Independent education resourceInformation here does not replace care from a qualified health professional.
Peptide Therapy GuideClear peptide education

Educational guide

Many More Misfolded Proteins May Contribute to Alzheimer’s and Dementia than Previously Identified

For decades, the story of Alzheimer’s research has been dominated by a battle between amyloid-beta and tau amyloids, both of which can kill neurons and impact the brain’s ability to function. A new study by Johns Hopkins University researchers now suggests tha

Written by Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team
For education only

This guide cannot diagnose a condition or recommend a personal treatment plan. Discuss medical questions with a qualified professional.

For decades, the story of Alzheimer’s research has been dominated by a battle between amyloid-beta and tau amyloids, both of which can kill neurons and impact the brain’s ability to function. A new study by Johns Hopkins University researchers now suggests that these sticky brain plaques may not be operating alone.

The investigators used a structural proteomic technology known as limited proteolysis mass spectrometry (LiP-MS), which can distinguish subtle structural changes across many proteins in a complex mixture, to identify in rats more than 200 types of misfolded proteins that could be associated with age-related cognitive decline.

The team suggested that identification of proteins that have undergone cognition-associated structural changes (CASCs) could point toward identifying new therapeutic targets and treatments for human patients over 65 with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, or other disorders that impact independence as they age.

“Amyloids are the buildup of misshapen proteins,” said research lead Stephen Fried, PhD, an assistant professor of chemistry and protein scientist who studies how molecules in the brain change during aging. “They’re big and ugly and easy to see under the microscope, so it makes sense that they catch our attention. But we’re seeing hundreds of proteins misfolding in ways that don’t clump together in an amyloid and yet still seem to impact how the brain functions. Our research is showing that amyloids are just the tip of the iceberg.”

Fried and colleagues reported on their findings in Science Advances, in a paper titled “Proteins with cognition-associated structural changes in a rat model of aging exhibit reduced refolding capacity.”

Cognitive decline during aging represents what the authors describe as “a major societal burden” that causes both personal and economic hardship in an increasingly aging population. To understand the molecular differences between older brains that are mentally sharp and those that are experiencing decline, Fried and his team studied 17 two-year-old rats that grew up in the same colony. Seven rats performed poorly on memory and problem-solving tests and were considered cognitively impaired, while 10 performed as well as six-month-old rats.

Using this technique the scientists were, for the first time, able to determine for a large number of proteins whether individual proteins were misshapen or folded incorrectly, allowing them to work out which proteins misfold for all the rats and are associated with aging in general, versus which proteins specifically misfold in cognitively impaired rats. “Many studies have found that the proteostasis network, which functions to keep proteins properly folded, is impaired with age, suggesting that there may be many proteins that incur structural alterations with age,” they noted.

The team’s study showed that more than 200 proteins were misfolded in the cognitively impaired rats, yet maintained their shapes in the cognitively healthy rats. The findings suggest that some of those proteins are contributing to cognitive decline, the researchers said. “A number of these proteins have been implicated in memory, aging, and synaptic health, whereas many others represent previously unexplored targets for further study or therapeutics,” they further pointed out. “Perhaps most notably, we find that CASC proteins are generally nonrefoldable; that is, they often are unable to spontaneously return to their native conformations following global denaturation.”

Misfolded proteins are unable to carry out tasks necessary for a cell to function properly, so cells have a natural surveillance system that identifies and destroys these misbehaving proteins. Previously, researchers thought misfolded proteins—specifically A-beta and tau proteins—were only disruptive when they clumped into amyloids.

“Research in aging, dementia, and neurodegenerative disease has long made a connection between these disease processes and protein misfolding; however, emphasis has historically been paid to proteins that form amyloids or other insoluble aggregates,” the scientists stated. The newly reported study, they commented, “suggests that there may be previously unidentified avenues for potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers for cognitive decline than the small subset of amyloid-forming proteins frequently studied.”

Fried added, “We think there are a lot of proteins that can be misfolded, not form amyloids, and still be problematic. And that suggests these misfolded proteins have ways of escaping this surveillance system in the cell.”

But exactly how those misfolded proteins slip past a cell’s security system remains a mystery. Next, the team plans to look at misfolded proteins under high-resolution microscopes to get a more detailed picture of what their deformities look like at the molecular level. “A lot of us have experienced a loved one or a relative who has become less capable of doing those everyday tasks that require cognitive abilities,” Fried said. “Understanding what’s physically going on in the brain could lead to better treatments and preventive measures.”

In their paper the team concluded, “To summarize, we have found that structural proteomics is an emerging ‘omics’ method that is particularly relevant for dissecting the features associated with progressive age-related cognition loss … Further mechanistic and structural studies on specific CASC proteins could promote some of the proteins disclosed here to be considered therapeutic targets or early disease biomarkers.”

Connected reading

Helpful context for this guide

Source-derived material selected through this article’s indexed topics.

Related questions

01Undruggable or unscreenable?

Another obstacle to discovering new PPI inhibitors is the lack of libraries designed to hunt for them, points out Philippe Roche, PhD, senior scientist at the Integrative Structural and Chemical Biology team at the Cancer Research Center of Marseilles, France. “If you screen PPIs using libraries that were designed for kinases or GPCRs, that’s why you don’t get a lot of good results,” he says. To that end, his group began assembling a library focused on orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs. The result was 2P2Idb, a hand-curated, structural database cataloguing orthosteric inhibitors of PPIs for which the interface had been 3D characterized. From analyzing these known PPI inhibitors, and what structures they had in common, Roche and his colleagues developed a model to predict whether compounds would likely inhibit PPIs. Using this method, 2P2Idb creates an enriched screening library that dramatically increases the hit rate compared to standard libraries. Having proven their success with a small library of 1600 compounds, they are in the process of expanding the library to 10,000 compounds. Once that’s published, “the idea is to make this library available to labs around the world,” Roche says. “We will provide the library free of charge for people to be able to screen PPI targets.”

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
02How stable is the antibody?

A crucial question often addressed during preclinical development focuses on the in vivo stability of therapeutic antibodies. Increasing the half-life of a therapeutic antibody has several benefits ranging from higher treatment efficacy to increased advantages for the patients who will have a fewer number of therapy sessions and a reduced cost. Given these compelling benefits, following the identification of therapeutic antibodies with the desired specificity, developers usually subject them to a refinement step to increase their stability. This process is often hindered by the lack of reliable experimental tools to predict the half-life of antibodies in patients. The major hurdle of using mouse models to predict antibody stability in the serum lies in the way immunoglobulin proteins are processed by the organism. In mammals, most proteins circulating in the serum undergo constant uptake by endothelial cells and are routed through the endosomes to the lysosomal compartment for degradation. In the endosomes, immunoglobulin G (IgG) proteins are recognized and bound by a transmembrane protein, called the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which mediates their recycling to the plasma membrane and subsequent release back into the serum. As a result, the half-life of IgGs are significantly extended by this mechanism. Since most therapeutic antibodies belong to the IgG class, this recycling system is very relevant for their relative stability in the body. Remarkably, the relative affinity between IgGs and FcRn is extremely disparate between different species, with the mouse receptor showing a much higher affinity than its human counterpart.

Source: www.genengnews.com ↗
P

About the author

Peptide Therapy Guide Editorial Team

Editorial team for Peptide Therapy Guide.

View all articles →