, that is a much friendlier way than to try to target the sensation once it reaches the brain,” Mishra insisted. “We know the importance of pain management. Studying itching sensations is a relatively new field, but if we look at the number of diseases where itch is a major symptom, it includes not only atopic dermatitis but also nervous system disorders such as multiple sclerosis, as well as infection and end-stage kidney disease. This work is an initial step in gaining a better understanding.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →