Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Missing Molecule May Explain Down Syndrome

Faulty brain circuits seen in Down syndrome may be caused by the lack of a particular molecule essential for the development and function of the nervous system, according to a new study in lab mice. Restoring the molecule, called pleiotrophin, could improve br

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Faulty brain circuits seen in Down syndrome may be caused by the lack of a particular molecule essential for the development and function of the nervous system, according to a new study in lab mice. Restoring the molecule, called pleiotrophin, could improve brain function in Down syndrome and other neurological diseases, possibly even in adults, the researchers say.

The scientists conducted their work in mice, rather than in people, so the approach is far from being available as a treatment. But the researchers found that administering pleiotrophin improved brain function in adult mice long after the brain was fully formed. That suggests that the approach could offer major advantages over prior attempts to enhance Down syndrome brain circuits that would have required intervention at extremely precise, and brief, times during pregnancy.

“This study is exciting because it serves as proof-of-concept that we can target astrocytes, a cell type in the brain specialized for secreting synapse-modulating molecules, to rewire the brain circuity at adult ages,” said researcher Ashley N. Brandebura, PhD, who was part of the research team while at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies and is now part of the University of Virginia School of Medicine. “This is still far off from use in humans, but it gives us hope that secreted molecules can be delivered with effective gene therapies or potentially protein infusions to improve quality of life in Down syndrome.”

Understanding Down syndrome

Down syndrome affects approximately one in 640 babies born each year in the U.S., according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Caused by a mistake in cell division during development, the condition can lead to developmental delays, hyperactivity, shortened lifespan, and increased risk for medical problems such as heart defects, thyroid issues, and problems with hearing and vision.

Salk researchers, led by Nicola J. Allen, PhD, wanted to better understand the causes of Down syndrome, so they looked for cellular proteins altered in the brains of lab mice used to model the condition. The scientists identified pleiotrophin as a promising candidate because it is present at high levels at critical moments in brain development and because it plays essential roles in the formation of brain synapses and in the development of axons and dendrites. Further, the presence of the protein is reduced in Down syndrome. To determine if restoring pleiotrophin would improve brain function, the researchers delivered it where it was needed using viral vectors.

The researchers found that administering pleiotrophin to astrocytes had big benefits, including increasing the number of synapses in the hippocampus region of the brain. Further, it increased brain plasticity (the ability to form or modify connections essential for learning and memory).

“These results suggest we can use astrocytes as vectors to deliver plasticity-inducing molecules to the brain,” Allen said. “This could one day allow us to rewire faulty connections and improve brain performance.”

While the findings are promising, the scientists don’t believe that pleiotrophin is the only cause of brain circuit problems in Down syndrome. Further research is needed to understand the complex contributors to the condition, they caution. But their work, they say, provides proof of the viability of an approach that could be beneficial not just for Down syndrome, but other neurological diseases as well.

“This idea that astrocytes can deliver molecules to induce brain plasticity has implications for many neurological disorders, including other neurodevelopmental disorders like fragile X syndrome but also maybe even to neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease,” Brandebura said. “If we can figure out how to ‘reprogram’ disordered astrocytes to deliver synaptogenic molecules, we can have some greatly beneficial impact on many different disease states.”

Having completed her postdoctoral studies at Salk, Brandebura plans to continue her research in her new post at UVA Health, where she is a member of the UVA Brain Institute, the department of neuroscience and the Center for Brain Immunology and Science and the Center for Brain Immunology and Glia.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →