Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

MapLight dives despite positive data for schizophrenia drug

Brain drug developer MapLight Therapeutics lost two-thirds of its market value Monday after unveiling clinical trial results that, while positive, raised doubts about whether one of its experimental medicines can compete against a rival product from Bristol My

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

Brain drug developer MapLight Therapeutics lost two-thirds of its market value Monday after unveiling clinical trial results that, while positive, raised doubts about whether one of its experimental medicines can compete against a rival product from Bristol Myers Squibb. The mid-stage trial found MapLight’s medicine generally safe and effective in adults with schizophrenia who were experiencing a sudden worsening of psychotic symptoms. On the study’s main measure, which used a well-known scoring system for schizophrenia symptoms, participants given twice-daily doses of the medicine experienced an average 4.5-point improvement compared to those on a placebo. The effect was even more pronounced, MapLight said, in the subset of participants who stayed on the medicine for the entirety of the core five-week treatment period. Patients on the twice-daily regimen also fared significantly better on a series of “secondary” tests and “exploratory outcomes.” The trial evaluated a once-daily option as well, but the drug didn’t hit the study’s primary endpoint. MapLight is still analyzing the results to see if there’s a path forward for that regimen. In a statement, MapLight CEO Chris Kroeger said the company is “very encouraged by these results,” which represent a “powerful, comprehensive overall efficacy profile in schizophrenia.” Kroeger also said researchers saw a “robust signal” on one of those secondary tests that supports MapLight’s drug having cognitive benefits in addition to antipsychotic activity. Such a finding “strengthens the rationale” for a separate, ongoing trial that’s testing the drug against Alzheimer's disease psychosis. MapLight’s drug comes as a fixed-dose tablet, with one of the active ingredients being a chemical that amplifies two types of “muscarinic receptors.” These proteins regulate neurotransmitters like dopamine, glutamate and acetylcholine and can therefore stabilize brain cell signaling, making them attractive targets for psychiatric diseases. Bristol Myers’ Cobenfy acts on the same receptors as MapLight’s medicine and won Food and Drug Administration approval almost two years ago. Across two pivotal studies using that well-known “PANSS” scoring system, the Cobenfy-treated groups experienced 8.4-point and 9.6-point improvements over their placebo arm counterparts. Cross-trial comparisons are often tricky. Even so, MapLight investors “may push back on the magnitude of PANSS reduction here [versus Cobenfy’s] pivotal studies,” according to Stifel analyst Paul Matteis. They appeared to do just that, as MapLight shares were down 66% by late Monday morning, to trade at $12.14 apiece. “We get it,” Matteis wrote in a note to clients, but while Cobenfy's efficacy was “awesome” in testing, “this profile seemingly isn't being achieved in the real world” because of tolerability and dosing issues. Cobenfy capsules are supposed to be taken twice daily on an empty stomach and following a specific titration schedule. MapLight’s drug, meanwhile, has no fasting requirement. So-called treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild, and “all-cause” discontinuation across the active arms in MapLight’s study was 19.9%. Matties noted how discontinuation rates were roughly 28% across the key Cobenfy studies, and that, aside from nausea and abdominal pain, MapLight’s results show lower rates for all the other most important adverse events. MapLight “thus has a case for an important drug in schizophrenia, but also potentially [Alzheimer’s disease psychosis] where the differentiation case strengthens,” he wrote. "Despite recent advances in schizophrenia treatment, patients and clinicians continue to need therapies that pair meaningful symptom control with a tolerability profile patients can sustain over time," said John Kane, a professor of psychiatry and molecular medicine at Hofstra University and member of MapLight’s clinical advisory board, in the company’s statement.

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01What Comes Next

With data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are prioritizing histology alongside patient-reported outcomes using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary, one of only two instruments developed in line with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, to capture changes in symptoms such as abdominal pain and nausea. Ultimately, the broader aim is to give gastroenterologists and patients a therapeutic option for a disease that has long been managed without one. The future of drug development will not be defined by statistical significance alone, but by whether new therapies also improve the daily burden of living with celiac disease. “The first therapy to cross the line could change the field,” Geller concluded. “It would help establish celiac as a serious medical condition with options beyond a restrictive diet and open the door for what comes next.” Dr. Paul Lizzul is chief medical officer at First Tracks Biotherapeutics, a clinical ‑ stage biotechnology company advancing antibody therapeutics that modulate immune pathways implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Marilyn Geller serves as an advisor to First Tracks Bio. Footnotes Abadie V, Jabri B. IL-15: a central regulator of celiac disease immunopathology. Immunol Rev . 2014;260(1):221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12191. Yokoyama S, Watanabe N, Sato N, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-15 reverses the autoimmune intestinal damage in transgenic mice that overexpress IL-15 in enterocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2009;106(37):15849-15854. https://doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0908834106. Anthony S, Schluns KS. Emerging roles for IL-15 in the activation and function of T-cells during immune stimulation. Research and Reports in Biology . 2015;6:25-37. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRB.S57685.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
02How Real Brain Cells Respond to Artificial Neurons

Holla, who completed her PhD in Raman’s lab and is now a postdoctoral researcher studying memory at New York University in New York City, designed and ran experiments in mouse cerebellar slices. She positioned a stimulation electrode on the parallel fibers, the main pathway that excites Purkinje cells, and a recording electrode on the Purkinje cells themselves. She played recordings of the artificial neurons’ waveforms into the tissue through a standard stimulation electrode at four different speeds: 7, 60, 218, and 740 spikes per second. At every speed below 200 spikes per second, the Purkinje cells fired in response. The strongest results came at 60 spikes per second, where each artificial spike lasted 0.7 milliseconds, which is fast enough to trigger the cell but brief enough to avoid flooding the tissue with unnecessary current. Above 200 spikes per second, the cells stopped responding. They simply cannot fire that fast. The team included the 740-spikes-per-second condition on purpose to directly challenge the many engineering groups building artificial neurons that operate at those speeds. “We had to show them [740 spikes] wasn’t sufficient,” Brown said. “You can’t work that fast.” “You can see the living neurons respond to our artificial neuron,” Hersam said. But he is careful to note a caveat: The printed artificial neurons were not touching the brain tissue. The waveforms they generated were recorded and then played back into the slice through standard laboratory stimulation equipment. The next step is to prove the printed device itself can interface with living tissue.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
03Lifestyle Matters: How do environmental and lifestyle factors influence Alzheimer’s disease?

Dr. Harrison and Finnish neuroscientist Dr. Miia Kivipelto explore the complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle in Alzheimer's development. Learn how the groundbreaking FINGER study demonstrates potential prevention strategies, and discover the latest evidence on how environmental factors, diet, and chronic conditions influence Alzheimer's risk.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
04China: Threat or opportunity?

One of the biggest biotech news stories of recent years is China’s continued rise as a biotech and life sciences powerhouse. China conducts a quarter of all clinical trials and drug development and has almost 1,500 new drugs in development.¹ Many China-based biotechs have benefitted from government funds, out-licencing deals with large pharmas and venture capital funding. However, policymakers in the US and EU have concerns about the possible threat to their region’s biosecurity and competitiveness as centres for health and life science research. Given China’s increased importance, ICON Biotech conducted the same biotech sector survey with 100 China-based biotech leaders. The results show that Chinese biotechs face many of the same challenges as biotechs located elsewhere. They share the same funding challenges and burdens associated with increasingly complex clinical trials and regulations.

Source: www.biopharmadive.com ↗
05Why Muscle Cells Might Do Some Heavy Lifting

Brown was studying gene therapy in the 1990s when he designed a technology to turn mRNA expression on or off in different cells. For the new mouse study, published in Nature Biotechnology , he adapted the technology to turn off mRNA expression in dendritic cells, muscle cells, or liver cells. The researchers then vaccinated the mice with each version, delivering the vaccines both intravenously and intramuscularly. “The results were pretty stunning,” Brown said. When mRNA expression was turned off in muscle cells, T-cell response went down, suggesting muscle cells play a role in immunity. When expression was turned off in liver cells, T-cell expression tripled — indicating liver cells dampen immunity. Turning off expression in dendritic cells had no effect on T-cell activation, though it did reduce the number of killer T cells by as much as half. (Interestingly, no such reduction occurred when the antigen was SARS-CoV-2 spike. Brown is now investigating why different antigens had varying effects.) Knowing all this is crucial for designing effective mRNA vaccines and therapies. That’s because different mRNA therapies require different strategies. Cancer vaccines must boost tumor-fighting killer (CD8+) T cells. For genetic disease treatments, scientists want to avoid triggering the immune system to prevent killing the very cells the mRNA is meant to modify. “Understanding the immunology is extremely important for this class of drug,” Brown said. The finding doesn’t mean dendritic cells aren’t important for mRNA vaccines to work. “It just means that the mRNA doesn’t have to get into those cells to induce an immune response,” Brown said. Instead, the antigen can be transferred to those dendritic cells.

Source: www.medscape.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →